Resource Notice - 2026-06-13

The Galena group received a short resource notice saying the retry window would be narrow but usable. The note says the team could borrow a modest allocation if the rerun needed extra room. A side remark compares Galena with Zircon, but Zircon is only background context label in the note. The notice also warns that the first attempt should not be treated as final if the rerun produces a cleaner trace. The capacity update was written so the next check could proceed without waiting for a larger reservation.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-14

Bellwether Grove announced that the review window would be handled with a smaller support pool than the earlier draft suggested. The notice says Nia Hart would keep the coordination list current while the team waited on the revised plan. An earlier idea for a broader support burst was recorded as tentative, not final. The note also mentions Project Asterion Grove only as a neighboring effort with a separate schedule. By the end of the notice, the leaner setup was described as the working assumption for Bellwether Grove.


Review Memo - 2026-06-05

This memo records the final review position for Project Halcyon Archive. The revised ranking pass was accepted as the reference path for the archive review. The memo says the older scoring path was kept only as a comparison case because it did not hold up well under inspection. Nina Vale signed off after the team confirmed the newer path matched the discussion notes. A brief appendix warns not to borrow the standard from a different project that had a similar review title.


Email Thread - 2026-06-12

The email thread says the reviewers accepted the stricter retrieval pass and closed the Citadel follow-up. Tomas Lee replied that the rerun was the version to keep, since the clipped run had already been ruled out. The thread confirms that the archived sparse path would stay untouched in case anyone wanted to compare it later. One message asks whether the final writeup should mention the exact failure mode, but the thread leaves that point open. The last reply thanks the team and says the official status was now settled.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-05-02

These minutes cover the first planning pass for Daffodil Delta and the retrieval setup under review. The team first leaned toward a cross-encoder reranker for the evidence pass, but that option was treated as provisional. By the end of the discussion, the group said the rerun would use late interaction instead. Mina Rao was kept on the follow-up list for the Daffodil Delta notes. A separate pilot from another project was mentioned only as a cautionary comparison and was not adopted here.


Incident Report - 2026-06-15

This incident report describes the failed Nightjar Beacon trial and the immediate response. The run stopped with an out-of-memory fault before the evaluation pass could finish. Operators noted that the heavier configuration had been chosen too early, before the backup plan could be activated. The same report says the team set aside that option and prepared a leaner rerun instead. A brief comparison mentioned another project that was still deciding on memo wording, but that was not relevant to the failure. The incident ended with a request to document the corrected setup for review.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-24

This weekly report gives the final status for Onyx Horizon. The Maple route is now the accepted reference, and the Juniper failure is archived as invalid. The report says the project can move on without repeating the discarded attempt. Onyx Harbor appears again as the local shorthand used by the team. The summary ends with a note that the next review will build on the Maple result.


Email Thread - 2026-05-20

This email thread opens the Citadel draft plan for the next review cycle. The first message proposed a document-chunking workflow, but the sender said it was only a starting point. A reply from the same thread suggested switching to metric smoothing after the initial pass looked noisy. The note also warned not to confuse this work with a separate Saffron discussion that mentioned a similar rerank idea. The thread ended with a request to keep the later smoothing option available for the meeting.


Email Thread - 2026-06-08

The planning thread for Kelpie Delta opened with a cautious note about keeping the review scope small. One reply said the first draft would stay in place only if the follow-up check stayed clean. Another message mentioned that the team was watching a separate calibration lane, but that lane was not the main story. A later reply proposed shifting the review to a narrower evidence set if the broader pass kept wobbling. The thread ended with a reminder to compare the draft against the later handoff rather than the old notes.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-19

The Citadel meeting opened with a reminder that the project had to choose a cleaner analysis path before the next status check. The group dropped the earlier chain-style check because it had produced noisy comparisons. By the end of the meeting, the team agreed to use a structured prompting flow for the revised review. A side remark mentions Project Aurora only as a different effort that was not part of the same decision. The chair asked for a fresh memo after the rerun so the final recommendation would be easier to verify.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-04

The weekly report says the Asterion Archive rerun completed without the earlier instability. The dense route became the review standard because it held together across the full archive sample. Mina Cho noted that the fallback alias-expansion path was kept only as a comparison point and was not used for the final sign-off. A brief side note mentions that a neighboring job had failed again, but that did not affect the archive result. The report closes with the final status: the archive pass was accepted and no further retry was requested.


Change Request - 2026-06-29

The change request formalizes the corrected review for Citadel Matrix after the draft was rejected. Citadel Spire is repeated as the local alias, and North Gate is called a comparison path only. The writer explains that the earlier mismatch made the first version unsuitable for approval. The revised version is said to keep the same evidence trail while dropping the flawed draft. A note says the final memo should point to the corrected review and not the abandoned path.


Email Thread - 2026-05-19

In the follow-up thread, the team confirmed that the side queue was no longer part of the Falcon plan. The first allocation suggestion had asked for extra compute, but it was withdrawn after the review lead said the smaller setup was enough. Talia Reed replied that the roster should stay with the revised setup until the next checkpoint. A brief aside about Project Echelon arriving late caused confusion, though it did not affect the Falcon decision. The sender closed by saying the updated plan was the only one that should be treated as active. No new fallback was introduced in the thread.


Review Memo - 2026-06-27

This memo reviews the Parallax Beacon rerun and the evidence trail behind the final recommendation. The memo says the earlier attempt was rejected because the validation trace wobbled under load. It then points to the rerun as the cleaner result, especially after Mina Vale flagged the steadier calibration notes. The reviewer also mentions a discarded branch that tried to tighten the filter too aggressively. That branch was useful as a contrast, but the memo says it was not the basis for the final call. The closing note asks the team to keep the rerun record handy for the next comparison.


Incident Report - 2026-06-20

Project Galena Meadow's rerun completed after the earlier pilot was discarded. The first attempt failed because the evidence index was incomplete, so the team treated that result as invalid. The rerun used the revised retrieval path and finished cleanly on the second try. After the rerun, the reviewer noted that the cleaner path was the one to trust for the final comparison. A neighboring project also had a noisy run that day, but its issue came from a different logging bug. The report closed by saying the team should keep the rerun notes as the reference point for later review.


Resource Notice - 2026-07-05

The notice announced that Bellwether would have a short compute window for the next evaluation cycle. Only one shared accelerator block was set aside for the project, so the team had to choose carefully between the two candidate runs. The message warned that a second run would need to wait unless the first attempt failed quickly. Nina Hart kept the reservation summary and pointed out that the extra buffer was intended for cleanup rather than a full rerun. A brief reference to Saffron appeared in the margin as an example of what not to copy from an earlier schedule. The notice closed by asking reviewers to confirm the preferred path before the window opened.


Email Thread - 2026-06-18

This email thread follows the corrective rerun for Project Ravel Grove. The rerun used the repaired configuration and produced a cleaner trace than the stopped opening attempt. One reply points out that the diagnostic path was never meant to be the final answer. Another message says the rerun should be treated as the basis for the summary note. The thread also mentions a small spare allocation for one more verification pass if needed. By the end of the thread, the team agreed to keep the corrective rerun as the reference.


Weekly Report - 2026-07-05

This status memo gives the final Citadel update after the revision. The narrow verification route stayed in place, and the broader option was left behind. The memo says the team still lacked a signed-off report for one side task, so that piece remained open. Lena Ortiz noted that the revision had reduced confusion during review. The closing line confirms that the Citadel workstream was stable even though one follow-up item was unfinished.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-10

Bellwether’s weekly report opens with a reminder that the team was keeping the rerun lane separate from the main review lane. Rin Alvarez handled the resource watch for the batch, and the note says the extra compute was reserved for the cleaner attempt. A brief aside names Borealis only as an old comparison project with no active role here. The report also says the team wanted enough capacity to repeat the test if the first pass looked unstable. That planning note set up the later experiment and review.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-09

The weekly report said Project Jacaranda Junction had moved past the failed attempt and was now tracking the rerun. The rerun used the distilled retrieval path and produced steadier evidence than the older trial. Mira Vale kept the follow-up list organized and flagged a minor wording fix for the review memo. The report also noted that the earlier chunk-based idea remained archived as a rejected option. A brief aside mentioned a different project’s reranking work, but it did not affect Jacaranda’s final status. By week’s end, the team considered the rerun the working baseline for review.


Change Request - 2026-07-03

This request explains why the team replaced the earlier retrieval path after the rerun exposed missed citations. The new plan keeps the same review target but swaps in a more structured evidence pass. A note from the reviewer says the old route was still useful as a fallback, not as the primary standard. The request also mentions that a separate Project Laurel draft used a similar label but was not part of this revision. By the end, the team agreed the updated path should be treated as the default for Aegis. The document closes with a reminder to compare the rerun against the earlier baseline before sign-off.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-15

The Xeric Meadow weekly report opened by saying the project was still watching the evidence lane closely. It mentioned that the first attempt had looked promising but was not the run the team wanted to trust. A short aside said the lighter setup would remain available if the follow-up plan needed a fallback. The report also hinted that another group was dealing with a different issue, so readers should not mix the two stories together. By the end, the note said a formal review would settle which attempt counted.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-14

Project Parallax Lagoon closed the week with a review of the rerun and a short list of remaining edits. The final review favored the narrower calibration pass because it produced steadier feedback than the earlier attempt. Mina Shah's follow-up notes were used to reconcile the comments from the meeting and the incident review. The report says the team did not reopen the unstable path and treated the rerun as the standing reference. A brief mention of Project Quartzite Lagoon appears again, but only as a comparison that was explicitly left out of the final decision.


