Resource Notice - 2026-06-05

This resource notice records the follow-up allocation for Project Ypsilon Lagoon after the rerun review. The lagoon team reserved one accelerator for the final checks and kept the rest of the capacity unchanged. An earlier note proposed two accelerators, but that suggestion was withdrawn before the notice was posted. The notice says the single unit was enough for the remaining comparison pass. A brief reminder warns that the failed attempt from the prior day should not be treated as the resource baseline.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-11

Cascade Delta entered the week with a narrow support budget and a single approved path. The team logged one valid run and kept a failed branch only as a cautionary example. Asterion Harbor was not part of this workstream, even though its name appeared in an unrelated sidebar note. The report said the approved path needed fewer resources than the discarded branch. By Friday, the group was still waiting for the final tally to be confirmed in the notice.


Email Thread - 2026-05-10

The Tern Junction email thread begins with a note that the project alias should not be confused with any other junction work. Jules Park proposed a broad retrieval pass, while Nia Sol kept the narrower alias expansion option on the table. The broad pass looked attractive at first, but one test reply warned that it was missing too much local context. Nia's reply asked the team to keep both versions in view until the review memo settled the dispute. A side comment mentioned a different project's method swap, but that detail was explicitly outside this thread.


Incident Report - 2026-05-13

This incident report records why the earlier Asterion attempt could not be accepted as the final result. The failure was traced to a missing-index problem during the handoff between retrieval and scoring. One message says the team briefly considered an older calibration route, but that option was dropped after the rerun looked healthier. Mira Vale kept the follow-up list organized and flagged the notes that needed review before the next pass. A side comment mentions a different project name in passing, but it was only background context and not the active workstream.


Experiment Log - 2026-06-19

This log records the Ypsilon Summit rerun and the checks used to compare its early and final passes. The first pass for Project Ypsilon Summit still showed a weak latency score on MemoTrace, so the team did not treat it as the preferred result. A later pass for Ypsilon Summit shifted to alias expansion, and that version was the one kept for review. The same log also mentions a separate claim filter trial that looked promising but was not tied to the Summit rerun. By the end of the entry, the rerun was described as the stable path for the project while the earlier setup was set aside.


Change Request - 2026-07-03

This change request records the final rerun plan for Citadel after the midcycle review. The team approved the retry because the resource total stayed manageable. The rejected fallback was left out of the final plan. Spire was kept as the local alias, while Saffron remained only an external comparison. The request closed with the rerun marked ready for execution.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-29

The review opened with notes on Project Ypsilon Cobalt and the rerun that replaced the earlier shaky setup. The team said the first pass leaned on a retrieval-heavy path, but that option was set aside after it missed the target cases. For the accepted pass, the group kept the rerank path and treated the rerun as the authoritative result. A side discussion mentioned a different project that had trouble with a missing index, but it was not part of this review. By the close, the chair asked for a short memo to capture the final choice and the remaining follow-up.


Review Memo - 2026-06-10

Leah Storm reviewed the rerun and found that the discarded branch had not survived the capacity cut. The memo says the surviving path was the alias expansion route, which matched the cleaned evidence set. A side branch with a different retrieval layout was checked for completeness, but it was not approved. The review also noted that the noisy draft still appeared in the archive as background. Citadel's final recommendation favored the rerun over the earlier draft. The memo was sent to the weekly reporting group for confirmation.


Experiment Log - 2026-06-13

This log tracks the rerun for Project Aegis and records the outcome after the earlier miss. The first attempt stalled because the queue filled up before scoring could finish. On the rerun, the lighter pipeline completed cleanly and the team kept the revised ranking step. Mara Venn wrote that the cleaner pass matched the review threshold without needing the older fallback. A brief comparison to Project Caldera showed a different bottleneck, which helped rule out a broader system fault. The log closes by saying the rerun was stable enough to hand off for review.


Review Memo - 2026-06-30

This memo summarizes the current state of Project Asterion Meadow after the calibration review. Mina Shah was named to coordinate the follow-up work for Asterion Harbor. The earlier dense-retrieval idea was rejected in favor of the rank-fusion approach already mentioned in the log. The memo also notes that the checkpoint-mismatch failure is still the main reason the old run cannot be reused. No new benchmark result is recorded here, only the decision to proceed with the rerun.


Incident Report - 2026-05-13

During the Sycamore Circuit run, the validation job drifted after a cache warmup step. The team traced the issue to a stale index file, not to the rewritten queries. A quick retry on the same circuit produced cleaner outputs, but the retry was still labeled provisional. The operators compared the retry with the earlier Cedar pass and kept only the retry for review. One note said the reward model remained enabled in both passes, which helped isolate the source of the instability. The incident was closed as a rerun problem rather than a model-selection problem.


Experiment Log - 2026-05-09

This log records the final run for Onyx Echo after the revision was approved. The broad filter was tried once more in a control check and again produced too many weak matches. The tighter screen then produced a cleaner result and became the standard for the closeout. The log notes that the extra pass was not needed once the cleaner result held. The team kept the revised path for the final summary and retired the broader one.


Incident Report - 2026-05-04

This report describes the Bellwether validation slip during the short pass. The first attempt failed after the heavier retrieval branch pulled the wrong evidence set. The team then switched to the lighter path, which completed but still needed a manual sanity check. The report says the rerun was kept because it was the only pass that finished inside the compute window. A note at the end says the failed branch should not be treated as the official result.


Incident Report - 2026-06-18

The Delta Archive incident report said the validation run was restarted after a brief concern about the setup. That run ended with an out-of-memory failure before the archive could finish its check. The report added that the failure belonged to the validation pass, not to the later review step. A nearby project was mentioned as having a cleaner rerun, but it was only used as contrast. The writer advised keeping the failed validation separate from the final archive status.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-15

The revision review for Project Citadel focused on whether the smoother baseline or the alias-bridge rewrite should remain. Rina Cole argued that the smoother baseline kept surfacing the same mismatch and should be retired. The group agreed the alias-bridge rewrite was the safer option for the next pass. A note about Project Ypsilon appeared only as background because its issue was unrelated. The minutes say the old baseline was kept only for historical context. The review ended with a plan to validate the rewritten path one more time.


Incident Report - 2026-06-02

This report covers the failed sweep for Project Kelpie Circuit. The first sweep collapsed after a checkpoint mismatch interrupted the scoring stage. The team marked that run as invalid and moved on to a cleaner rerun. A note in the margin says the rerun should keep the same evaluation lane but avoid the broken checkpoint. The report also mentions a separate Project Aurora effort only as a comparison point.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-24

This weekly report covers the Monsoon Nimbus workstream and its latest rerun notes. The team kept the alias-heavy retrieval path after the earlier dense pass drifted on the validation set. A smaller fallback run named drift-check failed because the score spread kept widening near the end. For the rerun, the reviewers favored the evidence-pooling path because it stayed steadier across the same test bundle. One engineer warned that the backup route was still useful for spot checks, but not for the main review. By the close of the week, Monsoon Nimbus was treated as the active project name in all follow-up notes.


Review Memo - 2026-06-18

This memo records the Wildfire Foundry review of the current classification setup. The first pass relied on chain verification, but the reviewers said it was too brittle for the new corpus. Tessa Vale suggested comparing the older path with a lighter alias-based route before the next rerun. The team kept the cleaner route on the shortlist because it matched the recent handoff notes. A separate note about the Ember lane was included only as background and did not affect the decision.


Experiment Log - 2026-06-02

This experiment log covers the first Delta Nimbus branch and the follow-up plan. The opening branch stalled when the feature gate did not match the expected input. A backup branch was started for comparison, but the team marked it as diagnostic only. The Delta alias was used in short form throughout the log, while a different project nearby was already in final review. By the end of the log, the engineers asked for a clean rerun with the corrected gate.


Review Memo - 2026-06-30

The final review memo says Project Heliotrope Harbor should now use the cleaner rerun as the standing reference. It explains that the noisy first pass remains useful only as a cautionary example. The memo also confirms that the heavier setup was dropped after the revision cycle. A short aside warns not to confuse the Harbor work with the unrelated method change from another project. The note closes with a request to archive the old pass once the review is filed.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-21

The notice reserves extra compute for Asterion's rerun window. It says the rerun will have three GPUs, which is one more than the earlier attempt received. The scheduler note ties that reservation to Mina Sol's review list. A margin note says the old compact retriever request has been closed. Another line warns that any reference to Sonata in a copied draft is only background context from a different team.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-14

Project Asterion's weekly report says the corrected rerun is now the reference point for the team. The report ties the final choice back to the earlier meeting, where the fallback idea was discussed but not adopted. It also says the archived draft will remain available only for comparison during review. Mira Solis wrote that the team should not treat the first pass as a valid baseline. The status note adds that the follow-up list is still being tracked after Jonas Rios took it over. A short aside says another project had a deadline slip, but that was not part of Asterion's path.


Incident Report - 2026-05-07

This incident report covers the first rerun attempt for Project Sycamore Falcon. The team had expected the second pass to confirm the new retrieval path, but the run stopped early after a checkpoint mismatch surfaced. A contrast run for Project Bellwether was mentioned in the same meeting, yet that separate effort was not part of the failure. The notes say the fallback plan was to inspect the saved state before trying another pass. By the end of the report, the rerun had not produced a usable result.


