Resource Notice - 2026-06-22

This notice records the support allocation for Project Echelon Circuit after the rerun request came in. The lab reserved six accelerators for the main path, while the fallback check was left with only a minimal sandbox. Because the rerun needed steadier throughput, the notice says the six-unit reservation was the only one tied to the final pass. Rhea Sol asked for the local alias Echelon Harbor to stay in the notice so the support request could be traced easily. The temporary sandbox was not counted as part of the committed support.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-11

The notice confirms that the rerun lane received four GPUs for Bellwether’s next attempt. It explains that the allocation was meant for the cleaner path rather than the earlier noisy setup. The older path stayed available only as a fallback if the new attempt failed. A side note mentions Delta as an unrelated project in the same queue. The notice does not describe the result, only the planned use of the resources.


Review Memo - 2026-05-24

The memo reviewed Project Asterion after the rerun and compared the failed path with the fallback that followed. The final review standard was calibrated voting, not the earlier evidence pooling idea. Juno Park summarized the tradeoff and kept the correction notes attached for the next pass. Project Citadel was mentioned as a nearby program with a different validation routine. The memo ended by saying the team would keep the revised standard unless a later audit showed a stronger alternative.


Review Memo - 2026-05-15

The summary memo says Bellwether kept the broader fallback path after the trial run and set aside the narrower option. Ravi Soren confirmed that the audit trail was cleaner on the broader path. The memo also states that the team had used three shared compute slots during the trial period. A brief comparison with Citadel is included only as context for a different review style. By the end of the memo, the broader path was the standard going forward.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-22

The Kelpie Nimbus discussion compared the stable baseline with a more aggressive search path. Ravi Seng said the aggressive path looked promising at first, but the invalid run became noisy once the evidence set widened. The group decided to keep the stable baseline for the rerun and to postpone the flashy alternative. A brief sidebar noted that another project had already finished its own review, which was not relevant here. The minutes also mention that the Kelpie alias should remain attached to this workstream only.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-11

The weekly report for Halcyon Echo opened with a reminder that the team was watching a retrieval rerun after an earlier miss. The first attempt used a dense pass, but the notes said it underperformed and should not guide the final review. The revised run shifted to alias expansion and produced the better readout. A short aside mentioned Project Ibis working on a separate classification lane, which was not part of the Halcyon Echo review. The report closed by asking for the rerun notes to be compared with the discarded dense pass before signoff.


Experiment Log - 2026-05-20

This experiment log records the rerun for Project Fenwick Meadow after the earlier attempt was set aside. The rerun used the revised review direction and finished cleanly. Iris Quade wrote that the old route was no longer the comparison point. A smaller support bundle was enough for the run, and the reserve pool was left unused. The log also mentions a neighboring test that failed for unrelated reasons. The final line says the rerun became the current reference.


Incident Report - 2026-05-09

This incident note records the unstable first attempt for Monsoon Cobalt and the checks that followed. The early run stalled after the loss curve began to swing, which made the team label it an invalid comparison point. A later rerun on Cedar-02 recovered cleanly and produced the result the reviewers wanted to keep. One engineer briefly suspected a storage issue, but the logs pointed instead to a training instability rather than any hardware fault. The note closes by saying the rerun, not the earlier pass, should be cited in the final review.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-22

The group opened with a recap for Ypsilon Iris and noted that the earlier path had been set aside after mixed validation signs. One reviewer said the rerank should stay with the calibrated route, while another argued for a stricter verifier and flagged that option as a fallback only. They also mentioned a separate study in the same batch that relied on pruning, but it was treated as background rather than the main guide. By the end of the discussion, the team agreed the rerun would follow the calibrated route and keep the alias notes local to Ypsilon. A short action item asked for a fresh check on the evidence list before the final memo was circulated.


Experiment Log - 2026-05-15

The experiment log for Ultraviolet Nimbus recorded a clean start before the first evaluation. A baseline run completed, but the team marked it as provisional because the settings were still being tuned. The log also mentions a separate lane that was not used for the main analysis. After the first pass, the crew prepared a corrected rerun with the same review set. The note says the rerun would decide whether the project could move forward.