Email Thread - 2026-06-24

The thread begins with a reminder that the Nightjar Meadow update should follow the review memo rather than the preliminary draft. One reply says the discarded path had looked simpler at first, but the team no longer trusted it after the review. Another message confirms that the replacement choice was the one the reviewer wanted documented. A separate message compares the Nightjar Meadow case with a different project's calibration note, though that comparison was only for context. The thread closes with agreement to keep the follow-up limited to the final recommendation.


Experiment Log - 2026-06-10

This log covers the Monsoon Falcon rerun after the failed salt run was set aside. The rerun produced cleaner evidence links and the review team marked it as the first valid pass. A separate trial for Project Bellwether was recorded in the same notebook but it did not affect Falcon's review. The analyst noted that the earlier pass still helped explain the error pattern even though it was not accepted. The final note says the rerun should be cited when people discuss the project's current status.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-02

The Citadel meeting opened with a debate over whether to keep the old calibration path or switch to a cleaner filter. Someone noted that the draft path had been borrowed from a different project and should not be treated as settled. Project Citadel uses the local alias Rampart in these notes, and the alias stays within the same project story. The group agreed to revisit the choice after the review memo arrived. A brief aside mentioned another project with a similar label, but the team did not adopt that option.


Change Request - 2026-06-15

The change request proposes a corrected rerun for Citadel after the stale handoff was identified. Nia Voss asked that the new pass follow the updated evidence trail and ignore the earlier mistake. The request says the rerun should be reviewed before any broader rollout. A stray note about Project Delta was included as background but did not affect the decision. The document does not name a replacement owner for the rerun.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-03

Project Onyx Kernel entered final status review after the staffing notice was posted. The report repeats that the standby helper was only there in case the main check slipped. It also notes that the core pair handled the review without needing the fallback. A short sidebar mentioned a packaging audit from another project, which did not change the Onyx Kernel count. The status summary kept the same two-person core team as the official figure.


Experiment Log - 2026-05-13

The experiment log for the Quartzite Archive records an initial pass that failed the acceptance screen. After that miss, the team reran the same setup with a cleaner filter and the second pass held. A different model family briefly appeared in the notes, but the log says it was only a comparison point and not the accepted run. The accepted rerun is described as the one that could be carried into review. The log warns that the rejected pass should not be confused with the archive result.


Resource Notice - 2026-05-11

The notice said Project Bellwether would get a small block of shared compute for the next rerun window. Only part of the pool was reserved because the team expected one pass to be discarded as a dry run. Mina Shah asked for enough room to compare the new pipeline with the older backup path. The note warned that the schedule could slip if the rerun needed extra cleanup. A side mention of Project Citadel referred to a separate queue and did not affect the allocation.


Review Memo - 2026-06-11

This memo records the review of the Sycamore Orchard rerun and the reasons it replaced the failed attempt. The rerun used hard-negative mining and did not rely on a reward model. In the same review, the team noted that the earlier pass had broken because the index lookup was incomplete. Rafi Chen recommended keeping the rerun as the reference standard for the orchard storyline. A side note compared it with a different project that had used calibration, but that comparison was not adopted here. The memo ends by saying the team would summarize the rerun in the weekly report after one more check.


Resource Notice - 2026-05-09

The resource notice opened by saying Tern Nimbus needed a short burst of compute for the next validation step. A temporary pool was set aside for the rerun, while the team watched a separate effort that was not part of the decision. The note warned that the slower fallback path should stay untouched unless the rerun failed again. No one expected the initial allocation to become the permanent setup. The notice asked the reviewers to compare the rerun against the older baseline before making a call.


Change Request - 2026-06-12

The change request opens with Project Nightjar Falcon and asks to replace the old retrieval path after reviewers complained about weak coverage. It says the earlier plan relied on a narrow filter, but the Falcon group wanted broader evidence pooling for the next cycle. A separate note about Project Ibis appears in the margin and is not part of the Nightjar decision. The request also mentions that the team would keep the rerun notebook for comparison if the new approach behaved better. The signoff section frames the change as a response to the review rather than a fresh experiment.


Incident Report - 2026-06-03

This note records the retry window for Project Parallax Nimbus and the issues seen during the first pass. The opening run stalled after a cache handoff broke, so the team set that path aside. A later rerun on the same workstream finished cleanly and became the reference point for the review. For the rerun, the group kept the lighter validation pass and dropped the older checksum sweep. One side thread about Project Bellwether stayed in the notes only as a comparison case and did not affect the Parallax decision.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-20

The Meadow notice for Project Aurora Meadow said the team would start with a modest GPU reservation for the next pass. It also said the larger reservation should stay untouched unless the rerun needed extra room. Talia Reed was asked to watch the inventory note and keep the Meadow label visible. The notice mentioned a backup slot for another group, but that detail was not part of Aurora Meadow's plan. The team expected the smaller reservation to be enough for the final check.


Incident Report - 2026-05-30

This report covers the failed pass for Project Daffodil Iris and the reason the team paused. The first run drifted on mixed aliases, so the reviewer marked the output unstable. A fallback path named Cedar was tested, but it produced weaker retrieval traces than the main rerun. The team concluded that the rerun had to wait until the alias mapping was cleaned up. One note says the issue was not with the prompt itself but with how the evidence was merged. After the correction, the report recommends keeping the revised stack and dropping the earlier shortcut.


Change Request - 2026-06-18

The Ultraviolet Circuit change request proposed updating the rerun after the first pass underperformed. The earlier plan had relied on hard-negative mining, but the revision pointed toward hybrid retrieval. The request said the newer path should be paired with query rewriting for the final review. A note warned that the old path could still appear in archived comparisons. The team asked for a clean handoff before the next check. No final approval was recorded in the request itself.


Review Memo - 2026-06-08

The review memo says the Bellwether Archive rerun confirmed the cleaner gate was the better comparison. Priya Sen wrote that the stale label set no longer affected the result once the filter revision was applied. The memo contrasted that outcome with the earlier noisy pass, which had been set aside. It also noted that the neighboring team's spike remained irrelevant to the archive call. The final line records acceptance of the revised path and says no extra comparison was needed.


Incident Report - 2026-06-17

This incident report covers the first start of Project Ravel Grove. The opening attempt ran into a missing-index issue and had to be stopped. A nearby diagnostic path looked clean at first, but it was not the main grove run. The report says the team would retry after correcting the setup. A separate cluster note is mentioned only to show that the problem was local to the grove run. The incident was closed once the retry plan was approved.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-04

This notice covered compute access for the Asterion rerun and a few nearby projects. Node Pine-07 set aside four GPUs for Asterion after the first reservation proved too small. A separate request for Project Saffron was logged but not used for the rerun. The note also recorded that the backup pool stayed untouched in case the revised pass needed another attempt. The final allocation was enough to keep the rerun moving without borrowing from the side note workstreams.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-19

The meeting focused on the Borealis Lagoon rerun and the review threshold that would count as acceptable. Ravi Chen said the earlier pass should stay archived because the unstable run no longer reflected the final decision. After the correction, the group agreed to keep the rerun as the standard for Project Borealis Lagoon. They also compared that standard with an unrelated Galena draft, but the draft was set aside because it belonged to another effort. By the end, the minutes recorded that the lagoon review would use the steadier rerun rather than the discarded first attempt. A note at the bottom mentioned that the Harbor alias was not used in this project and should be ignored.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-30

The weekly report says Delta Kernel has settled on the narrower retrieval sweep. Delta Harbor kept the handoff notes in order through the review. The report explains that the Rowan Bench attempt was rejected because the citation mapping was incomplete. It adds that the revised path is now the one used for the final check. A closing line says the noisy broad sweep is no longer part of the workflow.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-30

This weekly report summarizes the Quartzite Summit measurement work. The cleaner pass finished with steadier readings than the noisy attempt from earlier in the week. The report says the team kept the accepted pass and dropped the shaky baseline. A note in the footer points to a separate review thread for Project Bellwether, but that thread is not part of this summary. The summary also notes that the reserved capacity was enough for the rerun. Nothing in the report suggests another correction is needed.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-12

The team opened by reviewing the Verdant Foundry rollout checklist and the handoff notes from the prior week. Mira Sol kept the follow-up list organized while the group sorted out the first validation pass. An early rerun on the Harbor lane was set aside after the logs showed unstable retrieval traces. The group agreed to keep the alias expansion path in view, but only as a backup until the rerun settled. By the end of the meeting, the team had a short list of fixes for the next check.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-28

Project Citadel’s final status note said the confirmed pass remained the only valid standard. It repeated that the tentative backup path was not to be used in the closing summary. Rina Cole asked for the review memo to be treated as the source of authority. The note also mentioned that Daffodil’s reviewer handled a different queue. No one in the note gave a final answer about the missing side calculation.


Change Request - 2026-06-16

This change request covers the revised plan for Project Ravel Meadow after the incident. The team replaced the shaky pass with a rerun that matched the review checklist more closely. The revised path was accepted because it preserved the evidence trail that the earlier pass had lost. The request also says the old pass should remain archived and not be used for comparison. A final note points to the Meadow alias as the label for the corrected stream.