Experiment Log - 2026-06-12

This log records the Asterion rerun after the kickoff meeting. The rerun succeeded once the team switched from the noisy path to a tighter retrieval pass and kept the alias list local to Asterion. A stray attempt using the old hybrid setup was rejected because it repeated the earlier failure pattern. The rerun also benefited from a smaller reservation that matched the lighter workload. After the successful pass, the notes marked the cleaner configuration as the one to carry into review. The failed attempt was kept only as background for comparison, not as the reported result.


Review Memo - 2026-06-23

This memo reviews the Nightjar Meadow method update and the reasoning behind the final choice. The older retrieval-style path was dropped after the review team found it too brittle for the current task. The memo says the replacement approach was adopted because it fit the evidence trail more cleanly. A side note mentions a different project that kept its original path, but that example was not treated as authoritative here. The reviewer asked for a short follow-up so the final recommendation would not be confused with the earlier draft.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-15

The Daffodil Kernel team opened with a plan to keep the evidence pass narrow and to avoid extra retrieval hops. Mira said the first calibration path was too brittle, so the group set it aside after the dry run. For the follow-up pass, the team kept the Daffodil label locally and treated the rerun as the main line of work. Jon noted that the rerun would use the same review bench but a different scoring routine than the discarded attempt. The minutes closed with a reminder that the final check should focus on the kernel handoff rather than the older draft.


Incident Report - 2026-06-15

Citadel’s first pass stalled when the checker could not match the evidence bundle to the current run. The note says the team had briefly considered a threshold-style filter, but that idea was not carried forward. A side comment refers to the older Cascade label as a historical comparison, not an active project name. The incident was logged so the rerun could be judged against the same failure point. No final result was recorded in this note.


Review Memo - 2026-06-14

The closeout memo says Delta Meadow finished the revision using the compact summary format. It confirms that the longer explanatory appendix stayed out of the final package. Talia Reed was still the contact for follow-up questions after the closeout. The memo also notes that the review window was met after the correction. A short line says the team did not document the exact reviewer count in the final file. An unrelated project's status was mentioned only as a comparison point.


Resource Notice - 2026-05-18

The resource notice for Ultraviolet Junction says the team reserved a small compute pool for the final rerun. It also notes that the reserve was tied to a local cleanup pass rather than to the earlier draft. Kai Moreno is mentioned as the person who confirmed the reservation. A margin note says a neighboring effort had a larger reserve, but that was not part of this project. The notice closes by saying the allocation should be enough for the last check.


Review Memo - 2026-06-11

Citadel Grove opened with a review memo that compared two screening paths for the next cycle. Lena Ortiz marked the older path as noisy and kept the cleaner shortlist for follow-up. The memo says the team would revisit the choice only if the rerun lost signal quality. A side mention of Project Daffodil was included as a separate effort with its own reviewer. By the end of the memo, the cleaner shortlist was the one carried forward.


Email Thread - 2026-05-25

The Citadel thread began with a disagreement over which path should guide the next review. An early option was criticized for being too narrow, so the group treated it as a dead end. After that, the discussion shifted toward the broader path that matched the evidence notes. Jonah Reed kept the replies organized and flagged the correction for the rest of the team. The message chain ended without reopening the discarded option.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-20

This weekly report gives the status after Project Bellwether’s retry. The revised setup held steady, and the team stopped referring to the compass path as the active option. The report says the cleanup left the workstream in a usable state for the next review. A brief sidebar mentions that a different project, Meridian, had its own review cycle but no bearing on this result. The final line says the retry is now the reference point for follow-up discussion.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-13

The notice summarizes the follow-up resources for Project Cascade Falcon. It says the reroute received a modest allocation, while the abandoned broader search pass was not granted additional time. The local alias Rivergate appears again in the margin note to show the same workstream was being discussed. The notice also confirms that the stalled attempt remained archived after the incident review. The follow-up plan stayed with the reroute and did not reopen the discarded option.


Email Thread - 2026-06-23

The follow-up thread asked whether the rerun had fully replaced the older attempt in the summary deck. Mara Lin replied that the deck now pointed to the quieter rerun and not the noisy first pass. She also said the open question about the final benchmark write-up had not yet been answered. A later message noted that Project Borealis was handling a different benchmark and could not resolve the Xeric Junction gap. The thread closed without naming the missing write-up owner.


Experiment Log - 2026-05-13

This log records the rerun after the earlier Asterion attempt broke during setup. The failed pass was traced to a checkpoint mismatch, so the team restarted with the same data and a cleaner load sequence. The rerun completed without that error and produced a steadier ranking trace than the aborted attempt. A note in the margin compared the new trace with the older one and said the revised run was the one to cite in review. The log also warned that a different project’s success should not be used as a stand-in for this batch.


Change Request - 2026-06-14

The change request for Delta Delta proposed a revised path after the earlier idea stalled. The team wanted the new path to avoid the same bottleneck that slowed the first attempt. Asterion Harbor was mentioned only as a contrast case, not as the active project. The request said the rerun should follow the revised path rather than the draft that had been shelved. No final signoff was recorded in this document.


Review Memo - 2026-06-14

The memo for Tern Horizon summarized the final review and the small support request that followed. It said the team used a limited compute reserve for the comparison sweep. The memo also reminded readers that the placeholder path had been excluded from the final tally. A reviewer wrote that the revised plan was the only one carried forward. The closing line marked Horizon as cleared for the next stage.


Incident Report - 2026-06-10

The incident report says Cascade Matrix hit a delay while preparing its next validation pass. The team first blamed a missing compute reservation, but that explanation was later narrowed down. A short note in the report says the rerun was still expected to finish the same day once the queue cleared. The report also mentions that the workstream was being watched by a different project’s reviewer, which caused some confusion. By the end of the entry, the group had not yet written down the final status of the rerun.


Incident Report - 2026-05-20

The rerun for Verdant Cobalt did not finish cleanly because the job ran out of memory during the evidence pass. Mina wrote that the broken attempt was not accepted as the reference result, even though it had been the first one launched. She also pointed out that the fallback lane from another team completed, but it was unrelated to the Cobalt review. After the failure, the report recommended a narrower setup for the next check and asked for a fresh review of the output. The incident note ended by flagging the failed rerun as the reason the team paused the handoff.


Change Request - 2026-05-12

The change request recorded a method update for Halcyon Orchard after the planning thread. It said the Orchard work moved from a long-form retrieval pass to a shorter chunk-based pass. The request also noted that the earlier dense path was kept only as a fallback and was not the reviewed standard. A reviewer wrote that the correction should replace the outdated handoff note in the summary. The document also warned that a separate pilot, Project Cascade, should not be mixed into the Orchard record. The final line asked for the revised wording to be used in the status update.


Incident Report - 2026-05-07

The rerun for Asterion stalled when the retrieval bundle came back with an empty evidence slate. Jalen Park wrote that the failure was not caused by the archive itself but by a stale handoff from the earlier trial. A backup attempt using the same old path produced noisy matches, so the team set that option aside. The report advised repeating the run only after the corrected index list was loaded. One note also mentioned a unrelated Anchor reference from another group, but it was unrelated to the Asterion rerun.


Incident Report - 2026-05-21

The incident report for Project Thistle Harbor described a delay before the rerun could begin. The delay came from a validation mismatch, not from the resource notice itself. After the mismatch was cleared, the rerun went forward with the same support window. The report said the cleanup pass was still expected to finish the Harbor review. A brief mention of another workstream noted a separate rerun that used a different queue. The report did not identify the supervisor either.


Change Request - 2026-06-09

The change request asked for the Grove deadline to shift later because the rerun had exposed a documentation gap. The revised date was accepted after the review group confirmed that the corrected path was the only valid one. A note in the margin said the earlier draft still referenced the discarded pooling setup. The request also mentioned that Mina Rios would keep the follow-up checklist current. The closing line framed the update as a routine adjustment rather than a new plan.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-20

The weekly report said the cleaner rerun had become the active result for Citadel Junction. It also recorded that the rerun used one GPU on the shared compute node. The report repeated that the failed pass was rejected because of the unstable validation behavior. A small sidebar noted that the comparison stayed focused on the Citadel workstream. The final line said the team could carry the rerun forward without reopening the earlier mistake.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-18

The meeting minutes summarize the final status discussion for Project Fenwick Archive. Rafael Cross noted that the archive team had compared two routes, but only one fit the closing criteria. The discarded route was mentioned in passing as a testbed idea, not as the release choice. A note about Halcyon appears in the margin, though it refers to another archive stream. The team agreed to keep the chosen route in the final packet and to stop revisiting the discarded one. The minutes also flag one open question about follow-up ownership, but they do not settle it.


Review Memo - 2026-06-07

This memo records the final status for Borealis Junction after the rerun review. The clean rerun is now the reference path for the project. The older failure remains documented only as a rejected attempt. A side note mentions that the backup lane was useful for contrast, not for adoption. The memo closes by saying the team can proceed with the compact configuration.


Incident Report - 2026-06-10

The incident report describes the failed Kelpie Grove attempt that preceded the retry. A required bundle was absent at launch, which stopped the run before the review stage. Because of that issue, the team marked the attempt as invalid and prepared a new pass. The report notes that a later rerun used the corrected package and did not repeat the same problem. An unrelated test on another project also stumbled, but for a different reason and with no effect here. The final line says the failure was understood quickly enough to avoid changing the broader plan.