Change Request - 2026-06-10

This change request records the revision plan for Project Bellwether Nimbus. The first idea was to keep a broad calibration pass, but the reviewers asked for a narrower setup. Asterion Harbor was mentioned only as a nearby example of a rerun workflow, not as the main project. The revised plan kept the Bellwether Harbor label local to this project so the team could separate it from the older draft. The request also notes that the rerun should be judged against the calibration checklist rather than against the abandoned broad pass.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-13

The weekly report says Xeric Echo finished the review cycle with the rerun as the accepted result. It notes that the earlier unstable pass remains archived and should not be used for summaries. The report also mentions that one GPU slot was left unused after the rerun completed. Talia Reed is again credited with keeping the follow-up notes current. A brief comparison to another project appears in the footer, but it is unrelated to Xeric Echo's final status.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-05-19

The meeting minutes cover the Halcyon Matrix capacity review and the tradeoff between speed and coverage. The larger annotation pool was rejected because it would have crowded out the shared labeling queue. The team instead leaned toward the smaller backup plan for the rerun. A note about Project Verdant says its reviewers were already committed elsewhere, so it could not lend staff. The chair asked for a follow-up check on whether the smaller pool could still cover the key cases. No final signoff was recorded in the meeting itself.


Experiment Log - 2026-06-29

This log captures the Parallax Kernel trial notes for the lab day and records both the working path and a later rerun. The first pass used Lumen-8B on Cedar-02 for Project Parallax Kernel, but the score dipped after the validation curve became unstable. A later rerun shifted to a different retriever and kept the same evaluation set, mainly to check whether the wobble came from the earlier choice. The team also noted that the older path was only kept as a comparison point and should not be treated as the final setup. By the end of the session, the rerun looked steadier, though the writeup still asked for a review before any handoff.


Email Thread - 2026-05-21

The Citadel thread starts with a check on the review package and the draft summary. One message proposes a stricter verification path, while another argues for the lighter audit path. The lighter path was used first, but it was later treated as provisional. Project Xeric is named only as an outside comparison for a different rollout. The thread ends with a reminder that the final status should reflect the corrected choice, not the provisional one.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-19

This notice records the compute reservation for the Monsoon Summit rerun and the follow-up window. The rerun kept the same small allocation that was used for the later successful pass. A previous booking for a neighboring project was released before the Summit team started. The note also says the backup slot stayed unused because the main run finished cleanly. Nothing in the notice changes the final review choice, which still pointed to the rerun.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-25

The notice records that Quartzite Iris received additional compute for the accepted rerun. It also says the rejected trial was not given more resources because it was already ruled out. The team kept the final pass aligned with the same evidence set named in the weekly report. A short addendum says the storage buffer was sufficient once the rerun was narrowed to the valid setup. The final line confirms the resource request matched the corrected plan rather than the old one.


Weekly Report - 2026-07-04

Project Briar reported that the revised evidence pass held up better than the first attempt. The report says the rerun cleared the weak citation issue, although one unrelated sandbox test still failed on a different corpus. Lena Voss summarized the outcome and noted that Briar, not the unrelated Project Aster trial, was the workstream under review. The latest status was described as ready for final review after the corrected path was adopted. A closing line said the team would keep monitoring for regressions during the next cycle. The report also contrasted the new result with an earlier fallback approach that had been kept only for emergencies.


Incident Report - 2026-05-05

The incident report for Project Bellwether Circuit describes a failed validation step during the Harbor rerun. The failure came from a missing index in the broader fallback path, not from the narrower pass that the team trusted. Priya Sen noted that the workaround from a neighboring effort should stay out of the Bellwether review. The report says the clean rerun was repeated after the bad path was isolated. A final note explains that the incident was contained before it could affect the next check.