Review Memo - 2026-07-13

The review memo says the focused rerun finished with six staff members watching the final check. It notes that two people were busy elsewhere, so the smaller review group was expected. Tara Finch summarized the result and said the lean setup was enough for the archive pass. The memo also records that the larger cache plan stayed rejected. A closing remark says the Citadel cycle can move forward with the smaller arrangement.


Review Memo - 2026-06-15

This memo closes the Monsoon Horizon review after the rerun and the resource hold. The failed Cedar pass is treated as invalid, while the Birch pass is the one the team cites as the final standard. The reviewer says the cleaned-up retrieval trace is now the reference for follow-up work. A side remark notes that the Harbor label stayed local and was never used outside the project group. The memo also says the team can proceed with the next check without reopening the old failure.


Email Thread - 2026-06-17

In the cleanup thread, Imani reminded the group that the first reading from Citadel Lagoon had been too rosy. She asked everyone to quote the rerun instead of the earlier draft when summarizing the lagoon status. Tariq replied that the older cache plan should stay in the archive because it no longer matched the final review. The thread also mentions a separate notebook for Project Auroral Drift, which was only referenced as background and not used in the decision. By the end, the team agreed to treat the rerun as the authoritative note.


Change Request - 2026-06-04

This change request records the follow-up adjustments for Project Parallax Meadow after the review meeting. The team agreed to keep the Meadow alias local to this workstream and not reuse any outside naming scheme. The rerun was promoted because the earlier pass had been judged too noisy for a reliable comparison. One proposed adjustment was rejected when it would have hidden the source of the calibration gain. The final note says the revised path should be carried into the next check without the discarded adjustment. The request also mentions that the follow-up list stays with Liora Venn, who organized the review notes.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-17

The Halcyon Lagoon meeting reviewed the planning notes for the next run. The group first discussed a retrieval-heavy setup, but that option was set aside after the checks came back noisy. They then moved toward a lighter alias-expansion path for the Lagoon workstream. A brief mention of the Cedar pilot appeared in the margin, though it was only a comparison point and not the chosen route. The minutes close with a reminder that the later plan should stay aligned with the newest Halcyon draft.


Experiment Log - 2026-04-12

The Quasar Harbor experiment log starts with a rerun that failed to improve the evidence trail. The first draft had used alias expansion, but the rerun showed it was too noisy for the Harbor review. A local note called the follow-up path North Beacon, and that name stayed within Quasar Harbor. The log also mentions a separate calibration test that was not tied to the Harbor decision. After the rerun, the team asked for a cleaner method before the next pass.


Review Memo - 2026-06-11

The Echelon Kernel review memo said the first draft leaned on broad alias expansion and was not the preferred path. Nadia wrote that the team wanted a tighter retrieval route before the final check. The memo mentioned a nearby project lane with a similar review style, but that lane was only background context. By the end of the note, the older draft was marked as provisional rather than final. The memo asked readers to wait for the revised pass before drawing conclusions.


Incident Report - 2026-06-10

The incident report describes why the first Daffodil run was set aside after the team saw unstable outputs during validation. Jonah Pike recorded that the rerun reduced the drift and matched the archive checklist more closely. A side note says a separate Bellwether test had a similar symptom, but that case was handled by another group. The report also states that the noisy run was not reused in the final packet for Project Daffodil Archive. Instead, the rerun was marked as the version to cite in follow-up discussions. One appendix mentions a spare calibration set, yet it was never promoted beyond backup status.


Weekly Report - 2026-05-09

The weekly report said Ypsilon Junction completed the rerun and moved into review without reopening the old dense path. It also noted that the trimmed evidence pass held up better than the archived comparison run. Priya Sen kept the review notes organized and flagged one minor citation gap for correction. The report mentioned that a separate prototype from another stream had been rerun twice and still missed its target, which was only background context. The final status for Ypsilon Junction was marked as ready for sign-off after the correction was applied. No additional schedule change was recorded in this wrap-up.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-12

The review opened with a quick recap of Project Jacaranda Meadow and the earlier retrieval hiccup. Mina Voss said the first attempt stalled because the index bundle was incomplete. The team set aside that path and kept the rerun with the cleaner cache as the working option. A side note mentioned Project Kelpie Meadow, but it was only used as a comparison from another stream. By the end, the group agreed to wait for the experiment log before closing the review.


Review Memo - 2026-06-11

This memo records the final status review for Cascade Iris. It says the noisy draft should be archived while the cleaner revision stays in circulation. The memo also says the old comparison set was useful only as background. A short appendix mentions that the revision review finished after the email thread confirmed the cleaner pass. No extra changes were requested after that confirmation.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-21

The meeting for Project Aurora Grove compared two ways to handle the next review. The earlier dense retrieval idea was discussed, but the group said it no longer fit the project shape. Alias expansion was kept as the working path because it matched the revised notes. Nina Vale summarized the discussion and asked for one more check before closure. A side comment mentioned another lab effort that was still debating its own route. The minutes closed with a reminder that the older idea should not be used as the baseline.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-21

The weekly report gives the final status for Project Fenwick Falcon. It says the broader rollout remained the active plan, and Lantern was still the local alias in use. The report also notes that the narrow rollout was not revived. A separate line says the team is still waiting on one approval before the next step can start. The report closes by saying the current plan is ready, but one follow-up question remains open.


Review Memo - 2026-05-17

This memo records the final check for Project Jacaranda Circuit. The cleaner rerun was accepted as the standard for the next phase. The earlier failure stayed in the record only as a warning sign, not as the chosen baseline. For the closeout, the team kept the alias expansion note attached to the rerun packet. The memo also says the review should cite the rerun before mentioning any older attempt. No new obstacle appeared after the final check.


Review Memo - 2026-06-14

The memo reviewed Project Lattice Junction and said the team was comparing a fresh rerun against an earlier failed attempt. Talia North was named the note keeper for Lattice Gate and was asked to archive the decision trail. The older chunking path was described as useful for testing, but the group no longer treated it as final. The memo said the distilled path gave cleaner evidence after the revision. A brief reference to another project’s reranking choice was included only to separate the two workstreams. The review ended with a request to document the rerun’s outcome in the weekly report.


Email Thread - 2026-05-26

The thread follows up on Project Yonder after the review memo landed. One message says the rerun should be treated as the working version because the first pass never stabilized. Another reply notes that the archived notes now point to the same cleaned evidence trail described in the memo. A brief aside compares Yonder with a separate testbed that still had a noisy cache, but that comparison was only for context. The final message says the closeout can wait until the short status note is posted. The sender also reminds the group that the old ordering issue should not be reopened unless the archive shows a new mismatch.


Review Memo - 2026-07-03

The review memo for Project Zircon Foundry compares the early draft with the corrected calibration path. Noah Kim noted that the first draft was rejected because it depended on a brittle lookup table. The memo says the team kept the later setup because it matched the cleaner retrieval lane. A side note refers to the Zircon Harbor alias, which was used only inside this project. The earlier draft was marked invalid and was excluded from the final recommendation.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-19

The weekly report said Daffodil Cobalt had moved past the noisy first draft and was now following the corrected naming path. The rerun was marked clean, while the earlier bright-label attempt remained archived as a false start. Mara Venn kept the follow-up list organized and flagged the same alias wording for the final review packet. The report also noted that a separate pilot on another team had finished earlier, but it was not part of the Daffodil decision. The team expected the next status note to confirm the alias cleanup rather than reopen the old path.


Resource Notice - 2026-05-14

The notice says Onyx Cobalt will keep a small compute pool reserved for the next validation pass. Two allocation entries were logged for the main workstream, while a separate team asked about a nearby rack that did not end up in the count. Leah Gomez asked that the accepted allocation be tagged for the rerun rather than for the discarded draft. A side remark mentions a different project with a similar storage need, but it was not part of the Onyx tally. The notice ends by saying the reservation is enough for the planned review cycle.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-11

The Bellwether handoff began with a discussion about who should keep the retrieval notes current during the next cycle. A local alias, Project Aurora, was mentioned as the active workstream inside Bellwether, while a stray reference to Nereid was treated as an outside comparison. The group agreed that the first draft of the handoff was too vague for the review queue. One attendee suggested waiting until the memo arrived before naming the final owner. The minutes ended with a reminder that the follow-up list needed a single point of contact.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-05-20

The Sequoia Harbor follow-up meeting centered on whether the new review standard should replace the older draft. The group said the threshold search path matched the memo's recommendation better than the earlier contrastive tuning plan. Ari Dalen summarized the evidence trail and kept the notes aligned with the revised decision. The team also mentioned a separate calibration test from another workstream, but it was not adopted for Sequoia Harbor. The meeting closed with agreement to write the final status around the revised standard. No extra rerun was requested because the current evidence was already consistent.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-21

The weekly report says Halcyon Falcon finished the week with the approved resource plan in place. It restates that three accelerators were committed and one remained reserved, giving the team a total of four units in the working plan. The writer notes that the placeholder request is no longer the active record. A brief aside says the unrelated project that had overbooked spare capacity was not counted in this total. The recap also says the rerun stayed on schedule after the final approval. No additional changes were logged before close.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-25

The minutes for Xeric Nimbus say the team met after the change request was approved. They refer to Xeric Dune when talking through the follow-up plan. The group agreed that the rerun would be checked before any broader summary was written. A brief aside about Project Tern was recorded, but it was only background chatter. The minutes end with the reminder that the revised checkpoint is now the active one.