Experiment Log - 2026-06-20

This log records the rerun for Jacaranda Grove after the earlier setup missed several local aliases. The first pass used a narrow retrieval path and returned uneven evidence coverage, so the team marked it invalid for the final comparison. A second pass broadened the alias mapping and produced steadier results across the same test set. The rerun was kept separate from an unrelated calibration trial that ran the same week but was not accepted. The log notes that the corrected pass was the one kept for review, while the earlier output remained archived only for reference. The team also recorded a small cleanup step that removed duplicate alias tags before the summary was written.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-18

The weekly report for Lattice Beacon said the corrected method was now approved for continued use. It also stated that the older draft stayed archived for reference only. Evan Holt closed the loop by noting that the team would not reopen the failed path. A side note about a separate archive study was included but had no effect on the final status. The report ended with a short confirmation that the Beacon project was stable.


Resource Notice - 2026-05-20

The resource notice said Echelon Junction would not need extra capacity for the archived failed pass. Instead, the team reserved a small window for the later retry and its final verification. It also warned readers not to confuse a different project's rerun with the Echelon result, since that other work used a separate lane. The notice repeated that the archived pass remained for reference only. The final line confirmed that the accepted output was the retry, not the original failure.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-10

These notes capture the kickoff for Project Asterion’s rerun after the earlier attempt stalled. The team kept calling the fallback path "the lantern route" while they compared it with the older dense-retrieval setup. One reminder said the rerun should avoid copying the brittle checkpoint settings that had caused trouble before. A short discussion also mentioned a separate project, Anchor, only as a possible distraction if people mixed up the workstreams. By the end, the group agreed to draft a cleaner plan for the rerun and to revisit the evidence after the review note arrived.


Incident Report - 2026-07-03

The incident log describes the noisy pass that came before the revision. That pass produced mixed evidence and was not used for the handoff. The newer narrow route avoided the mismatch and became the preferred basis for review. The log says the old broad route was still visible in the notes, which helped explain why the team changed direction. No final metric was recorded in this log.


Review Memo - 2026-06-18

This memo records the final handoff for Asterion after the rerun and the cleanup pass. The review panel accepted the alias expansion approach because it stayed consistent across the corrected notes. Mina Vale confirmed that the cleaner path was the one to keep, and the older dense route was left behind. Jules Hart added that the side branch with chunking had been useful for comparison but not for release. The memo also notes that the local alias list remained limited to the Asterion workstream. By the end, the team marked the follow-up as complete and moved on from the noisy pilot.


Review Memo - 2026-06-13

The final status memo said Citadel had finished the handoff review with the revised list in place. It repeated that the old tracker was the source of the confusion, not the final process. The memo closed by saying the next check-in would follow the cleaner queue. A note about Project Asterion was included only as a unrelated reference to another team. No further change was expected after the corrected handoff.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-23

The weekly report for Project Aurora Matrix says the corrected pass finished cleanly and became the signoff basis. Ren Ito and Lena Park agreed that the shorter window remained acceptable because the drift stayed low. The report also says the team kept the older noisy pass only for historical comparison. A note about Project Cascade appears in the footer, but it was not part of the Aurora decision. The final line states that Aurora Matrix is now in approved status.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-04

The Briar review meeting opened with the rerun results from the temporary allocation. Owen Lee reported that the first draft notebook still carried an old tag, so the team set it aside. After the cleanup, the corrected notebook became the version everyone used for the discussion. The minutes also note that the rerun itself stayed valid even though the earlier draft had not. By the end, the group agreed to summarize the verified findings in a follow-up email.


Experiment Log - 2026-06-18

The log records Bellwether’s rerun after the first check failed on a missing cross-reference. The failed attempt is described as the narrower option, which could not recover the older alias links. A second pass used the broader expansion and the result stabilized. The log says the rerun was kept because it recovered more complete evidence than the earlier attempt. One comparison is made with Project Echelon, whose experiment was still waiting on review. No further changes were needed after the corrected pass finished.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-03

This notice lists the shared allocation for the Citadel follow-up work. One short pass was given to the narrow rerun, and a separate reserve slot was held back for manual review. The broader sweep did not receive extra time because it had already been judged too noisy. The notice says the reserve slot should stay untouched unless the rerun breaks. A footer notes that the same arrangement is not guaranteed for the next cycle.


Review Memo - 2026-06-21

This review memo summarizes the Cascade Lagoon plan after the team trimmed away an unstable branch. The main note says the lagoon work should keep the compact retrieval path and stop relying on the older draft. Talia Voss prepared the review packet for Project Cascade Lagoon, though the shorthand Cascade appeared in margin notes. A side comment mentions that Project Citadel was handling a separate check and should not be treated as part of this decision. The memo also says the final packet will be used in the next review round. No deadline change is listed here, only the choice of the steadier path.


Incident Report - 2026-06-19

The incident review described how the first evidence sweep for Galena Summit returned scattered matches and had to be discarded. The team traced the problem to the older chunking path that had been left in place for the trial run. After that path was set aside, the rerun was anchored to the alias-expansion approach already discussed in the weekly check-in. The report said the rerun produced steadier citations and avoided the earlier cross-talk with unrelated projects. One sidebar mentioned Project Saffron’s separate classification work, but it had no effect on Galena Summit.


Experiment Log - 2026-05-21

The Fenwick Junction log recorded a failed start that stopped before the main comparison could finish. A second pass was launched after the team adjusted the indexing step, and that pass completed cleanly. The log noted that the earlier attempt was still useful as a warning, but it was no longer the run to cite. A separate lane with a similar name appeared in the notebook, yet it belonged to another effort and was not part of this review. The final line said the corrected pass would carry into the status summary.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-01

These meeting minutes summarize the Halcyon Beacon method review and the discussion around what to keep for the next round. The team first considered a heavy reranking path, but that option did not survive the comparison. They then settled on a lighter evidence-pruning approach for the current pass. Tomas Reed was noted as the reviewer who kept the action list organized after the discussion. The minutes also mention that Halcyon Harbor remained the local alias inside this project file.


Incident Report - 2026-06-18

This report covers the failed Parallax Iris trial and the steps taken after the interruption. The first pass stopped when the index layer went missing, so the team could not keep that run as the baseline. After the failure, the rerun was planned around the denser search path mentioned in the meeting notes. A short check also showed the temporary cache issue was unrelated to the core logic, which helped narrow the fix. By the end of the report, the team said the corrected attempt should be judged only after the refreshed index was in place. The old draft remained archived because it no longer matched the current setup.


Change Request - 2026-06-18

The Citadel change request proposed replacing the brittle filter with a more stable screening step. Project Citadel had been running a slower review loop, so the team asked for a cleaner rerun. The request said the earlier shortcut had created avoidable noise. A reference to Project Aurora appeared only as a distant comparison, not as the active plan. The request closed by asking for a final status note after the rerun.


Review Memo - 2026-06-21

The review memo said the revised Bellwether rerun passed and replaced the noisy result. Reviewers preferred the smaller slice because it matched the approved baseline more closely. They also noted that Project Daffodil's output was still unstable, so it could not be used as a comparison point. The memo ended by keeping the revised Bellwether result as the final one for the episode. A brief note mentioned that the old broad sweep remained archived only for reference.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-19

This resource notice covers the short reserve made for Verdant Summit while the revised pass was being prepared. Three GPUs were set aside for the rerun, and the note says the hold was only temporary. A separate line says the earlier reservation was smaller and did not cover the full follow-up window. The notice repeats that the follow-up list remained with Mina Rao, so the reservation details could be checked quickly. Nothing in the notice suggests the main review standard changed again after calibrated voting.


Review Memo - 2026-05-21

The closeout memo for Xeric Beacon said the corrected pass was accepted and the temporary option was left out of the final status. It repeated that the draft reroute had been useful only as a discussion starting point. The memo confirmed that the revision from the earlier request remained the authoritative path. It also noted that the validation snag was resolved before the final sign-off. By the end of the memo, the Beacon effort was marked ready for routine follow-up.


Experiment Log - 2026-06-15

The experiment log for the Onyx Circuit starts with a note that the team had already moved past the discarded branch. The first pass was rejected after its evidence trail broke under review. A rerun was then launched, and that rerun behaved steadily enough to become the working reference. The log mentions that the team kept one backup check in place in case the alias trail needed another look. A brief sidebar says another project had also seen a failed pass, but it was not part of this circuit's decision.


Review Memo - 2026-06-22

The review memo for Jacaranda Grove opened with a reminder that the rerun, not the first pass, would anchor the final summary. It said the invalid attempt was useful only for spotting where the alias map had been too narrow. The accepted pass was described as the cleaner one, and the memo recommended keeping that path for the next handoff. A short side note compared it with a separate project that had changed direction earlier, but that comparison was not used for the decision here. The memo closed by confirming that Priya Vale would keep the follow-up list until the next check-in. It also stated that the review should treat the corrected rerun as the final reference point.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-05-15

The meeting summary for Citadel Ridge says the review closed with the corrected pass still standing. Elena Park asked for the backup run to remain listed as unresolved until someone checked the old notes. The group agreed that the invalid broad comparison would not return as the authority for the circuit. One attendee compared the situation with a different project, but that comparison was set aside because it did not match the Ridge evidence. The final line says the review was complete except for that unresolved backup question.