Email Thread - 2026-05-20

Noah Chen asked whether the corrected rerun should be cited as the final reference for Project Citadel. Felix Lind replied that it should, since the older branch had already been marked broken. Mina Shah confirmed the closeout plan and said the remaining item was a brief cleanup pass. The thread also noted that the review summary was ready for circulation. A brief aside mentioned Project Daffodil only as a neighboring calendar conflict.


Resource Notice - 2026-05-10

The Bellwether notice said the team could borrow one extra accelerator window for the rerun. Jules Hart flagged that the first request had been under-sized for the planned evaluation. A side reference to Nereid was included only as a contrast with another group's queue. The note also said the local alias Bellwether would stay in use for the rest of the week. The resource window was reserved for a second pass rather than for the discarded draft.


Incident Report - 2026-06-09

The Nightjar Grove incident report said the first pass failed because the retrieval cache was stale. A backup path produced a plausible score, but the reviewer marked it as misleading because the evidence trail did not line up. The report noted that the team would rerun the test after refreshing the cache. Someone proposed using the backup path as a shortcut, yet the note warned against treating it as final. The incident closed with a request for a memo that would name the authoritative run.


Review Memo - 2026-06-24

This memo records the Harbor review alongside two study observations. Nested Verifier Study 1 was said to use calibrated voting and to avoid a reward model. Granite Context Study 4, by contrast, used dense retrieval and did use a reward model. The memo noted that the Harbor team wanted the final write-up to reflect the revised method rather than the older one. A brief comparison to another project was included only to keep the notes complete.


Review Memo - 2026-06-10

The memo reviews the Asterion rerun and summarizes which evidence path survived the checks. It states that the team kept the hybrid evidence path and rejected the earlier dense retrieval idea. The memo also says the failed checkpoint-mismatch pass should be ignored when counting the acceptable attempts. For clarity, the reviewer contrasts this with a separate Anchor note that mentioned a different workflow entirely. The closing line says the rerun became the reference point for later reporting.


Incident Report - 2026-06-21

The incident report said the Citadel review stalled because two source paths disagreed. The older team log was rejected after it was found to include an unapproved note. The cleaner memo draft was kept for the next pass because it matched the handoff discussion. Project Galena was mentioned only to show that another team had a separate issue. The report said the conflict would be resolved in the final memo. No numeric tally was attached to the disagreement.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-04

This weekly report summarizes the recovery work for Project Kelpie Circuit. The rerun completed without the earlier checkpoint problem and produced the result the team wanted. After that success, the group kept the rerun as the only trustworthy run in the packet. The old invalid sweep was retained only for traceability. The update also notes that the review would compare the valid rerun against the failed sweep. No other circuit changed its status in this report.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-07-03

The meeting minutes summarize the Orchard review after the rerun and the small cleanup items that remained. Rhea Voss said the rerun was the only result the team should cite when answering questions about Monsoon Orchard. The group compared two notes: one from the failed pass and one from the rerun, and only the rerun was kept as valid. Tala Iver confirmed the evidence queue was already sorted, but the cross-check list still needed one more pass. A brief aside mentioned a nearby project called Project Bellwether Orchard, though it was not part of this review.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-18

The weekly report says Project Citadel Lagoon finished the week with the corrected assessment in place. It adds that the earlier optimistic draft was no longer being circulated. A short status line says the rerun was the basis for the final summary. The report does not spell out the name of the person who drafted the first review note. The final paragraph says the lagoon work is awaiting publication, not another rerun.


Change Request - 2026-06-27

The change request asks Delta Kernel to shift to the narrower retrieval sweep. Delta Harbor is listed as the person coordinating the revision notes. Rowan Bench is called out only as the failing path from the first pass. The request says the revised sweep should be enough for the next review. A brief comment states that the earlier broad sweep was too noisy.


Email Thread - 2026-06-10

The thread opened with a check-in on Cascade Archive and asked whether the draft route was still the right one. One reply said the team had first considered evidence pooling, but that idea was no longer the lead option. A later message said Cascade Archive had moved to calibrated voting for the current review. Someone added that a separate archive was still using an older path, which should not be copied here. The last note asked the group to treat the newer choice as the active position for the archive.