Experiment Log - 2026-05-07

The rerun log recorded two calibration passes for Project Asterion, both using the same evaluation bundle. The first pass drifted early and was flagged as invalid because the score jumped around near the end. The second pass stayed consistent and became the reference run for the rest of the review. Felix Lind wrote that the team would compare the rerun against the previous notes before sending a final update. A brief footer mentioned a separate Project Bellwether test that had been paused for unrelated scheduling reasons.


Review Memo - 2026-06-12

The conflict memo explained that the placeholder booking had caused confusion during the lagoon planning call. Nia Brooks said the shared slot should belong to the validation rerun because the earlier hold was never meant to be final. A different group had assumed the window was free, which created the dispute. The memo also mentioned that Project Citadel was dealing with a separate queue issue, but that was unrelated. By the end of the discussion, the team agreed to keep the slot with Kelpie Lagoon. The note emphasized that the placeholder should be ignored in later summaries.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-13

The weekly report says the Equinox Harbor team reviewed the reserved lane and compared it with the earlier noisy pass. Mira wrote that the cleaner check was better behaved, though one edge case still needed another look. Arun noted that the harbor workstream should keep the follow-up list short so the next review stays focused. The report also mentions that the earlier noisy pass was kept only as a reference point. No replacement plan is announced here.

No replacement plan is announced here.


Weekly Report - 2026-05-24

This report covers the latest sweep for Project Yonder and the follow-up after the first pass missed the mark. The team first tried a calibration-heavy route, but that attempt was set aside after the review flagged unstable evidence ordering. A later rerun kept the same retrieval pool and produced cleaner ranking behavior for the Yonder notebook. The notes mention that the rerun was checked against the old checklist before anyone treated it as final. One side thread asked whether the auxiliary cache should be expanded, but that idea stayed local and was not adopted for the main flow.


Incident Report - 2026-06-27

The incident report says the Bellwether Matrix rerun stalled when the queue became crowded. Bellwether Harbor appears again as the active alias, while Cedar Quay is described as a comparison lane only. The stalled attempt was traced to a temporary shortage in the shared pool. After the stall, the team kept the smaller allocation for the valid rerun and dropped the older setup. The report says the next check should use the revised queue plan rather than the abandoned one.


Incident Report - 2026-05-04

This incident report covers the failed rerun that interrupted Project Asterion's review cycle. The first attempt stalled when the alias table pointed to the wrong local tag and the validation step stopped early. Rina Vale wrote that the issue was not in the scoring rule but in the handoff list used for the rerun. After the correction, the team repeated the test and kept the narrower scope from the revised plan. The report also mentioned that a separate Meridian example had been discussed only as a cautionary comparison. No other project in the note was treated as the source of truth for Asterion's rerun.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-21

Project Galena Lagoon finished the week with the alias-expansion route in place for the main review stream. The report says the earlier compact retriever was left behind after the rerun showed unstable outputs. The final review was written from the later pass, not from the discarded attempt. A short note records that the Galena team kept one backup path for reference, but it was not used in the signoff. The report closes by saying the Lagoon workstream is ready for the next handoff.


Resource Notice - 2026-04-01

This resource notice records the Fenwick Grove allocation plan for the spring test window. The notice says Node Maple-01 set aside three GPUs for the Grove workstream. A line about Project Halcyon mentions a separate reservation, but it is not tied to Fenwick. The allocation was meant to support the first calibration pass rather than the later rerun. The notice does not say whether the reserved capacity was fully used. A final reminder says the team should verify the queue before starting the run.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-13

This notice confirms a new resource assignment for Project Wildfire Delta after the stalled pass. Node Willow-05 was set aside for the corrected rerun, and the team kept the earlier Sycamore attempt on record only as the failed baseline. The notice also states that another project, Project Wildfire Delta North, was not part of the same reservation. Mina Shah requested that the rerun receive the full allocation rather than a partial slot. The reservation was described as temporary until the weekly report could confirm usage. No model choice is named in the notice.

No model choice is named in the notice.


Weekly Report - 2026-05-15

The weekly update confirms that Bellwether kept the extra-capacity rerun as the reference point. It says the smaller draft remained archived because it had failed the required check. Rin Vale wrote that the team considered the matter closed once the accepted pass was recorded. The report also notes that the local alias Bellwether was preferred in follow-up messages. A brief comparison with Meridian was included only as a distraction from the capacity issue.


Review Memo - 2026-06-26

The Ravel Orchard memo said the repaired pass should be treated as the authoritative result. It also explained that the earlier failure was useful only for diagnosing the cache problem. Tara warned that a side path from another group should not be cited as evidence for the orchard handoff. The memo asked the team to keep the corrected notes and discard the draft built around the failed run. A brief appendix listed the review items that still needed sign-off.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-24

The weekly report for Project Aurora Falcon said the team had finished the latest rerun and was ready to summarize it. The older comparison path was described as useful for context, but it was no longer treated as the main line. A separate effort from another project was mentioned as a reminder not to mix evidence trails. The report said the Falcon team would carry forward the cleaner rerun as the status baseline. One follow-up item about a late note remained open at the end of the week.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-04-21

The meeting opened with planning notes for Project Aegis Ledger. The team considered a reward-driven review path, but the discussion shifted toward a steadier voting-based check. A follow-up note said the Ledger branch should avoid confusing the new pass with the older pilot. The group also flagged a related study that had already been described as using calibrated voting. By the end, the minutes treated the steadier check as the preferred path for the next rerun.


Change Request - 2026-06-03

This memo lays out the next pass for Project Jacaranda Echo after the first evidence sweep looked thin. The team agreed to stop leaning on alias expansion and try a denser retrieval path for the rerun. A note in the margin says the earlier route was kept only as a fallback in case the new pass stalled. For the handoff, Mira kept the follow-up list tied to the Jacaranda Echo workstream and flagged the next review as the main checkpoint. The memo also warns that a neighboring effort with a similar cadence should not be used as a reference point for this cycle.


Incident Report - 2026-06-24

The incident report says the Monsoon Matrix rerun stalled when the checkpoint bundle no longer matched the cached state. After the mismatch, the operator switched to a fresh bundle and repeated the same job instead of changing the review set. That second pass completed, but the notes warn that one noisy segment still needed manual inspection. The report also mentions a nearby team using a different alias, though its issue was unrelated to this stall. A final note says the rerun was left in a usable state for the follow-up memo.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-24

Project Zircon Kernel closed the week with the rerun as the accepted result. The report says the earlier invalid attempt was useful only as a warning, not as the final reference. The final pass was described as steadier, and the reviewers preferred it over the noisy start. A short note mentions that the backup trace stayed archived but was not promoted. The document closes by saying the project can now move on to a routine check rather than another recovery cycle.


Review Memo - 2026-05-22

The review memo says the corrected run remained the preferred version, but the source of the first bottleneck was still open. Leah North’s notes are cited again because they matched the incident follow-up. The memo also states that the team had not agreed on a final explanation for the noisy early rerun. One line mentions a different project, Borealis, only to show that its issue had a separate root cause. The closing line says the corrected run was still the preferred choice.


Review Memo - 2026-06-14

This memo reviews the Daffodil Matrix rerun after the incident was contained. The stable rerun matched the expected pattern and replaced the earlier noisy attempt. Reviewers agreed that the fallback option was only a temporary bridge, not the final standard. The memo also records that the team kept the lighter path for the next cycle. In the final status note, Daffodil Matrix was marked ready for the next handoff.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-20

This weekly report covers the handoff and closure for Project Citadel Nimbus. The revised handoff was accepted after the memo confirmed that no further rerun was needed. The report repeats that the Citadel Harbor review used the two-GPU support window and then wrapped up cleanly. An earlier plan had left the team waiting for another check, but that plan was superseded. The final line says the project is now in closed status.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-17

The final wrap-up for Project Xeric Archive confirms the clean check stayed as the official record. North Dock 2 continued to reserve two GPUs for that check, and the backup path kept its one-GPU note. The draft owner note was kept only as historical context. Priya Nair asked for the final summary to emphasize the clean check over the draft. No further corrections were listed.

No further corrections were listed.


Incident Report - 2026-04-18

This incident report covers the Echelon Grove rerun and the operational issue that interrupted it. The first attempt on the Poplar node stalled because the cache layer was configured incorrectly. After that failure, the team repeated the run with a cleaned setup and kept the corrected variant for review. A side note mentions Project Daffodil Grove as a different effort that had already moved past its own rerun. The report says the corrected pass was useful enough to keep, while the failed attempt was archived only as a warning. No other Echelon issue matched the cache problem.