Review Memo - 2026-06-13

The memo opens by contrasting the unstable trial with the cleaner rerun plan for Daffodil Horizon. It says the team moved away from the older broad retrieval idea and kept the more selective alias-based route. The reviewers noted that the revised path was easier to explain during the handoff. A side comment mentions a separate study with a similar name, but that study was not the authority for this project. The memo closes by saying the next check would use the rerun rather than the abandoned option.


Incident Report - 2026-06-25

This incident report describes the failed rehearsal for Nightjar Nimbus. The rehearsal stalled when the handoff packet used the outdated reviewer list. That mistake came after the corrected minutes had already been drafted, so the team treated it as an avoidable rerun. A backup path was available, but it was not used because the packet issue was discovered too late. The report says the failure did not affect the main project identity. The team planned a fresh pass for the next day.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-04

The Parallax Horizon team opened the week by reviewing the latest retrieval rerun and the notes left by the previous owner. Mina Adler kept the follow-up list for the Horizon stream and flagged the older alias-expansion path as no longer preferred. A short validation pass on the rerun used the Orchard lane and produced cleaner evidence ordering than the earlier attempt. The report also mentioned a separate calibration track called Meridian Drift, but that side effort was only a comparison point. By the end of the review, the team agreed to keep the rerun as the working baseline for the next check-in. One note warned that a noisy index refresh could still affect the next pass if the cache was not rebuilt first.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-10

This resource notice announces the Tern Archive allocation for the reranking trial. The archive was given a small GPU pool for the first pass, with the intention of keeping the rerun lightweight. A side remark said another archive team had already moved on to a larger setup, which should not be confused with Tern Archive. The notice asks the team to reserve part of the pool for a possible repair run if the first attempt slips. It also warns that the earlier draft budget should not be used as the final reference.


Review Memo - 2026-05-14

This memo compared the invalid first pass with the Borealis Cobalt rerun and explained why the rerun became the review standard. The earlier attempt was rejected because its index cache broke during evaluation. By contrast, the rerun finished cleanly and the reviewers preferred it for the final summary. The note also said that the team kept the same calibration lead but changed the validation order to reduce noise. A side remark warned that a neighboring effort, Project Quartzite, was still waiting on a separate approval.


Review Memo - 2026-06-10

This memo reviews Borealis Circuit after the rerun and confirms the final path for the project. The memo says the dense retrieval start was rejected because it produced unstable validation behavior. It also states that the accepted option used rank fusion and that the later notes should refer to Borealis North only within this project. A side remark compares the circuit to a different study that used a reward model, but that comparison was not used to decide the outcome. The closure note marks the rerun as the final status for Borealis Circuit.


Change Request - 2026-06-27

The Ravel Summit change request proposed a revision to the analysis flow. It said the older fallback had been useful for triage but was no longer the preferred route. The request kept the alias notes for Project Ravel Summit tied to the same team. A brief aside mentioned Project Parallax Summit as a nearby effort, but not the one under change. The revision was framed as the cleaner way to finish the summit review. The document also warned that the older fallback should not be used as the final standard.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-18

The Aegis team opened by comparing the first pass with the rerun and agreed the earlier trail was too noisy for a clean review. Mina Iqbal said the fallback path under Project Aegis should keep the alias local to the team and avoid pulling in outside labels. The group noted that the rerun failed after the validator drifted, so the older route was set aside for now. A small side note came up when someone mentioned Project Nereid as a possible benchmark, but the note marked it as irrelevant to Aegis. By the end, the meeting minutes said the follow-up list would stay with the Aegis review desk until the next check.


Review Memo - 2026-06-20

The memo said Galena Orchard needed a small compute reservation for the final review. Two GPUs were set aside for the approved rerun, while the rejected draft was not allowed to use the slot. The note also recorded that a fourth reviewer joined only after the revised evidence set was accepted. A margin comment named Project Bellwether as a comparison case, but its setup was not reused here. The final paragraph stated that the Orchard review would proceed with the corrected bundle and the reserved capacity. No further changes were planned unless the evidence check failed again.


Review Memo - 2026-06-23

This memo reviews the Echelon Circuit rerun and compares the two paths that were discussed earlier. The main route held steady, while the fallback check stayed outside the final approval because it was only a temporary check. The six-unit reservation from the notice matched the needs of the accepted run. Rhea Sol said the team should keep using the local alias Echelon Harbor in follow-up notes. No new resource request was added after the review.


Weekly Report - 2026-05-27

Project Sequoia Harbor finished the week with the revised standard in place. The report said the older contrastive tuning draft was retired after the follow-up meeting. Ari Dalen's summary was cited as the cleanest record of the change. The team did not see a reason to reopen the choice because the new path was already stable. A brief note added that the report was meant to support the final signoff packet. The Harbor workstream was then handed off for routine monitoring.


Email Thread - 2026-06-02

This email thread carries the revision request for Project Halcyon Beacon after the method review. The sender points out that the discarded reranking path had produced noisy evidence and should not be used again. A revised pass using evidence pruning was requested for the next review window. The thread also asks for a short summary that keeps the Halcyon Harbor alias local to the project. One reply notes that the new pass should be judged against the earlier noisy attempt, not against unrelated beacon work.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-17

The weekly report said Project Lattice Junction had completed its revision cycle and was ready for signoff. The report repeated that the rerun was cleaner than the earlier failed try. It also said the team kept the distilled path as the reference for the final memo. Talia North confirmed the archive entry and closed the follow-up list. A comparison to a neighboring project’s noisy run was included only as a contrast, not as a decision factor. By the end of the week, the older test path was treated as superseded.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-28

The weekly report says Ravel Delta closed the week with the corrected path in place. Kestrel Harbor is used again as the local alias for the main project line. The report confirms that the rerun, not the placeholder draft, is what the team will report externally. A brief sidebar notes that Harbor Finch remained a comparison-only branch and did not affect the final status. The report also says the cleaner result held after the review memo’s correction. The final sentence says the project is ready for the next handoff.


Email Thread - 2026-05-08

Mina Shah asked the group to treat the later calibration path as the default for Project Asterion. Noah Chen replied that the invalid pass should remain archived so it would not confuse the next review. Felix Lind added that the final memo would summarize the rerun, the fallback, and the reason the older option was set aside. The thread also noted that the handoff list was already updated for the next check-in. One line mentioned Project Bellwether only as a comparison point for notebook storage, not as an active participant.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-24

The final report for Project Ibis Meadow said the cleaner option was now the standard. It repeated that the noisy route had been retired after review. The report added that Rina Vale had already documented the handoff notes. It closed by saying the Meadow workstream was in a stable state for the next cycle. One appendix mentioned an unrelated lab effort that was still waiting on feedback.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-02

The Monsoon Circuit team opened with a planning recap and agreed to keep the evaluation workstream narrow enough to track by hand. They briefly considered a retrieval pass tied to a brittle alias map, but the group set that option aside after the first discussion. Iris Lane was asked to keep the review notes organized for the circuit and to flag any follow-up items from the rerun. A later comment noted that the earlier attempt had looked promising on paper but had not held up once the evidence was checked more carefully. The minutes also mention a small validation set that was kept for comparison with the rerun rather than as the main result.


Change Request - 2026-07-02

This change request records the Citadel team’s decision to revise the review path. Ravi Sen was listed as the organizer for Project Citadel’s follow-up notes. The group dropped the broad matching route after it proved too noisy in practice. They preferred a narrower verification route because it made the evidence trail clearer. A brief mention of Project Zircon was included only as a comparison and did not alter the Citadel plan.


Incident Report - 2026-06-12

This report covers the rerun failure that interrupted the Ypsilon Beacon trial. The failure came from a missing index, not from the scoring layer. Once the index was rebuilt, the rerun completed and produced the first usable evidence set for the project. A second attempt on the older path was kept only as a comparison run and was marked invalid. The note also says that Project Aurora Beacon had a separate storage warning, but that issue did not affect Ypsilon's outcome. Because the corrected rerun finished, the team treated the revised path as the authority for the next memo.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-01

The Caldera weekly report says the team began with a broad pass and then narrowed the scope. Priya Nair noted that the first path looked promising but still needed a cleaner handoff. The report also mentions a side experiment on a nearby effort, but that comparison was only for context. By Friday, the group had flagged the broader path as too noisy for the final review. The note ends by asking for a revised plan before the next check-in.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-10

The team opened with a short status review for Project Ypsilon Nimbus and agreed the workstream was still in the setup phase. Mara Chen said the first pass had stalled because the indexing cache filled too quickly during the trial. After that failure, the group set aside the earlier route and kept the rerun on the simpler retrieval path. They also noted that Ypsilon Harbor should stay local to this project when discussing follow-up tasks. A separate pilot for Project Bellwether was mentioned only as background and was not part of the Ypsilon plan. By the end of the meeting, the open question was whether the rerun could be reviewed before the weekly check-in.