Experiment Log - 2026-05-20

The experiment log for Xeric Beacon said the rerun exposed a validation snag in the draft reroute. The team found that the early candidate could not be used as the authoritative path because it failed the comparison step. A corrected pass was launched after the revision from the change request was applied. The log also stated that the rerun produced a cleaner result once the questionable path was removed. One margin note said the failure was expected once the comparison filtered out the temporary option.


Incident Report - 2026-05-14

The incident review opens with Project Bellwether and its local alias, Lantern, after the rerun produced mixed results. The first attempt used a compact retrieval setup, but the validation pass showed that the numbers were unstable. A later rerun with the revised alias-expansion path stayed consistent enough to keep under review. The report also mentions that Xeric was only a comparison stream and did not drive the final call. The team asked for a short memo so the cause of the failure and the better rerun would not be confused. A final note says the issue came from the earlier setup rather than from the evaluator itself.


Change Request - 2026-05-15

The change request said Bellwether should move ahead with reward reranking for the next pass. It also noted that the earlier threshold search note was only a draft and should not steer the rerun. The reviewer called the reranking path the current standard after checking the discussion minutes. A brief mention of Anchor appeared as an unrelated comparison point from another team. The request asked for the final label to match the newer path.


Experiment Log - 2026-06-15

This log records the corrected rerun for Project Sycamore Echo after the earlier interruption. The rerun used the same evaluation setup but replaced the broken checkpoint handling with a repaired launch script. That rerun reached a stronger score on the internal trace set and no longer showed the earlier mismatch. A note near the end says the backup path was kept only as a fallback and was not promoted. The engineer also wrote that the rerun belonged to Sycamore Echo alone, even though another project had a similar test schedule. The final line says the result was ready for review by the project owner.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-05-18

The Asterion review opened with a short recap of the rerun and the earlier failure that had delayed the handoff. One trial on Helix-8B was set aside after its validation curve drifted again, so the group treated that path as background rather than a contender. The team then kept the retrieval-focused option in play for the next pass because it was the only variant that matched the evidence checklist. For the follow-up list, Mina Vale stayed on the notes and captured the open questions from the rerun. By the end of the discussion, the group agreed that the revised plan should be checked against the same test set used in the earlier attempt.


Change Request - 2026-06-25

The change request says the Onyx Meadow team moved ahead with a rerun after the slip. It records that the rerun kept the same evidence set but switched to a tighter ranking pass. The request also explains that the earlier provisional route was no longer the preferred option. A short approval note says the revised plan would wait for the resource window before execution. The document does not state whether the rerun had finished by the time of filing.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-05-03

The Asterion team opened with a plan to tighten retrieval before the next benchmark pass. Mara Venn said the first readout would be treated as a rehearsal, not as the final verdict. A small side note mentioned Anchor as a comparison point, but the group kept that reference local to the discussion. The minutes also recorded that the rerun would wait for the review memo to settle the scoring rule. By the end of the meeting, the team had agreed to keep the older path in reserve until the next check.


Review Memo - 2026-06-08

This memo checks which plan should be treated as authoritative for Project Zircon Lagoon. The reviewer states that the calibration route is the one to trust because it matches the signed handoff notes. The older threshold idea is described as a draft that was kept only for context. The memo also says Nadia Cole's follow-up list reflects the accepted path and not the discarded one. A margin comment warns that another team's experiment should not be mixed into this decision.


Email Thread - 2026-06-24

The email thread reports that the Citadel rerun exposed the weakness of the narrow pass. After the failed attempt, the broader path recovered the missing links and became the working choice. One reply notes that the older option should be treated as a rejected comparison, not as the live plan. The thread also mentions a separate note from Project Ypsilon, but only to say that its review was still pending. By the end of the discussion, the group asked for a final memo to confirm the decision.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-03

This notice records a small staffing adjustment for the Galena Delta workstream. Dr. Mira Vale was listed as the review lead for the follow-up pass. The note says the prior reviewer had already summarized the failed shortcut, so the new lead only needed to carry the correction forward. A side comment warns that a different project using a similar alias was not part of this handoff. The team expected the corrected evidence-pooling path to be easier to defend once the comments were merged. The notice ends by asking the lead to keep the final remarks aligned with the rerun timeline.