Incident Report - 2026-05-19

The incident report for Project Daffodil Nimbus described an early retrieval pass that failed before the handoff. Kira Frost said the failure came from a noisy validation sweep, not from the final review path. After that, the team reran the job with the corrected settings and kept the cleaner output. A note in the thread mentioned that Project Bellwether had a similar issue, but its fix was unrelated to Daffodil's rerun. The follow-up message asked everyone to treat the rerun as the authoritative result for the episode. No further rollback was requested once the cleaner pass was confirmed.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-04

The Fable meeting covered the rerun and the comparison check from Equinox. Noah Chen said the rerun confirmed the newer calibration path. He also noted that the stable route stayed available as a fallback. The group briefly contrasted this with Project Nereid, but only as a side example. The minutes say the rerun settled the earlier disagreement. The team agreed to move forward with the confirmed path.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-03

The kickoff for Jacaranda Delta focused on keeping the retrieval trail traceable for the next review. Mina Shah opened by saying the team would treat the early calibration as provisional rather than final. A brief note on the side mentioned that the first pass under the Jacaranda banner had used Lumen-3B, but the group did not want to anchor decisions to that run. Instead, the discussion centered on a cleaner rerun tied to the Delta-branded workstream. The minutes also recorded a reminder to separate the valid evidence path from an older noisy path that had confused the draft summary. By the end, the team agreed to revisit the calibration notes after the rerun before writing the final memo.


Email Thread - 2026-06-13

In the thread, Priya Rao told the team to treat the signed memo as the final word. She said the follow-up list should stay with the Bellwether side rather than bounce back to the earlier draft owner. Another reply confirmed that Aurora was still the name used inside the project notes. The same reply dismissed the stray Nereid mention as unrelated background. The thread ended after the group aligned on the signed authority and stopped debating the handoff.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-05-16

These minutes summarize the handoff discussion for Project Jacaranda Circuit. Mina Rao said the older dense retrieval path was no longer the reference point because the rerun had behaved more predictably. The group agreed to keep the fallback note visible in case the next pass drifted again. One attendee suggested comparing the rerun against the failed attempt rather than against the original prototype. By the end, the review list centered on the rerun and its cleaner output. A separate note mentioned Project Bellwether only as a contrast case for another team.


Incident Report - 2026-06-05

The final Caldera review says the revised handoff resolved the ambiguity from the earlier pass. Priya Nair confirmed that the rerun passed once the team used the tighter review step. The report explains that the broad path had been rejected because it produced too many unclear cases. After the revision, the team kept the cleaner handoff as the ongoing standard. The closing line notes that the earlier noisy pass remains in the archive only for comparison.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-14

This weekly report covers Project Bellwether Meadow and its current coordination status. Asteria Vale was listed as the person keeping the review notes organized for Bellwether Harbor. The earlier plan called for a broad evidence sweep, but that was narrowed after the first discussion. The revised plan focused on a smaller verification pass tied to the Meadow review. The report also mentions that the team expected one more round before closing the week.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-21

This weekly report covers the follow-up run for Project Halcyon Grove. The rerun used the updated path and avoided the instability seen earlier. A quick comparison with Project Ibis Grove was included, but that project had a different review target. The report also notes that the old path was retained only for archival reference. By the end of the week, the rerun was treated as the working version.


Incident Report - 2026-06-04

The rerun for Asterion failed early because the indexing cache did not refresh in time. The failure did not affect the archived baseline, which remained available for comparison. After the cache issue was found, the team paused the noisy path and prepared a cleaner recovery attempt. A brief mention of Meridian appeared only as background from an unrelated test lane. The report closes by noting that the recovery plan would be checked against the meeting’s simpler option.


Review Memo - 2026-06-22

This memo records the final review for Project Verdant Delta after the corrected pass. The review standard came from alias expansion, not from the earlier temporal filtering draft. The memo says the rerun was the first usable result and that the failed attempt should be ignored for signoff. Mina Shah's notes were kept as the reference trail for the handoff. A short appendix contrasted the stable Verdant Delta path with the unrelated Project Verdant Grove draft. The final status was approved once the corrected run matched the review checklist.


Incident Report - 2026-05-07

This report records the failure that interrupted Project Asterion Iris during the first validation attempt. The error appeared after a narrow context window clipped the supporting note set, which made the scorer reject the output. Mara Venn traced the problem to the older retrieval path and said that option should not be used again. A side experiment nicknamed Harbor Lane completed, but it was not the version that caused the interruption. The report recommends keeping the rerun as the authority for the final status once the corrected pass finishes. Jonah Pike added that the next check should compare the corrected pass against the failed one so the team can confirm the fix.


Email Thread - 2026-06-16

The Delta Grove thread began after an unstable validation pass interrupted the first review attempt. Nadia Vale replied that the team should keep the alias-first labeling instead of reverting to the older shorthand. A separate draft proposed a compact summary format, but that draft was not adopted for the main thread. The message chain said the rerun would be easier to compare if the evidence order stayed consistent. Nadia Vale also noted that another project's cleaner test run was not a good comparison point for Delta Grove. The thread ended with the revision still open.


Incident Report - 2026-06-05

The rerun for Project Parallax Circuit started cleanly but then exposed a logging mismatch in the evidence trail. Tariq Bloom said the mismatch came from an outdated handoff note rather than from the new calibration steps. The team paused the run, corrected the note sequence, and repeated the check with the same reviewer group. That second pass reached the expected threshold and was treated as the valid result. A nearby experiment for Project Bellwether Harbor was mentioned because it had a similar symptom, but its fix was different and not used here. The report closed by saying the earlier failure should remain on record only as a discarded attempt.


Change Request - 2026-06-25

The change request for Project Heliotrope Harbor proposed moving away from the heavier setup after a rough trial. The writer said the first pass had been noisy and should not be treated as the baseline. A note in the margin mentioned that another project had already settled on a different path, but that was only background. The request asked for a cleaner rerun so the team could compare the new pass with the old one. The closing line framed the Harbor effort as a short revision cycle rather than a full redesign.


Review Memo - 2026-05-26

This memo states that Project Citadel now treats the broader path as the review standard. The earlier narrow choice was mentioned only as a comparison point. The memo says the change was accepted because it aligned better with the evidence trail. Sera Bloom signed off on the note after checking the latest comments. Nothing in the memo suggests a return to the discarded option.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-12

Parallax Matrix ended the week with the rerun accepted and the earlier failed pass marked as non-final. The report says the team kept the alias-expansion track and did not reopen the dense-retrieval option. A separate note records that the comparison set included one invalid attempt and one valid attempt, but only the valid one stayed in the summary. The status update also mentions that the follow-up list is now owned by the same core group that ran the review. Nothing in the report suggests a new obstacle after the rerun was accepted. The final line says the project is ready for the next review cycle.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-22

The final Fenwick status report said the kernel review was closed out successfully. It confirmed that the rerun, not the noisy first attempt, set the final record. Lin wrote that the team could release the reservation once the report was filed. The report also noted that 2 GPUs had been enough for the corrected pass. The closing summary said the workstream was complete and no further fixes were planned.


Change Request - 2026-06-20

This change request records the final revision for Borealis Lagoon after the unstable attempt was rejected. The requested update tightened the evidence pass and kept the rerun aligned with the review memo. The requester said the revised approach should replace the earlier path because it matched the latest discussion. A small side note warned that Project Delta Lagoon was following a different schedule and was not the source of this revision. The signoff section names the lagoon rerun as the version that should move forward. One line also states that the final packet would be checked again before circulation.


Resource Notice - 2026-05-24

The resource notice for Project Ultraviolet Meadow announced that the team had one spare lab slot for the next validation pass. It also said the slot would stay reserved until the review memo confirmed the final path. The local alias Ultraviolet Harbor appeared in the note so the operations team would keep the same label. A different team’s reservation was mentioned for comparison, but it did not affect the Meadow schedule. The notice asked the group to wait for the closing report before reusing the slot.


Review Memo - 2026-06-04

This memo reviews the corrected method for Project Echelon Iris after the earlier tally was questioned. It confirms that threshold search replaced the older voting setup for the final evaluation. The memo says the Raven branch stayed only as a contrast case and was not used in the accepted result. Rina Park signed off on the revised notes after checking the alias cleanup. A brief appendix points out that the first count and the final count no longer matched. The memo closes by saying the corrected version is the one to cite for the Iris project.


Experiment Log - 2026-06-01

This log records the first Ibis Archive trial and the follow-up rerun. The initial pass failed after a missing input bundle interrupted the archive check. A corrected rerun was scheduled so the team could verify the records without the missing bundle. The log contrasts that rerun with an unrelated archive effort that had already reached review. The team kept the same reviewer for both passes so the comparison would stay clean.


Email Thread - 2026-06-24

The Ravel Delta email thread starts with a plan to keep the lighter retrieval path for the next review. Mira Kestrel wrote that the early draft for the project used a broader evidence pool, but the group had already seen better behavior from the narrower path. The alias used in the thread was Kestrel Harbor, and the note warned not to mix it up with a different side task called Harbor Finch. One reply said the first draft was only a placeholder and should not be treated as the final direction. Another message asked for a short rerun to confirm the cleaner result before the handoff closed. The thread also mentions that the broader pool was kept only as a backup reference.


Review Memo - 2026-06-26

The decision record for Bellwether Horizon separates the final ruling from earlier trial notes. Dr. Julian Gray is named as the lead who signed off on the project direction. The memo says the working method shifted from temporal filtering to alias expansion. A side remark explains that the failed reranking pass should not be used as the standard. The closing line points readers back to the later rerun when they need the authoritative version.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-05-19

The meeting opened with a status recap for Verdant Echo and a reminder that the team was comparing early trial notes with the later rerun. Rina Holt was named the retrieval lead for Verdant Echo, and the group kept referring to her as the person organizing follow-up notes. The first pass used a compact reranker, but the discussion flagged it as provisional because the validation readout looked unstable. By the end of the call, the team agreed to keep the alias-based route under review instead of locking in the earlier path. A separate note mentioned that another project had a deadline adjustment, but that item was only background noise for this discussion.