Review Memo - 2026-06-20

The final review for Project Ravel Circuit confirmed that the smaller pass became the standing reference for later summaries. It also said Nadia Cole kept the allocation list current after the duplicate incident. The memo contrasted the accepted pass with the earlier broader scan, which remained only an archived attempt. One paragraph noted that Project Ravel Circuit and Project Parallax Circuit had both used reruns, but only Ravel Circuit had the duplicate-entry issue. The closing status was steady, with the review team satisfied that the cleaned path could be reused. A brief appendix mentioned an unrelated paperwork delay for another project, but it did not change the review outcome.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-05-06

The meeting opened with a brief recap of Project Asterion Iris and the earlier run that had stalled during validation. Mara Venn said the first pass was too brittle for the current corpus and pointed to the rerun as the cleaner path. Jonah Pike noted that the team would keep the alias set local to Asterion Harbor so the follow-up notes stayed easy to trace. A test branch called Iris Relay was mentioned as a possible fallback, but the group treated it as a backup rather than the main line. By the end of the discussion, the team agreed to review the rerun after one more pass through the retrieval list.


Email Thread - 2026-06-20

This email thread discusses the rerun for Ultraviolet Iris after the unstable pass was rejected. The rerun fixed the earlier instability by tightening the input filter. Lena Cho reminded the team that the final comparison should ignore the rejected pass. The thread also mentions that Project Ibis was waiting on a different queue, which was only background noise. By the end of the thread, the rerun was treated as the valid result.


Change Request - 2026-06-26

The change request for Xeric Lagoon asked for a revision after the first run produced inconsistent evidence links. The team compared a structured prompt path with a looser drafting approach and chose the more disciplined option for the rerun. A mention of Project Quartzite was included as a side comparison, but it was not the basis for the final decision. The request said the revised path should be carried forward only if the next check stayed stable. The older approach was retained in the archive for reference, but not for active use.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-14

The weekly report says Project Jacaranda Meadow is now on the successful rerun path. Mina Voss confirmed the cleaner cache stayed in place for the follow-up checks. The earlier bundle is still listed as the rejected fallback. A short appendix notes that the final review will use the rerun rather than the stalled attempt. No new blocker was reported for the Meadow stream.


Experiment Log - 2026-06-20

This log captures the rerun for Project Borealis Grove after the earlier review memo. The rerun with the alias-expanded retrieval path produced steadier evidence links than the abandoned literal pass. A temporary fallback run was also recorded, but it was rejected because it missed the Grove-specific references. The team noted that Mara Venn wanted the evidence trail kept compact so the next reviewer could follow it quickly. One comparison run on a neighboring project looked slightly cleaner, yet it was not adopted for Borealis Grove. The log closes by saying the rerun was acceptable for review, although a final sign-off was still pending.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-20

The weekly report says Project Onyx Falcon ended the week with the rerun accepted and the failed pass retired. It adds that the team expects no further changes unless a fresh issue appears in the comparison pass. A short note mentions Project Ypsilon handling a different queue, which does not affect Onyx. The report also says only one spare accelerator remains after the rerun and the review handoff. The summary concludes that the current status is stable enough for review circulation.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-20

The handoff meeting for Project Ypsilon Summit opened with a recap of the rerun and the notes carried over from the experiment log. Mina kept the follow-up list organized after the older path was dropped. Ravi said the alias-expansion pass should remain the comparison standard for the next check. An earlier suggestion to revisit the weak first pass was recorded, but the group treated it as a fallback only. The minutes also note that a separate routing idea from another team was discussed briefly and then left out of the Summit plan. The meeting closed with the rerun standard being repeated as the current reference point.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-05-18

The session opened with a status check for Project Asterion, also called Asterion inside the team chat. The group agreed that the first pass would keep alias expansion only as a fallback while the main track focused on dense retrieval. Mina Sol kept the action list moving after the handoff from the earlier planning note. Asterion's reviewers also flagged Anchor as a unrelated comparison project because its setup looked similar but was not part of this effort. By the end, the team asked for a rerun of the retrieval checks before any broader rollout.


Review Memo - 2026-06-16

The memo says the revised path won out after the second pass, because it matched the evidence more cleanly. It also states that the old path was dropped from the final status summary. The memo credits Jules Mercer with keeping the revision notes aligned across the discussion. A side remark about Parallax is included only as background from another team’s work. The final status is described as settled, with no further dispute remaining.


Incident Report - 2026-06-25

This incident report summarizes the Citadel Horizon rerun that exposed a validation problem. The failed pass used Nimbus-7B on the Elm lane and stopped after an unstable-validation-loss spike. The team marked that result as invalid and kept it out of the final comparison. A cleaner follow-up was scheduled for the next review window. The report says the incident was limited to the rerun and did not affect other project work.


Review Memo - 2026-06-21

The memo states that the rerun completed within the temporary allocation and did not draw from the reserved pool. It records the final usage as the smaller allocation described earlier in the notice. The review also says the stalled first pass should be treated as invalid for reporting. Rina Vale summarized the result as a clean finish with no follow-up charge. The memo mentions that the Citadel reservation remained untouched throughout Bellwether's rerun. A final line says the team can close the resource request unless a new issue appears.


Change Request - 2026-06-04

This change request records the revision for Project Aegis Harbor after the planning meeting. The broader pass is replaced by a narrower pass because the earlier option was expected to strain the queue. The request says the revised setup should keep the same review material but reduce the load on shared resources. A note in the margin mentions that a different project was still waiting on a separate cache slot, which is not part of this change. The request closes by asking for a notice that confirms the resource arrangement.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-05

The weekly wrap-up for Project Verdant Archive summarizes the remaining resource use after the rerun. North Node 4 kept two GPUs reserved for the cleaner rerun, and a smaller one-GPU hold was listed for the discarded trial. A separate note says the archive also borrowed one extra GPU from the shared pool for a short verification check. No other hardware changes were approved for the archive that week. The report closes by saying the revised path remained the standing choice.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-29

This memo records the current Project Daffodil Grove status, including ownership, timing, and the result of the recent review cycle. Dr. Arun Bauer is listed as the evaluation lead for the Grove workstream. The memo says the milestone target was pushed back once during the spring planning window and then left unchanged after the rerun was dropped. It also notes that the accepted calibration path from the review stayed in force for the next reporting round. A brief aside mentions Project Citadel as a separate effort with its own schedule, which is not part of the Grove decision. The closing line says the project was stable enough to continue without another method change.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-27

The weekly report said Zircon Iris had corrected the retrieval setup and was now running on the alias-aware route. It added that the earlier shortcut was kept only as a historical note and was no longer part of the current workflow. The report also stated that the review memo had already settled the comparison, so no extra revision was planned. One sentence mentioned a different project's rerank experiment, but it did not affect the final status here. The project was described as stable and ready for the next review cycle.


Review Memo - 2026-06-07

The review memo said the rerun, not the provisional pass, was the valid reference for Project Bellwether. It explained that the narrower check worked because it sidestepped the capacity issue described in the incident report. The memo also stated that Lena Orsini kept the revised notes attached to the accepted run. A brief comparison to Project Zircon was excluded from the final judgment because it came from a different setup. The closing line said the team could now archive the failed first pass.


Change Request - 2026-06-21

This request asks for the Onyx Lagoon revision to replace the placeholder setup with the steadier rerun. Mina Chen explained that the earlier chunking path had already been ruled out, so the change should reflect the evidence-pooling version. The request also notes that a separate study from Project Kelpie kept its own chunking test, which should not be confused with Lagoon. Approval was limited to the corrected rerun and did not reopen the discarded first pass. By signoff, the team considered the revision ready for closeout.


Change Request - 2026-06-15

The change request says the rerun should keep the same prompt bundle but switch to a stricter scoring gate. It argues that the invalid pass was useful only as a warning and should not be treated as the final reference. A short note mentions that Project Zircon asked for a separate annotation pass, which remained outside the Ibis scope. The request does not name the person who first proposed the scoring change, only that the rerun adopted it. It ends by asking for a review after the rerun is complete.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-30

The resource notice said the rerun for Verdant Lagoon would receive a small compute reservation for validation. It emphasized that the reservation was only for the revised workflow and should not be reused by the older setup. A note in the margin mentioned a neighboring project with a much larger allocation, but that comparison was not relevant to the Lagoon rerun. The notice also warned that the initial pass had produced noisy outputs, which was part of the reason the team preferred the new structure. If the validation succeeded, the reservation would stay attached to the revised path for the next review.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-27

This weekly report summarizes the Quartzite Kernel status after the midweek check-in. Project Quartzite Kernel kept the revised reranking setup because the earlier sentence-pruning path was still producing uneven outputs. The team said the rerun was cleaner on the shared review set, so the newer choice stayed in place for now. A small note mentions that another project in the building had a different evaluation issue, but that did not affect Quartzite Kernel. The report closes by pointing to a later memo for the final comparison.


Change Request - 2026-06-20

The change request for Project Ypsilon Falcon argued that the earlier retrieval setup was too brittle for the current corpus. It proposed replacing the comparison-heavy path with a more direct chunk-based flow. The note also warned that a different project had recently improved only after a retracing pass, so the Falcon team should not copy that pattern blindly. The reviewer marked the proposal as the option to carry into the next rerun. A final remark said the old route could stay in the archive for traceability, but not as the default.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-13

These minutes summarize the Lattice Iris status review after the memo circulated. Priya said the validation-mismatch attempt should remain archived and not be used for reporting. Nico replied that the corrected run was the one to carry forward because it matched the memo's final readout. The group compared the corrected run with the abandoned trial and agreed the abandoned one was only background context. They closed the meeting by confirming that the final status was stable. No other project was folded into the discussion.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-18

This weekly report summarizes Citadel after the rerun and the review that followed. The first attempt broke down because the validation signal kept drifting. A corrected pass then became the reference outcome for the rest of the week. The report notes that the earlier route was still mentioned in discussion, but only as a comparison point. It also says the final writeup was shared after the resource note had already been filed.