Resource Notice - 2026-05-19

The resource notice records the final allocation for Bellwether after the storage review. It states that the rerun was approved with two compute pools and a shared scratch area. The earlier larger cache was not reserved, since the smaller pool was enough for the corrected workflow. A note about Project Aurora appears in the margin, but it does not affect Bellwether's allocation. The notice asks readers to treat the approved setup as the only official one for the resubmission.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-26

The resource notice confirms that Project Onyx Meadow received a short compute window for the rerun. It says the team was given one GPU cluster slot and that the slot was tied to the tighter ranking pass. The notice also mentions a separate project with a different support pattern, but that was only background. A final line says the reservation was meant to cover the follow-up work after the calibration slip. The notice does not confirm a completed outcome.


Review Memo - 2026-05-16

This memo summarizes the Aegis review after the retry completed without the earlier drift. The revised setup kept the prompt bundle and dropped the unstable check set from the first attempt. By the end of the review, the team preferred the revised path because it was steadier than the original plan. A note in the margin said the Briar comparison was useful, but Briar was not the final choice for this stream. The memo also mentions that the rerun was considered ready for wider use once the follow-up list was cleared. No further correction was requested after the final readout.


Incident Report - 2026-06-13

The rerun for Jacaranda Lagoon began with the revised retrieval path and completed without a system fault. Earlier, the team had tried a broader pass that produced unstable output, so that result was set aside. Rhea Patel noted that the cleaned-up rerun matched the expected behavior more closely than the discarded attempt. A comparison with Project Bellwether was mentioned only to show that its unrelated monitor alert was not part of this incident. By the end of the report, the lagoon rerun was treated as the valid run for follow-up review. No new blocker was recorded after the corrected pass.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-09

This notice sets aside a small test lane for Project Equinox Harbor while the team prepares its next review. The lane was reserved after the earlier pass looked noisy, but the group still wanted a clean comparison. The note reminds readers that the harbor alias belongs to this project and not to the Dune workstream. A backup slot was also kept open for an optional rerun if the first check stayed unstable. The notice does not claim any final result.


Incident Report - 2026-06-03

This incident report describes the Fenwick Lagoon rerun and the results that followed. The rerun with the cleaner retrieval path completed, but the first pass had already been ruled too noisy for final use. A validation check showed that the rerun still missed one supporting file, which forced a short delay. After the delay, the team kept the rerun output and marked the older route as retired. The report also notes that the validation check was the only step that exposed the missing file.


Experiment Log - 2026-06-11

This experiment log tracks the Echelon Lagoon rerun and the notes from the lab team. The first attempt used a dense retrieval stack, but the rerun shifted to a lighter ranking pass. That rerun improved the evidence trail yet still trailed the comparison baseline on the benchmark. A separate line notes that Rhea Sol kept the analysis notebook for the rerun review. The log ends by saying the team would wait for the memo before locking the choice.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-05-12

The follow-up review for Project Verdant Circuit opened with a recap of the failed broad pass and the cleaner rerun. Mina Hart kept the action list organized and pointed the group back to the rerun results rather than the discarded attempt. The committee agreed that the tighter retrieval path should remain the reference for the next draft of the brief. One attendee briefly suggested a different ranking stack, but that option was set aside because it repeated the earlier noise problem. The minutes closed with a note that the final packet would cite the rerun and not the invalid first pass. A separate discussion about an unrelated storage pilot was mentioned only as background and had no impact on Verdant Circuit.