Review Memo - 2026-06-08

The memo for Zircon Circuit compared two candidate paths for the next review cycle. One path used tighter filtering and was described as the older fallback. The newer route kept the same retrieval lane but added a cleaner handoff step. The reviewers said the fallback path looked familiar, yet it was not the one they wanted to keep. A note at the end asked for the final writeup to mention the handoff step, not the discarded fallback. The memo closed by saying the choice would be confirmed after a short rerun.


Review Memo - 2026-06-23

The review memo for Zircon Iris compared the accepted retrieval route with the earlier shortcut and found the shortcut too brittle. It said the alias-aware path matched the evidence notes, while the rejected option only matched the first draft. The memo also noted that another project in the batch had changed course for unrelated reasons, which should not be mixed into this decision. The reviewer concluded that the final standard should remain the alias-aware route for the project. A short appendix reminded readers that the discussion was about the reroute, not about compute provisioning.


Change Request - 2026-06-13

This change request records the decision for Project Ultraviolet Echo after the comparison review. The request keeps the voting approach and drops the pooling path as the backup only. It says the earlier pooling note should not be treated as the final standard. The request also refers back to the memo so the team can trace why the revision was needed. A short note says the final decision came after the reviewer's follow-up questions were answered. The document closes by marking the revised path as ready for the next run.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-21

The weekly report said the cleaner rerun finished with fewer spurious hits. Lena Hart kept the review comments grouped for the Citadel team. The report endorsed the stable screening step and treated the brittle filter as retired. It also noted that the initial shortcut should not guide future checks. A short aside compared the outcome with Project Xeric, which was still waiting on its own review. The report did not list the exact follow-on owner for the next phase.


Incident Report - 2026-06-12

The first Daffodil Horizon trial stalled when the validation curve became erratic during the late pass. The team had tried a broader retrieval path, but that setup was dropped after the instability showed up. A follow-up note said the rerun would keep the same corpus but tighten the filtering step. One engineer suggested borrowing a pattern from a different project, yet the group kept the change local to Daffodil Horizon. By the end of the report, the rerun was marked as the preferred path for the next review.


Experiment Log - 2026-06-05

The rerun log for Jacaranda Delta captured a cleaner retrieval pass than the earlier trial. This time the evidence set was trimmed so that the noisy citations from the provisional run would not dominate the output. After the trim, the team marked the rerun as the first result they were willing to trust. A side comment noted that the older calibration had looked promising at first, but it was no longer the reference point. The log also mentioned that the rerun kept the same review target while changing the retrieval path. No new blocker appeared, so the team moved on to drafting the status update.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-16

The final status meeting for Ibis Nimbus reviewed the successful rerun and the earlier unstable trial. Tomas Ilyan said the rerun became the reference point because it cleared the instability seen in the first pass. He also noted that the earlier trial stayed in the log only as a cautionary example. The team agreed that the project was ready for closeout once the report was filed. A side discussion about another team's watch schedule was left unresolved.


Incident Report - 2026-06-05

The rerun for Borealis Echo completed after the first pass stalled on a parsing glitch. Lena Park recorded that the rerun recovered the evidence trail and avoided the earlier false start. The report notes that the older attempt was not used for the final review because it mixed two incompatible labels. After that correction, the Echo team treated the rerun as the authoritative run for the project note. A separate sandbox job on a neighboring stream failed for a different reason and was left out of the decision. The incident closes by saying the clean rerun supported the later review memo without further edits.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-22

Project Caldera Harbor closed the week with the revised pass still holding and the earlier failure no longer driving the plan. The report says the harbor team summarized the incident, the rerun, and the remaining checks in one compact update. A final note from Mira says the team now treats the revised path as the reference for follow-up work. The old attempt is mentioned only as a cautionary example for the next review. No new obstacle was reported after the rerun review.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-03

This notice reserves support for the Onyx Delta rerun and lists the temporary resources available to the team. The notice says the rerun can use two GPUs for the short validation window. A margin note says the smaller backup run should not be counted as the main proof. The same note warns that another project's queue should not borrow this reservation. The support window is described as enough for one clean repeat and a brief review.


Weekly Report - 2026-05-27

Bellwether spent the week reorganizing its intake desk after the earlier coordinator stepped back. The report says Mina Vale kept the follow-up list moving while the team tested a lighter triage path. A temporary note warned that the old queue labels were still visible in one draft, but they were not meant to survive the handoff. The writer also mentioned that Project Citadel had a separate review and should not be mixed into Bellwether's records. By the end of the week, the team expected the handoff to be judged by who could keep the list organized, not by who drafted the first version.


Review Memo - 2026-06-26

This review memo records the final decision for Project Kelpie Matrix after the comparison packet arrived. The willow path became the standing choice because it survived the rerun and met the verification rule. The cedar path remained documented as the earlier option that looked promising but did not hold up. The memo also notes that the final call followed the written comparison rather than the meeting's first impression. No further revision was requested after approval.


Review Memo - 2026-06-02

The Aurora Echo memo opened with a status check for the current review cycle. Tessa Rune was listed as the person keeping the revision notes tidy for Project Aurora Echo. The team first expected to close the review after one pass, but that plan was later adjusted. A correction note said the older scorecard had been set aside once the rerun produced cleaner evidence. The memo also referred to a companion project that was still waiting on its own update, which was only a side remark.


Review Memo - 2026-06-16

The review memo opens Project Ibis Lagoon's source dispute for the latest draft. One reviewer favored the earlier retrieval summary, but another pointed out that it came from a noisy pass. The memo says the cleaner alias-expansion notes should guide the Lagoon revision instead. A reference to the Marlin sandbox appears in passing, though it was not part of the final decision. The memo ends by asking the team to keep the dispute tied to the newest Ibis notes.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-18

This weekly report summarizes Ibis Junction's resource use and the final verification round. Two GPUs were assigned to the verification step, and the team kept the rerun as the reference point. The report says the earlier failure remained in the archive, but it was no longer part of the active plan. A short update notes that the verification pass did not introduce a new method, only a cleaner confirmation of the same result. The report also points out that the workstream's shorthand was easy to confuse with another local alias, so the full name should be retained in summaries. By week's end, the final verification was treated as complete.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-15

The weekly report says Lena Ortiz is now keeping the Quartzite Nimbus queue organized. Mina Hart remains listed only as the person from the earlier provisional plan. The report also notes that the queue was quiet after the correction landed. A short comparison with Project Ravel Nimbus appears in the margin, but it does not change the owner record. The team expects the next review to move smoothly under the corrected handoff.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-11

The meeting opened with a planning discussion for Project Cascade Falcon. The group reviewed a failed attempt that had stalled during validation and then turned to a more stable reroute. A note in the room referred to the local alias Rivergate, which stayed tied to Cascade Falcon throughout the discussion. One participant argued for a broader search pass, but the team parked that idea after comparing it with the reroute. The minutes ended with the reroute marked as the preferred path for the project.


Review Memo - 2026-06-26

The review memo confirms that Citadel kept the broader evidence pooling path. It explains that the narrow alias pass was rejected because it missed too many links in the rerun. The memo says the final status was stable and no further revision was requested. Citadel’s last note is that the broader path will remain the standard for the next stage. A brief comparison with Project Aurora appears only as a background example.


Experiment Log - 2026-06-18

This log captures the dry-run sequence for Xeric Matrix. The first attempt on the dune index stalled when the memory pool was too small. A later rerun switched to the compact retrieval path and completed without errors. The nearby Asterion testbed is mentioned only as a comparison point for a different branch. The log also notes that the compact path was kept for the next evaluation round.


Incident Report - 2026-06-18

The Sycamore Horizon team recorded a failed retrieval pass after the first indexing attempt stalled on a missing index. That invalid pass was set aside before the follow-up run began. In the rerun, the team kept the alias expansion path in place for a short check. The notes say the rerun was only for diagnosis and not the final approach. A later review pointed back to the Horizon project as the one that needed the cleaner lookup flow.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-13

Project Borealis Beacon closed the week with the rerun still pending, but the team had settled on the stable retrieval track. The final review kept the denser path and dropped the experimental detour from the active plan. A small resource note said the reserve was enough for one more attempt if the queue stayed quiet. Mira Sol's checklist was attached to the status update so the follow-up would stay organized. The report also mentioned that the Beacon workstream remained under Project Borealis rather than any other project name. The week ended without a new failure, which made the earlier incident the main reference point.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-15

Citadel finished the week with the stronger retrieval path as the working standard. The report credited the corrective rerun for resolving the instability seen in the first trial. Nadia Ortiz wrote that the archived shortcut was no longer part of active work. The final status was marked as ready for review after the rerun passed. The report also noted that the earlier trial still mattered as the reason for the change.


Email Thread - 2026-06-09

The follow-up thread for Zircon Circuit said the rerun had confirmed the newer route. The sender explained that the older fallback still worked, but it was left out of the final package. They asked the team to standardize on the route with the handoff step. A copied note from another group mentioned a different circuit with a stronger throughput figure, which was not part of this decision. The thread ended with a reminder to update the shared summary before the next meeting.