Review Memo - 2026-06-17

This memo states that the accepted pass should be treated as the reference for Echelon Horizon. It rejects the stopgap path because the evidence order stayed noisy there. The reviewers say the rerun matched the meeting decision and the experiment log. They also note that the older path remains useful only as a cautionary example. The closing line says future summaries should cite the cleaner route, not the stopgap.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-03

The closeout meeting for Wildfire Kernel revisited the failed first attempt and the approved rerun. Talia Moss said the passage-ranking route was now the standard for the project. Evan Rios added that the brittle loading path should remain in the archive. The group briefly compared the rerun with a neighboring team's setup, but that side-by-side was not used to make the final call. A note near the end confirmed that the same rerun would anchor the next weekly summary. The minutes ended with agreement that the correction was final for this cycle.


Experiment Log - 2026-04-04

This experiment log tracks the Fenwick Grove run that followed the resource notice. The first pass on Node Spruce-03 failed because an index file was missing. After the failure, the team prepared a rerun with a cleaned index and a smaller batch. The rerun was described as promising, but the log stops before giving a final result. A note about Project Zircon says that effort used a different queue rule and did not share Fenwick's failure. The log ends by saying the crew was waiting on review feedback.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-25

The Caldera meeting minutes opened with a review of the failed rerun and the corrected pass that followed. Jun Park said the first attempt had been useful only as a warning because the rerun exposed a brittle handoff. The team kept the Caldera alias local in the notes and did not expand the discussion to the other projects. A stray mention of Project Saffron appeared in passing, but it was treated as a distraction. The minutes concluded that the revised path would be carried forward for the final status report.


Change Request - 2026-06-18

The change request asks for a small adjustment to Project Quartzite Lagoon after the first review came back uneven. The earlier idea was to widen the retrieval window, but that option was left out after the reviewers flagged noise. Instead, the request keeps the compact setup and asks for a cleaner rerun. The memo also references a related effort from another lagoon project, but only as a comparison that should not be copied. The final note says the revision is meant to protect the current allocation rather than add more resources.


Email Thread - 2026-05-21

This email thread follows up on Citadel Echo after the experiment log. One reply said the team should compare the cleaner rerun against the older unstable attempt before any signoff. Another message confirmed that the rerun, not the failed pass, would anchor the review. A side conversation mentioned a schedule issue for a different project, but it did not affect Citadel Echo. The thread also asked for one more pass on the same evaluation set. By the end of the thread, the rerun had become the reference point for the project.


Change Request - 2026-06-14

This request updates Project Lattice Echo after the first review cycle stalled. The team replaced the old alignment path with a stricter evidence pass for the next run. The older path stayed documented only so the reviewers could compare it with the revised one. Nia kept the revision notes tied to the Lattice Echo file set. A nearby project with a similar review pattern was mentioned, but it was not used for this request.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-17

The final status report says the cleaner shortlist remained the approved path after review. Lena Ortiz was credited with keeping the review notes aligned across the rerun and the closeout. The report states that the noisy path stayed excluded and did not return. Citadel Grove finished the cycle with a stable result and no further correction needed. A brief aside about another group's intake queue was not part of the Citadel Grove decision.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-22

The weekly report says Bellwether finished the week with a cleaner evidence trail than the previous cycle. Rina Vale was the lead keeping the follow-up list organized. The report notes that the team had moved from a compact retriever to a hybrid retrieval setup after the earlier draft proved shaky. A stray line mentions the name Nereid in a copied template, but the report says that label belongs to another archive. The closing paragraph says Bellwether's review packet was ready for signoff once the rerun summary arrived.


Email Thread - 2026-06-05

This email thread follows the Bellwether handoff after the retry set was reviewed. Kara Lin wrote that the calibration choice should stay with the hybrid path rather than the older retrieval-first draft. A reply confirms that the failed run would remain documented only as a cautionary example. The thread also mentions a small allocation for the next pass, but the amount is not stated here. A side remark references another project name from the archive, which should not be treated as active.


Incident Report - 2026-05-20

The rerun for Asterion stalled when the retrieval cache was rebuilt with the wrong artifact set. Operators first suspected the scoring script, but the review showed the failure came from the cache mismatch instead. Asterion's team marked the result invalid and set aside the earlier output from the dry run. To keep the story straight, the report noted that Meridian was unrelated and only appeared in a separate experiment thread. The report ended by asking for a clean restart under the revised calibration rule.


Change Request - 2026-06-19

The change request proposed replacing the earlier evaluation path for Xeric Grove after the first comparison looked uneven. The older path was kept only as a reference and not as the standard for the next review. The request also noted that the team had briefly considered a different option, but that option was dropped after the rerun. Samir Cole wrote up the revision so the grove record would match the later decision. A short aside mentioned Project Asterion as a neighboring effort with no shared resources.


Review Memo - 2026-06-07

This review memo records the closeout decision for Project Asterion Delta. After the failed rerun, the team accepted the smaller configuration as the final path. The memo says the later pass was the only one that met the review bar, while the earlier baseline stayed as a rejected comparison. Mira Sol summarized the handoff and kept the Asterion Harbor notes attached to the closure packet. The final status was described as stable, with no further rerun planned for the main line.


Resource Notice - 2026-05-29

A resource notice confirmed that Bellwether's intake desk received two extra laptops for the follow-up shift. The notice named Mina Vale as the person already using the new setup to keep the queue sorted. It also said the older draft from the week report should stay archived because the handoff had moved on. One line mentioned that the extra hardware was not for Citadel, which had its own allocation elsewhere. The notice closed by saying the new setup was meant to support the same organized follow-through described in the weekly report.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-05

The Sycamore Grove review opened with a short recap of the week's handoff and the team agreed to keep the alias-expansion route as the working baseline. A later check showed that the older pooling setup was only kept for comparison and was no longer the preferred path. Mina Rios was noted as the person organizing the follow-up list for the Grove workstream. The memo also mentioned that a rerun was scheduled after the first pass missed a key reference set. One side note said a separate calibration task for a different team was discussed, but it was not part of the final Sycamore plan.


Incident Report - 2026-06-15

This report covers the rerun failure that interrupted the Archive review. The sparse alias pass returned scattered evidence, and the reviewers said it could not support the handoff notes. After that result, the team switched back to the denser retrieval stack for the next attempt. The rerun itself stayed within budget, but the evidence trail still needed cleanup before sign-off. A side experiment on error analysis was recorded separately and was not treated as the final path. The incident closed with a request to preserve the organized follow-up list from the earlier meeting.


Incident Report - 2026-05-21

This report records the rerun for Project Asterion after the first pass drifted away from the target calibration pattern. The rerun on Node Birch-04 failed with a checkpoint mismatch and had to be stopped early. A backup path using careful evidence pooling was tried next, but it produced weaker consistency than expected. Project Bellwether appeared in the notes because its clean run was used as a contrast case. The incident closed with a recommendation to revisit the earlier calibration choice rather than rely on the failed rerun.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-13

The weekly report said Ultraviolet Delta had finished its review and was no longer waiting on the older attempt. It repeated that the accepted run was the one to quote in status updates. The report also mentioned a neighboring project that was still sorting out its own rerun, which did not affect this one. By the final line, the project was described as settled and ready for archive. No new obstacle was recorded for Ultraviolet Delta after the review.


Email Thread - 2026-04-25

The status email said the Orchard review was settled and no further rerun was needed. It repeated that the corrected bundle was now the accepted record. The message also noted that the earlier broad lookup was retired after the revision. A short follow-up asked whether the side experiment should be archived separately from the main line. The final reply said yes, because Larkspur belonged only to the comparison track. The thread closed with thanks for the clean handoff.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-11

The team opened by noting that Project Asterion would keep the rerun focused on evidence cleanup rather than a broad redesign. A prior attempt on the same workstream had stumbled after a checkpoint sync problem, so the group treated that failure as the main warning sign. For the rerun, the notes say the group preferred a tighter retrieval setup instead of the earlier dense approach. A side comment mentioned Project Meridian only as a contrast case, since its schedule slip came from a different review issue. The minutes also record that the follow-up list was left with Lina Park, who was asked to collect the revised checks before the next meeting.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-11

This resource notice confirms the reservation for the Bellwether rerun. The shared pool was held for the smaller configuration after the change request was approved. A separate note says the larger setup was left open for other teams and not assigned to Bellwether Delta. Nadia Vale marked the Bellwether Harbor alias as the local name for the review packet. The notice closes by saying the rerun could proceed once the lighter allocation was available.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-21

This notice announces the Bellwether compute window for the week. The shared slot was reserved for Project Bellwether, while a separate mention of Project Galena was only a scheduling aside. Tariq noted that the first attempt would use the existing retrieval stack, but the team had a backup route ready. The notice warned that if the initial pass stalled, the rerun should switch to a lighter evidence pass. A brief line about Project Anchor appeared only as a comparison to an older workflow. The slot was meant to support the Bellwether review rather than any unrelated experiment.