Review Memo - 2026-06-23

The review memo says the method revision is now the key update for Quartzite Junction. It confirms that the older approach should not be used as the final reference. The memo also states that the support queue remained useful after the change. A closing sentence says the team would keep monitoring the rerun notes for drift. The memo adds that the project was stable enough for the next review cycle.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-12

This notice records the allocation that supported the Kelpie Grove retry. The first pass had already failed, so the extra allocation was approved only for the rerun. The note says the retry needed more room because the alias map was being expanded rather than trimmed. A separate pilot on a different workstream still used the older narrow setup and was not part of this approval. The notice confirms that the retry was the accepted run after the earlier failure. It also records that the allocation was temporary and tied to the rerun window.


Incident Report - 2026-06-19

This incident report covers the failed attempt that preceded the final rerun for Borealis Delta. The failure came from a missing reference bundle, which made the first output unusable. The team did not change the review standard after that problem; instead, they asked for the same check after the bundle was restored. Asterion Harbor was again mentioned in a side note, but only as an unrelated benchmark. By the end of the report, the rerun was still pending and the final status was not yet fixed.


Experiment Log - 2026-05-22

This log records the Mariner Harbor retry and the measurements from the corrected setup. The initial pass failed because of a missing-index problem, so the team marked that output as unusable. The rerun then produced the stronger evidence score, which the reviewers later used as the comparison baseline. A separate calibration for Project Vesper appeared in the notes but was not part of the Harbor decision. After the retry, the analysts kept the revised retrieval path and did not reopen the older configuration. The log says the retry followed the earlier email thread so that everyone would be working from the same correction.


Weekly Report - 2026-05-18

The Citadel weekly report says the team compared an early rerun with a later corrected run. The early rerun was rejected because the output stayed noisy, while the corrected run looked more stable. Leah North kept the status notes and pointed the team toward the corrected version. A mention of Project Daffodil appears only as a separate reference point for another group. The report closes by saying the team would review the corrected run again before declaring success.


Incident Report - 2026-05-09

The incident report for Xeric Circuit describes a failed trial that was stopped before handoff. The initial path overloaded the test setup and left the output too unstable for review. The report recommended rerunning the task with a smaller allocation and a narrower input slice. A different team briefly proposed keeping the same setup, but that idea was rejected in the report. The failure note was kept to explain why the later rerun needed a cleaner starting point.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-06

The review opened with a recap of the successful rerun for Borealis Junction. Dr. Mara Ilyan kept the follow-up list organized after the handoff. The group agreed that the failed pass should stay archived as a warning case. They also noted that the moonlit backup lane was not the basis for the final decision. The last item was a short check that the rerun notes matched the experiment log.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-03

The Cascade Cobalt meeting focused on the next calibration step and the handoff for review. Eli Mercer said the team would try a compact reranking path first, but that option was only provisional. He also noted that Project Cascade Cobalt should keep the alias local and avoid borrowing wording from other workstreams. A separate reminder said the archive copy was still waiting on cleanup before the final note could be sent. The group agreed to revisit the choice after the experiment readout arrived.


Incident Report - 2026-06-12

This report covers the rerun that Project Asterion launched after the first pass showed an instability problem. The initial trial stopped early because the validation trace drifted and the output could not be trusted. A corrected rerun using the denser retrieval path produced a stable result and was marked as the one to keep. The log also records that the older alias-expansion draft was left in the archive rather than promoted. One engineer noted that the rerun was run on the same shared node, which made the comparison easier. A side remark mentioned Project Saffron as an unrelated benchmark case that had its own failure mode.


Review Memo - 2026-06-11

This memo reviews the Parallax Matrix rerun and explains why the first pass was rejected. The invalid run stalled because the retrieval stage returned thin context, while the revised pass kept the same alias-expansion framing and produced a cleaner trace. A note about Project Bellwether mentioned a separate reranking effort, but that work was not part of this review. The memo says the team should treat the revised output as the authoritative one for the final comparison. It also records that the older draft had been archived so nobody would confuse it with the accepted result. The reviewer concluded that the rerun fixed the earlier gap without introducing a new dependency.