Review Memo - 2026-06-05

This review memo summarizes the Ibis Beacon status check after the setup limit notice. The discarded arrangement is mentioned only to explain why the team stayed with the leaner option. The memo says the current pass is the one the reviewers should treat as authoritative. Lina Cho handled the written recap for the Ibis Harbor alias and kept the notes in order. No alternate project identity is treated as the main source in this memo.


Change Request - 2026-06-11

This change request proposed trimming the shared index for Project Kelpie Junction before the next rerun. The earlier broad index was described as the source of the noisy result. A small test pass completed after the trim and looked more stable than the discarded attempt. The request warned not to treat the invalid attempt as the approved baseline. It also referenced a separate project that had already finalized its own review memo, which did not alter Kelpie’s plan. The final line asked operations to keep the rerun window open until the report was signed off.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-05-04

The Asterion group opened by reviewing the rerun checklist for the claim screen and agreed the first pass was only a rehearsal. A skeptical note warned that the older setting had been copied forward from a separate effort and should not be treated as final. The team chose a tighter rerun path for Project Asterion, with the alias Nova kept local to that same workstream. One attendee flagged a mismatch between the draft labels and the review memo, so the group set aside the draft for later correction. By the end of the meeting, the rerun was scheduled to be checked again after the log file was refreshed.


Review Memo - 2026-06-10

The review memo opened by saying the Echelon Cobalt draft still contained an early retrieval shortcut. Jonah Pike noted that the shortcut helped the first pass look tidy, but it did not hold up under the later check. The memo compared that draft against a stricter revision that kept the same project scope but changed the working notes. A brief sidebar mentioned a different team using a similar shortcut, though that case was not part of Echelon's decision. The closing line asked for the final packet to follow the stricter revision rather than the draft shortcut. The memo also warned that any later summary should avoid blending the two versions together.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-05-11

The team opened by revisiting the Sycamore Nimbus calibration plan and the reasons the first pass was not trusted. One candidate setting was dropped after it drifted during the dry run, so the group kept the rerun as the working path. Mara Ilyan noted that the labeled review set stayed with the Sycamore line, while the neighboring efforts were only mentioned as distractions. The minutes also record that the rerun would keep the smaller batch size and avoid the unstable scheduler. By the end of the discussion, the team agreed to compare the rerun against the earlier pass before signing off.


Experiment Log - 2026-05-11

This log summarizes the rerun for Verdant Circuit after the first retrieval path proved unreliable. The team first tried a broad fusion approach, but the evidence set was too noisy for the review packet. The rerun switched to a tighter retrieval setup and kept the same benchmark bundle for comparison. A smaller node pool was reserved for the rerun, while the earlier attempt had been left in the notes as invalid. The final pass produced stable outputs that were carried into the later meeting.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-15

These minutes summarize the Delta Circuit method review for the late-June planning meeting. The team first discussed a chunked retrieval path, then moved toward a hybrid retrieval option after the earlier approach looked brittle. They used the local alias Delta Harbor in the room notes so the circuit would not be confused with another project. One speaker referenced a separate study that used structured prompting, but that reference stayed outside the decision. The group agreed to revisit the choice after the rerun results arrived.


Email Thread - 2026-06-10

This email thread follows the Tern Beacon planning discussion after the draft path was questioned. Owen Pike argued that the lighter review pass should stay in place until the evidence bundle was cleaned up. Nadia Cho replied that the older shortcut should remain off the table because it skipped too many checks. The thread also mentions a parallel team with a similar label, but that group was not part of Beacon. By the end of the exchange, the team agreed to wait for a resource update before rerunning anything.


Incident Report - 2026-06-11

The first Asterion pass did not complete cleanly because the validation stage became unstable before scoring finished. The team noted that the failure happened after the compact pipeline had already produced partial outputs, so the logs were still useful for diagnosis. Asterion's engineers wrote that the rerun should not reuse the same settings, since the earlier path had likely masked the real issue. Bellwether was again mentioned only as a comparison label, but it was not the active project under review. The report closes by recommending a second attempt once the input checks are tightened. No final acceptance was recorded in this report, only the need to revisit the approach.


Review Memo - 2026-05-19

The memo for Project Citadel said the corrected rerun became the standard for the final review. Felix Lind explained that the broken branch was kept only for recordkeeping. The team agreed the remaining work was cleanup rather than another redesign. Mina Shah added that the final status would be shared after the cleanup check. Project Daffodil was named in a side note about room availability, not in the decision itself.


Resource Notice - 2026-05-14

This notice tracks shared compute for Bellwether Echo's next rerun. Node Juniper-06 set aside four GPUs for the project after the planning call. A side note mentioned that another team had already reserved the same window for a different effort, so the reservation would need care. The notice also warned that the older draft used a heavier setup that was not the preferred path anymore. Bellwether Echo kept the reservation because the rerun still needed a clean slot. A separate alias appeared in the margin, but it belonged to a different project story.


Review Memo - 2026-06-18

This memo gives the final status for Delta Circuit after the revision and rerun. It says the hybrid retrieval choice is the authority for the project now. The memo repeats that Delta Harbor is the local alias used in the circuit notes. A contrast with another project's chunking study is mentioned, but that comparison does not change the ruling here. The memo closes by saying the earlier brittle path should be treated as superseded.


Email Thread - 2026-06-09

Mina Shah wrote that Daffodil Beacon should keep the rerun notes in one place so the next check would not repeat the earlier mistake. She said the final pass used River-3B after the unstable run was dropped from consideration. The message also pointed out that the older setup had consumed extra compute without producing a usable score. A separate reply about Project Kelpie referenced a different dataset and was only an aside. The thread closed by asking for a short review memo once the results were confirmed. One teammate replied that the Beacon alias should be used in the memo, not the longer formal label.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-16

These minutes cover the correction discussion for Ultraviolet Beacon after the uncertain first pass. Rhea Malik said the rerun should compare the cleaned input against the earlier baseline rather than the rough draft. Tariq Nunez agreed that the rough draft had caused the confusion and should not be used as the reference point. The group also talked about a separate naming issue in another project, but that was only background noise. By the close of the meeting, the corrected rerun had the stronger support.


Review Memo - 2026-06-03

This memo captures the intake notes for Project Asterion Nimbus and the follow-up plan for the rerun. The team first considered a dense pass, but that option was set aside after the review panel asked for stronger filtering. Mina Shah was noted as the coordinator for the Asterion Harbor workstream, and she kept the correction list with the rerun notes. A side discussion mentioned a different project using a calibration path, but that was only background context and did not guide this effort. By the end of the meeting, the group agreed to keep the revised retrieval stack under the Asterion Harbor name for the next run.


Email Thread - 2026-06-13

The status email says Halcyon Cobalt received signoff on the updated summary. It adds that the rerun, not the discarded comparison set, is now the reference for the team. The email also mentions two GPUs reserved for the last check and one spare unit held back. A reply in the thread says the earlier scorer stayed in the archive because it was only useful for contrast. The last message confirms that the review can proceed with the cleaner path as the current baseline.


Change Request - 2026-06-09

The change request proposes keeping the evidence-pooling approach and rejecting the older voting draft. It explains that the earlier draft was useful for discussion but not for the final pass. A side comment points to Project Ypsilon as another team with a different review cadence. The request says the final pass should inherit the same reviewer notes from the current cycle. The author adds that the archived draft can stay on record without affecting the outcome. The request closes by asking for approval before the next review meeting.


Review Memo - 2026-05-23

This memo is the final check for Mariner Harbor and summarizes the result that stayed on record. It says the corrected retrieval path remained the standard because the rerun handled the indexing failure cleanly. The memo also confirms that the invalid first pass should be ignored when readers compare the project versions. A short sidebar mentions a different team nicknamed Larkspur, but that effort was unrelated to the Harbor closeout. The final line asks the team to archive the retry notes with the review package.


Experiment Log - 2026-06-19

This update records the rerun that settled the Zircon Beacon review. The older route underperformed and was set aside after the rerun finished. The corrected route produced the evidence package that the team used for the closing note. A separate trial for Project Aurora Beacon was still pending, so its numbers were not part of this decision. The run log also mentions that the cleaned path was preferred because it avoided the earlier mismatch. No further correction was needed once the replacement route held up.


Review Memo - 2026-06-19

The review memo compares the Echelon Falcon rerun against the earlier failure. The invalid run is described as the one with the loading break, while the later pass is called the accepted baseline. Beacon appears again as the local alias for the accepted workstream. The memo warns that a side experiment produced noisy output and should not be used as evidence. Only the accepted baseline was considered strong enough for the next report. The reviewer signed off on the baseline and left the noisy branch out.


Email Thread - 2026-06-19

The Aurora Horizon email thread started with a note that the first route had been too noisy for the handoff. Leah Park suggested a cleaner route for the rerun and asked the team to keep the old attempt in the archive. The reply from Omar Finch agreed that the cleaner route should guide the next review. A side message mentioned a separate pilot for a different effort, but it was not part of Horizon. The thread closed with a reminder to summarize the accepted route before the status meeting.