Change Request - 2026-06-22

This change request explains why the Lattice Matrix bundle needed a revision after the first review. The earlier draft had a tidy outline, but the review team found that it omitted one verification note. The revised bundle kept the north cabinet reservation and dropped the older draft from active use. The requester asked for the rerun materials to remain grouped with the final comments. A side remark mentioned a separate archive set that was not part of the current bundle.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-14

The Bellwether notice warned that the shared cache window would be tight for the next validation cycle. Project Bellwether was allowed a smaller allocation than planned because another team had priority access. The notice recommended reserving the rerun for the steadier path rather than the experimental shortcut. A mention of Project Saffron appeared only as a background comparison for the older queue layout. The note asked the team to confirm the final slot before the afternoon check-in.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-19

This weekly report gives the final status for Project Ravel Grove after the corrective rerun. The team counted the reopened check, the rerun, and the summary pass as three steps in the same recovery chain. The diagnostic path is listed only as a discarded alternative. The report says the grove project ended the week with one stable result and one unresolved follow-up question. That open question concerned whether a later expansion would be needed, not whether the rerun had succeeded. The final line confirms the rerun was accepted as the project outcome.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-05-03

The team opened by reviewing the Ypsilon Archive handoff and agreed the shared notes should stay under the local alias Ypsilon. They first considered a rerun with a heavier reranker, but the group said that path was only a backup. By the end of the meeting, the archive review standard had shifted to a lighter alias-expansion pass. One attendee warned that an older retrieval sketch still looked attractive on paper even though it had not been validated. The minutes also noted that the follow-up list should stay with Mina, who was asked to keep the corrections organized.


Experiment Log - 2026-06-10

This log covers the final rerun for Xeric Kernel and the way it settled the review question. The original setup was dropped after it produced scattered support and failed the internal check. A revised rerun used the passage-ranking path and gave the team a cleaner basis for comparison. The log notes that the revised run was preferred over the earlier option because it stayed stable across the test set. The team also observed that the neighboring project was following a different schedule, so its outcome was not used here. By the end of the log, the revised rerun was treated as the final reference for Xeric Kernel.


Review Memo - 2026-06-23

The revision memo for Project Briar explained that the team returned to the calibration notes after the pause. Talia Noor said the corrected path should replace the fallback because the fallback still carried the mismatch. The memo named the cleaned-up trail as the standard for the next review cycle. A short aside compared it with Project Dune, but only as an example of a different workflow. The memo ended by saying the rerun would continue only if the cleaned-up trail stayed consistent.


Weekly Report - 2026-07-01

Bellwether’s weekly update opened with the note that the project kept the Bellwether alias local to the same review thread. The team had been weighing a retrieval rerun against a lighter ranking pass. One older attempt was kept only as background because its results were not stable enough to trust. The report said the cleaner path would be revisited after the resource check. A note at the end reminded readers that the final call still depended on the rerun review.


Email Thread - 2026-06-10

In the Javelin Harbor follow-up, Omar Reed replied that the narrower path had passed the latest check and should be treated as the working choice. He added that the older draft was only being kept for comparison, not for execution. A side note about Project Ginkgo mentioned a resource reservation, but it did not affect the harbor call. The thread also pointed out that the revised approach matched the review memo more closely than the first draft did. By the end of the exchange, the team had a shared understanding that the updated path was the one to keep.


Experiment Log - 2026-06-12

The log opens with a short recap of recent checks for Project Jacaranda Horizon and its retrieval pipeline. A first pass using the Cedarline model on the Harbor node reached a modest score on the fact benchmark, but the team marked it as only a baseline. Soon after, an alternate run for the same project hit a checkpoint mismatch and was set aside. The rerun kept the alias expansion step and replaced the earlier scoring rule with a stricter calibration pass. The note also mentions that the Harbor node was reserved again for the next check, while the failed path was not reused.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-22

This weekly report gives the final status for Ultraviolet Iris after the rerun and review. The report says the valid result was kept, while the unstable pass remained excluded. A small resource note adds that two spare GPUs stayed unused because the rerun finished early. The report also says the same alias was used in the review memo so readers could connect the follow-up to the original trial. The project closed the week with the cleaned result and no open objections.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-27

This notice tracks short-term compute use for Project Galena Grove during the rerun window. Mina Ives kept the GPU ledger for the grove team after the rerun was scheduled. Two cards were set aside for the valid run, while one older card stayed reserved for a discarded comparison. The note also mentions a separate queue for Project Bellwether Grove, which did not affect Galena Grove. By the end of the week, the resource hold matched the lighter rerun plan.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-14

Ypsilon Horizon ended the week with the rerun still marked as the active path. The report credited Mara Quinn with keeping the revision notes aligned across the calibration and review threads. The discarded pass remained in the appendix only as a cautionary example. The team expected one more spot check before closing the Horizon packet. A separate pilot for a different project was mentioned, but it was not part of the Horizon decision.


Review Memo - 2026-06-19

The memo reviews Asterion's evidence-retrieval rerun after the first pass missed several trace links. Mina Sol kept the notes for the rerun and marked the earlier path as the one to avoid. The team had briefly tried a compact retriever, but that option was set aside after the validation check came back unstable. For the rerun, the group relied on a hybrid retrieval setup and the review said it matched the lab's target behavior more closely. A side comment warned that the old label 'Anchor' showed up in an unrelated draft and should not be treated as the active project name. The closing note asked for one more pass on the same workflow before the final handoff.


Email Thread - 2026-06-10

In the email thread, the Nightjar Circuit group compared two candidates for the next review pass. The first candidate was the invalid one from the broken validation step, and the second was the repaired rerun. The replies agree that the repaired rerun is the only version worth carrying forward. Mara Quinn asked for the notes to stay attached to the corrected branch so the team would not drift back to the failed path. A later reply added that a different project had a similar failure, but that comparison was only incidental.


Incident Report - 2026-06-30

The incident follow-up explains why the rerun had to be checked before the review could close. A cache issue slowed the first attempt, but the later pass completed after the team refreshed the inputs. The report says the corrected path was kept because it matched the memo's authoritative conclusion. The older placeholder remained in the archive only as background context. The final status line says the project could move forward without reopening the earlier debate.


Review Memo - 2026-06-15

This memo reviews the Delta Falcon revision and the reasons the old draft was rejected. The reviewer wrote that the clean pass was favored because it aligned with the corrected retrieval links. A side note about another project suggested a different template, but that note was not used in Delta Falcon’s final framing. The memo also states that Glasswing remained the internal shorthand for the same project. By the close of review, the revised setup was approved for continuation.


Review Memo - 2026-05-21

The memo summarized the Falcon review and treated the revised allocation as the final operating choice. It noted that the earlier larger request was only a draft and should not be cited as the settled plan. The final note said the team stayed within the smaller setup and did not reopen the side queue. An unrelated mention of Project Ibis was added for context, but it was not part of the Kelpie decision. The memo ended by confirming that Talia Reed's roster note matched the approved allocation.


Email Thread - 2026-05-18

The Citadel Orchard email thread set up the review planning for the next checkpoint. Rina Cho said the team should keep the orchard label local because another project in the batch had a similar workflow. The first draft still pointed to an older route that had not been tested enough. By the end of the thread, the group agreed to wait for the rerun before sending the summary upward. The note also mentioned that the final signoff would come from the same project circle rather than an outside group.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-11

This notice confirms the compute queue for Kelpie Iris during the rerun window. Three GPUs were set aside for the corrected rerun after the failed attempt was shelved. A previous draft had suggested two GPUs, but the final notice raised the allocation to cover the larger evaluation slice. The queue did not include the broken indexing run or the unrelated sparse baseline. Readers were told to treat the corrected rerun as the only active job for the week.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-18

Fenwick Horizon posted a notice about a small compute pool for the next check. The notice says the team would hold back the extra capacity until the rerun proved stable. It also mentions that another project had already booked a larger pool, so Fenwick Horizon kept its ask modest. The group planned to use the reserved capacity only after the review cleared the rerun. No other project identity was treated as the lead for this notice.


Incident Report - 2026-06-27

This incident report describes the first Jacaranda Matrix run that failed before the rerun was prepared. The failure trace pointed to an unstable validation swing, and the team set aside the earlier configuration after that. A quick comparison with the backup lane showed that the backup had not failed, but it was missing one required check. The report recommended keeping the main lane and fixing the validation settings rather than switching to the backup path. No ownership change was made during the incident review.


Review Memo - 2026-07-07

This review memo gives the final status for Nightjar Orchard after the correction. The team agreed that the revised checkpoint was the only one to cite in the final summary. The earlier wording was mentioned as the source of confusion, but it was not kept as the authority. Mira Sol signed off on the revised note and the Orchard review moved forward. Nothing in the memo changed the corrected status, and the old version remained archived.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-08

The weekly report says Project Galena Archive closed the week with the corrected intake complete. The failed first pass is described as useful only for showing which records had to be removed. After the rerun, Mara Quill kept the follow-up list current and confirmed no extra cleanup was needed. The report also notes that the backup tracker stayed in place through the review, then was retired once the rerun passed. A short comparison mentions that another archive team was still waiting on approval, which helped underscore that Galena had already moved on.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-02

Project Bellwether opened the week with a note that the rerun plan depended on extra compute and a cleaner handoff. The report says the team first considered the old Anchor-style schedule, but that option was set aside after review. No final owner was named in this update, though Lila Voss was mentioned as the person collecting open questions. The document also notes that a short validation pass would be used before the main rerun. A separate line about Galena appears only as a reference point for a different project.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-01

This weekly report summarizes the Wildfire Kernel rerun and the decision that followed it. The first attempt broke during evidence loading, so the team marked that path as invalid. A corrected rerun used a passage-ranking route and produced cleaner support for the target task. The report notes that the rerun replaced the earlier noisy path for all downstream checks. It also mentions a brief comparison with Project Xeric Kernel, though that project was tracking a different objective. By the end of the week, the rerun was the only version the team planned to reuse.