Incident Report - 2026-06-14

The rerun for Project Asterion failed the evidence check because the broad alias path pulled in too many unrelated hits. The team marked that pass invalid and set it aside before any review could use it. A narrower retrieval path was then tried for the same workstream, and the cleaner output was kept for comparison. The report noted that Project Citadel had a different issue on the same day, which helped separate the two cases. By the end, the incident log said the correction would become the basis for the next review. No alternate owner was recorded for the discarded pass.


Email Thread - 2026-06-18

Project Citadel’s planning email said the team would start with a compact review pass. Rina Cole suggested keeping the backup notes nearby in case the first pass produced mixed signals. The thread mentioned Project Daffodil as a neighboring effort with a different reviewer. An early reply guessed that the backup path might become the final standard, but that was only tentative. No outcome was locked in at this stage.

No outcome was locked in at this stage.


Change Request - 2026-06-16

The change request says Citadel would rerun the check after replacing the brittle filter step. It explains that the corrected path should use the safer review order instead of the discarded threshold idea. The request also notes that Cascade was only a reference from the earlier incident write-up. A reviewer signed off on the rerun because the first pass had not produced a usable result. The updated plan was framed as a direct response to the failed first pass.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-18

These minutes record the handoff discussion for Project Bellwether Meadow. Bellwether Harbor kept the smaller verification pass as the preferred route after the older sweep was questioned. The group agreed that the review would continue only if the narrowed pass stayed consistent. A note at the end says the follow-up list remained with Asteria Vale. No final benchmark is given in these minutes.


Email Thread - 2026-06-17

The thread confirms that the archive release would keep the validated path as the final reference for Project Echelon Archive. Mina Cho replied that the alternate path was only a discussion item and not the authority for the release. The team also noted that the brief rerun had helped explain the difference, even though it did not become the standard. One message mentions a Bellwether memo about staffing, but that material was unrelated to the archive decision. The last email asks everyone to cite the validated path when describing the Echelon outcome. A short sign-off says the archive record is now settled.


Email Thread - 2026-05-20

The email thread follows up on the Halcyon Matrix staffing question after the meeting. One reply says the smaller backup plan was enough once two reviewers shifted from a neighboring task. Another message confirms that the expensive larger pool stayed off the table. Project Ibis is referenced only to note that its schedule was unrelated to this staffing choice. The final note says the team could proceed with the leaner arrangement for the rerun.


Incident Report - 2026-06-26

This incident note covers a failed retrieval attempt for Parallax Cobalt and the correction that followed. The first pass on the cobalt track stalled because the retrieval cache was not warmed before the run began. That early attempt was treated as invalid, so the team marked the rerun as the only result worth keeping. A side discussion compared the old sparse path with the newer pooling option, but the older path was not carried forward. The same note says the rerun was scheduled after the cache issue was cleared.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-05-12

The Daffodil Junction meeting opened with a recap of the failed attempt on the Cedar lane and a reminder that the first pass was not fit to carry forward. The group agreed to keep the rerun focused on the same evaluation set, but only after the indexing issue was corrected. A note from the earlier draft mentioned a different route, yet that option was set aside once the team saw the error pattern. For the follow-up, the reviewers wanted the output checked against the trace summary before anyone treated it as final. One participant also flagged that the old shortcut would have reused stale artifacts and could have hidden the real fix.


Experiment Log - 2026-06-02

The Bellwether Orchard experiment log covered the screening run for the new retrieval setup. The first attempt used a fallback scorer, but the team marked it as too unstable for the report. A later pass kept the same orchard label while changing the evaluation order. The log noted that the invalid run should remain archived and not drive the conclusion. Tessa Vale recorded the observations before handing them to the reviewer.


Review Memo - 2026-06-12

This memo resolves the Bellwether ownership question after the failed validation and the pending rerun. Jonah Reed remained the point of contact for the retry. The memo says the earlier memory spike had already been tied to the stalled attempt. Lantern stayed the local alias for the same project, while Meridian was only a cross-project distraction. The review closed with the rerun approved under the same test pack.