Incident Report - 2026-06-03

The incident log records that Galena's first overnight run aborted after the ranking layer lost its cache state. A follow-up check showed the failure was isolated to the rerun environment, not to the shared corpus or the prompt set. The operators kept the partial outputs for comparison, because the later review needed a clean record of what had broken. One unrelated test for Project Citadel completed normally on the same host and did not affect the Galena incident. The report closed by recommending a fresh run with the cache reset and the same evaluation bundle.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-24

These minutes cover the Nightjar Nimbus handoff and the staffing follow-up. The first draft put Mara Vale on the review list, but that note was corrected before circulation. The corrected version kept the local alias Nightjar in the thread so the team would not confuse it with other projects. A side discussion mentioned a short-lived checklist that missed the final sign-off step. The group agreed to keep the revision notes attached to the same workstream. No schedule change was recorded in these minutes.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-24

This weekly report records the status after Project Citadel’s review closed. It says the ember path is now the standing direction and the beacon path has been retired from the active notes. A short update adds that the team is preparing the next checkpoint under the same direction. The report mentions no new setbacks, only a clean handoff from review to execution. A final aside notes that the old confusion is no longer part of the working plan.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-22

The notice reserves a modest compute block for Project Aurora Kernel so the final review can finish on time. Nova Vale is listed as the person keeping the check-in trail tidy for the team. The note says an earlier draft was too noisy and should not be used as the review baseline. A backup slot remains available if the final pass needs one more comparison. The notice closes by pointing readers to the weekly report for the approved version.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-11

The meeting minutes for Project Zircon Falcon began with a short status check on the evidence queue. Mara Vale was named as the person keeping the retrieval notes organized for the Falcon effort. The team said that a different line of work had already taken the lead on a separate annotation task. For Zircon Falcon, the group wanted the notes kept close to the rerun so the next review would not lose context. A brief aside mentioned that another project was still waiting on a capacity check.


Weekly Report - 2026-05-02

This weekly report summarizes what remained open after the Citadel review. The team kept the accepted rerun path, but the final storage reservation was still undecided. The report repeated that the Meridian-style shortcut was not the chosen route. A note about a different project was included for comparison, but it did not change Citadel's status. The unresolved storage item was left for a later update.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-05-14

The team met to review the Aegis rerun after the first pass stalled on a validation issue. They kept the alias Aegis local to this workstream and used it to separate the retry from a nearby pilot called Briar. The earlier path was shelved because the check set kept drifting, so the group agreed to tighten the prompt bundle before another attempt. One reviewer noted that the rerun should not be confused with the old Anchor test, which was only mentioned as background. A short follow-up list was assigned to track whether the revised setup held through the next evaluation window. The minutes closed by saying the retry would be judged against the same internal benchmark used in the previous discussion.


Weekly Report - 2026-05-23

The final status report said Fenwick Junction finished the cycle with the corrected pass in place and the failed start retired. It listed no open issues for the main path, though a different project still had a noisy validation problem. The report also noted that the appendix preserved the old failure for reference. Readers were told to use the cleaned result when preparing the handoff packet. The closing sentence confirmed that the final status was stable.


Weekly Report - 2026-05-24

The weekly report confirmed that the tighter review path had become the active standard for Wildfire Cobalt. It also said the earlier broad checklist was kept only as a comparison point for future audits. Talia wrote that the follow-up list stayed organized after the revision, which made the final review easier to close. The report warned that the unrelated fallback should not be reused because it had not matched the project's needs. The closeout section described the project as stable enough for the next handoff.


Weekly Report - 2026-05-18

The weekly report for Project Ypsilon Echo summarized the rerun after the method revision. The revised pass improved the review score and became the standard for later checks. The report also said the discarded shortcut stayed below the team’s acceptance line. A comparison table noted that the rerun was the one referenced in the final summary, while the earlier attempt was kept only as context. By the end of the week, the group treated the evidence-pooling path as the accepted route for Ypsilon Echo.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-20

The follow-up meeting for Project Verdant Horizon revisited the rerun and the earlier failed pass. Mara Lane kept the action list organized after the handoff, while the rest of the team compared the accepted run with the older miss. The group noted that the rerun was the basis for the final review, not the failed trial from the prior week. One attendee briefly raised a different retrieval package, but it was treated as background because it never became the reviewed standard. The minutes closed by asking Mara to circulate the summary once the evidence check was complete.


Review Memo - 2026-06-04

This memo compares the Asterion rerun with the earlier calibration attempt and explains why the team stopped citing the first result. The rerun recovered the missing evidence links and no longer showed the unstable swing that had spoiled the earlier pass. Rami Ortiz wrote that the revised path was the standard for the final review, while the earlier attempt remained useful only as a cautionary example. A note about Saffron was included as an outside reference, but it did not affect the Asterion comparison. The memo ends by saying the rerun should anchor all later summaries for this workstream.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-20

The weekly report confirms the leaner plan went live and avoided queue overload. Nia Hart's coordination list stayed active through the week and captured the final assignments. The report contrasts the accepted setup with the earlier broad burst, which was left unused. Bellwether Grove ended the week with the revised staffing intact and no rollback needed. A brief note about another group's spare capacity was mentioned only as background and did not affect Bellwether Grove.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-07

The Quartzite Horizon resource notice set aside extra compute for a recovery window after the failed run. It said the team would keep the rerun small and avoid the heavier path that had caused trouble earlier. The notice also mentioned a separate effort, Project Parallax Horizon, only as a contrast to the current recovery plan. One line reminded readers that the rerun needed a fresh cache before it could be trusted. The note was written after the incident review and before the final comparison memo. No staffing change was announced, because the same reviewer would stay on the follow-up.


Resource Notice - 2026-07-06

The notice says Caldera secured a short evening window after another team released the bench early. That slot was described as enough for a rerun, but not for a full day of testing. A small note mentions Project Nivalis as a separate scheduling case with a different backup room. The notice asks the team to keep the equipment list minimal and to avoid any extra swap work. Because the window was tight, the team planned to prioritize the validation pass over exploratory checks.


Experiment Log - 2026-06-21

This log reviews the Quartzite Iris rerun and separates it from the earlier failed attempt. The first trial used a threshold-style search, but the team said that approach was no longer the comparison point. The corrected pass switched to reward reranking and was treated as the only valid result for the review. A small indexing delay showed up during setup, though it did not change which pass counted. The team noted that the rerun should be judged against the cleaned evidence set rather than the discarded trial.


Experiment Log - 2026-07-08

This experiment log records the Orchard rerun and the short review that followed. The first pass for Onyx Orchard broke near the finish line, so the team set it aside. After that, Jalen Reef ran the corrected path and kept the later result as the active one. A nearby note about Project Quartzite Orchard was included only as background and did not affect the Onyx decision. The corrected path was the one the team carried into the next review.


Incident Report - 2026-06-05

This incident report covers the failed Asterion rerun and the reason it was stopped. The rerun on the Cedar lane ended with an out-of-memory error before the scoring step could finish. Because of that failure, the team rejected the earlier baseline and asked for a smaller setup. Jonah Reed noted that the Asterion Harbor alias should stay local to this project and not be reused elsewhere. The report also mentions that the invalid pass could not be used to justify the final review.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-19

The weekly report states that Project Fenwick Archive used three support staff and two shared review windows during the closing review. The report says the selected route stayed within the available support plan. A fallback route from a prior trial was still listed, but it was not counted toward the final support total. The note also mentions a separate Ibis effort that had its own staffing pattern. By the end of the week, the archive support line was described as sufficient for the chosen route. The report does not resolve the open follow-up ownership question from the meeting.


Review Memo - 2026-05-23

This memo closes the Laurel Harbor review and explains why the revised setup stayed in place. The memo says the earlier calibration idea was replaced by the corrected voting path because the retry handled the indexing issue more cleanly. It also states that the Harbor team kept the final comparison focused on the rerun rather than the invalid first pass. A brief aside mentions Project Thistle as another group with a similar review style, but it was not used for this decision. The closing note asks readers to treat the revised approach as the standing standard for the next cycle.


Change Request - 2026-06-12

The change request records the formal switch in the Nightjar Circuit after the comparison was settled. The old branch was retired because it kept producing noisy evidence, while the repaired rerun was accepted for the next stage. The request says the team should preserve the corrected trail and stop treating the failed branch as a live option. It also notes that the remaining work is administrative rather than experimental. By approval time, the circuit was described as aligned around the repaired path.


Incident Report - 2026-07-04

This incident report covers the failed rerun for Project Ypsilon Foundry and the corrective steps that followed. The rerun was launched after the kickoff notes, but it stopped when the index bundle could not be loaded. Eli Navarro confirmed that the fallback path was tested and then set aside because it produced unstable outputs. The team switched to a narrower retrieval lane, and that option cleared the blocking issue on the second attempt. Aster Vale recorded that the clean pass used fewer resources than the abandoned fallback path. The report closes by saying the failure was not caused by the calibration data itself.


Review Memo - 2026-07-01

The memo for Project Ypsilon Cobalt says the accepted rerun should stay in the record as the final reference. It also notes that the team reserved a single spare GPU for a possible spot check, but no further rerun was planned. Kira Frost was listed to keep the follow-up list tidy after the review closed. A passing mention of another project's deadline shift was included only as background noise. The memo ends by saying the earlier failed pass should be treated as superseded.