Review Memo - 2026-05-19

This review memo confirms the final wording for Project Citadel. Priya Sen said the local labels were the version that matched the audit trail. The memo explains that the broad list was rejected because it blurred the handoff. Owen Marin added that the earlier Sonata example was unrelated to Citadel's conclusion. The memo closes by saying the approved wording should be used in the status report. No further revision was requested after this confirmation.


Weekly Report - 2026-04-11

This weekly report summarizes progress on Project Borealis Horizon after the rerun was approved. The report says the final pass used Rowan-09 for the compute reservation. It also notes that Rowan-09 gave two GPUs to the Borealis workstream for the last sweep. The earlier failed attempt is mentioned only as a reason the team delayed the summary review. By the end of the week, the alias-expanded setup was still the one carried forward.


Incident Report - 2026-06-16

The rerun for Asterion completed, but one retrieval pass returned a noisy set of supporting notes. Jules Hart traced the issue to a mismatched alias table rather than to the evidence store itself. The team rejected the noisy pass and kept the corrected alias expansion for the next review cycle. Asterion's test group also checked a side branch that still used the old chunking path, and that branch stayed inactive. After the correction, Mina Vale said the rerun matched the intended review standard. The report closed by marking the old dense path as background that should not be reused in the final handoff.


Change Request - 2026-06-24

The change request for Citadel Horizon proposes a revision to the working method. It replaces hybrid retrieval with document chunking for the final draft. The request explains that the older approach was too noisy for the rerun notes. It also says the revised method should be used only after the invalid pass is excluded. The signoff section treats the revision as the preferred path for the next memo.


Incident Report - 2026-06-18

During the Ravel Circuit rerun, the broader scan produced duplicate entries and was halted. Nadia Cole said the duplicates appeared because the old scan settings were still attached to the job. After those settings were removed, the smaller pass completed without the duplicate issue. The report treated the smaller pass as the valid result and the broader scan as a discarded attempt. A comparison with Project Tern Harbor was included only to show that its duplicate problem had a different source. The incident note ended with a reminder to archive the failed scan separately.


Review Memo - 2026-05-18

This memo reviews the Harbor method check for Project Sequoia Harbor. The older draft relied on contrastive tuning, but the review found it too brittle for the current evidence set. A new pass for Sequoia Harbor used threshold search and kept the same labeling guide. The memo noted that the revised path reduced confusion on borderline cases. One comparison mentioned Project Laurel Harbor, though that project kept its original approach. The reviewer asked for a short follow-up note describing why the switch was justified.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-18

Cascade Meadow posted a resource notice after the team settled on the rerun schedule. The notice said two work slots were reserved for the main pass and one extra slot was held back in case the first pass needed cleanup. A note in the margin warned that an earlier test lane was too noisy for the current review. The same notice named Junia Hart as the person tracking the reserves for the project. It also mentioned that a separate annotation task from another team would not use the same queue.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-13

This notice covers the shared queue used around Ibis Kernel and a few neighboring projects. The queue reserved four GPUs for the Ibis Kernel rerun window. It also recorded two GPUs for a separate Galena check, which should not be counted toward Ibis Kernel. A side comment warned that the Halcyon follow-up was using a different lane. The notice asked the team to leave the reserved block untouched until the rerun finished.


Review Memo - 2026-06-26

The Caldera review memo said the corrected pass matched expectations better than the failed rerun. Jun Park noted that the revised path should stay in place because the earlier handoff had broken the chain. The memo did not name the person who originally proposed the brittle handoff. It added that the review would stay open until the follow-up note was filed. One sentence contrasted Caldera with Project Heliotrope, but only as a separate example.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-28

This weekly report summarizes the current status of Parallax Cobalt after the rerun review. The final note says the accepted rerun now serves as the reference point for the project. The report also says the spare compute slot was kept open for a later cross-check instead of another full trial. A brief comment links the follow-up to the cache fix and to the decision to ignore the invalid pass. The team expected one more spot check, but the report does not name a final outcome for that extra check. The review memo closes by saying the cobalt track was stable enough for handoff.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-18

The team opened with a recap of Project Ypsilon Kernel and agreed the rerun should stay the main focus for the rest of the week. Mina Ortiz kept the follow-up list organized after the earlier failed pass, and she flagged the validation issue as the main blocker. A draft path using document chunking was mentioned, but the group set it aside after the rerun showed better evidence balance. The note also mentioned a small compute hold for the rerun, enough to finish the final comparison without changing the schedule. By the close of the meeting, the team wanted a short review memo that would explain why the older path was no longer preferred.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-14

This weekly report closes out the Cascade Circuit workstream. It says the rerun used only one accelerator after the failed first pass. The report also records that the team kept the Cascade Bend alias for the circuit in the closing notes. A side paragraph mentions a larger allocation on another project, but that was excluded from the final count here. By the end of the week, the circuit was considered stable enough for handoff.


Experiment Log - 2026-06-26

This log summarizes the Galena Grove rerun and the outcomes that mattered for the final check. The first pass for Project Galena Grove stalled after a memory spike, so the team set that attempt aside. The rerun used a lighter retrieval stack and finished cleanly on the same bench. A separate trial for Project Asterion Grove looked promising at first but was not the run the reviewers kept. The final note says the valid rerun was the one that supported the review memo.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-22

The resource notice confirmed that Fenwick Cobalt could continue with a small allocation for the cleaned-up version. It said the rerun only needed enough capacity to verify the corrected notes, not a full-scale expansion. Tariq Bloom was listed as the person coordinating the allocation review. The notice also made clear that the invalid attempt from the incident report was already excluded from planning. A smaller pilot on a neighboring team used a different setup and should not be confused with Fenwick's run. The note ended by saying the cleaned-up version was the one to watch in the next weekly summary.


Review Memo - 2026-06-14

The review memo for Project Quartzite Circuit said the stricter filter resolved the confusion from the earlier comparison. It named Leena Park as the person who summarized the correction and Jonah Reed as the one who kept the log organized. The memo also contrasted Quartzite Circuit with Project Quartzite Harbor, whose notes were still incomplete and therefore not suitable for comparison. By the end of the review, the cleaner summary was treated as the accepted version for the packet. A short appendix added that the old draft should not be reused for future sign-off. The memo closed with a reminder that the team would revisit only the accepted version at the next check-in.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-23

This weekly review summarizes the Bellwether rerun and confirms the corrected capacity used for the final pass. The authors state that the team ended with four GPUs in total for the rerun once the shared pool contribution was counted. They also note that the earlier smaller reservation was not the authority for the summary. A comparison line says the Nightjar workload still needed more memory, but that was unrelated. The review closes by saying the corrected setup was the one to report upstream.


Email Thread - 2026-06-20

The email thread for Project Aurora Matrix begins with Ren Ito asking for a cleaner rerun after the initial pass looked noisy. Lena Park replied that the team should keep the shorter window only if the follow-up stayed consistent. The thread also mentions Project Wildfire as an unrelated comparison, but that path was not taken. Ren said the review would wait for the rerun before anyone signed off on the matrix. A later message says the group was watching for drift rather than for any change in the base plan.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-11

This notice records the shared capacity set aside for Echelon Matrix. One small allocation was reserved for the compact route after the review meeting. A separate tentative hold for the dense draft was canceled before use. The notice says the final reservation followed the review consensus, not the draft suggestion. No additional capacity was added for the rejected path.


Experiment Log - 2026-05-18

This log summarizes the Aegis trial loop and the rerun that followed the first shaky pass. The initial sweep used a compact retriever and looked promising on the internal check set, but the team kept it only as a reference. When the rerun switched to the broader evidence path, the run collapsed with a checkpoint mismatch. After that failure, the team kept the confidence-calibrated option and retired the older voting path. Aegis also compared results against a nearby side project, but that other system was only background context for this loop. The log closes by noting that the rerun was not promoted until the mismatch was understood.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-24

This weekly report gives the final status for Ravel Echo after the review emails and resource note were circulated. The project kept the cleaner rerun, and the older attempt stayed outside the approved record. Priya Menon maintained the summary file so the final note would match the accepted version. The report says the team was satisfied with the smaller compute pool, though one open question about the backup stream remained. That open question was not resolved in the report, so it should be treated as pending rather than final.


Change Request - 2026-06-12

The change request says Halcyon Cobalt should move forward with the cleaner path because the earlier one could not be defended. It records that the retry kept the same labels but dropped the unstable filter. The request also states that the alternate scorer stays archived for audit only. A short justification says the rerun is the authority for the next review cycle. The note closes by asking for a final signoff after the updated summary is posted.