Review Memo - 2026-05-22

This memo records the closure review for the Aegis-Briar loop. The final decision favored the confidence-calibrated route because the rerun had failed under the broader evidence path. The memo says the older voting path remained as a fallback only. It also notes that the unstable checkpoint mismatch was the main reason the team did not publish the first result. A brief aside names Project Nivalis, but only as an unrelated comparison point. By the end of the review, the team treated the rerun as the authoritative run.


Email Thread - 2026-06-12

The thread follows up on the Nightjar Delta discussion and compares two candidate paths for the next pass. One message argues that dense retrieval should stay in the background because the alias expansion route already fits the current scope. A reply says the older dense retrieval idea was only a fallback and should not be treated as the main plan. Another note mentions that the rerun would be reviewed by Dr. Leena Hart once the draft was cleaned up. The last message asks for a memo title that can be used in the final archive.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-26

The resource notice confirms support for Project Monsoon Meadow during the retry window. It says Node Willow-05 reserved two GPUs for the team so the rerun could finish without queue delays. The notice also mentions a separate reservation for another project, but that allocation was unrelated to the Monsoon Meadow pass. A later line explains that the reserved slot was tied to the same retry discussed in the minutes. The support window was described as temporary and intended only for the final reranking check.


Review Memo - 2026-06-26

This review memo summarizes the final check for Monsoon Nimbus after the rerun settled. The memo says the evidence-pooling route remained the reference standard for the closing review. A prior dense retrieval attempt is mentioned only as a contrast because it was no longer the preferred option. The reviewer noted that the fallback was still worth keeping in reserve for unusual cases. The final sign-off referred to the project simply as Nimbus in the discussion thread. No unresolved blocker remained at the end of the memo.


Incident Report - 2026-06-10

The incident report for Lattice Delta described a confusing draft result that had been circulated too early. It said the draft still needed cleanup because the evidence trail mixed the preliminary pass with the corrected one. A note in the margin mentioned that a separate project was testing a different review lane, but that was not the focus here. The report advised holding the announcement until the corrected version was checked again. The team also logged that the earlier draft should not be cited in the final summary.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-03

These notes cover the follow-up meeting for Borealis Iris after the failed attempt. Mina Sol kept the action list organized while the group compared the stalled pass with the cleaner rerun. The team agreed that the memory issue came from the earlier setup rather than the later one. A brief aside about a separate project was recorded, but it was not part of the decision. The minutes close by saying the recovery note should point readers to the valid rerun instead of the noisy side test.


Incident Report - 2026-05-19

This report covers the failed run that forced Project Asterion to pause the first release attempt. The failure was traced to unstable validation behavior, not to the data bundle itself. A second pass using the older settings was rejected because it repeated the same drift pattern. After the rerun, the team marked the evidence-first path as the safe choice for the next cycle. The report also notes that Kellan Reed prepared a brief correction note for the review packet. No new hardware was requested, since the issue was described as procedural rather than capacity-related.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-01

The Sycamore Summit kickoff opened with a note that the team wanted a cleaner evidence pass for Project Sycamore Summit. Mina Rao said the first pass would stay on dense retrieval unless the rerun showed a better route. A side discussion mentioned Project Delta only as a comparison case for search noise, not as the main line of work. The group agreed to keep the alias ladder local to Sycamore Harbor so later notes would not drift into other projects. They also logged that the old scoring draft would remain provisional until the rerun was complete.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-07-02

The kickoff opened with a recap of the calibration goals for Project Asterion. Mira Vale noted that the first pass would stay small so the team could compare it with a later rerun. Asterion's early path used the lighter retrieval setup, but the group flagged it as a provisional choice. The minutes also mentioned a neighboring effort called Anchor only as a cautionary example, not as the main track. By the end of the meeting, the team agreed to keep the review notes tied to the Asterion alias.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-12

This notice confirms that Bellwether received a limited allocation for the rerun after the earlier capacity issue. The notice says the team was given 2 GPUs for the follow-up attempt and that no larger pool was approved. It adds that the allocation was enough for the revised plan but not for the original, heavier version. The note also mentions that Project Aurora had a separate request in the queue, which should not be mixed into this case. The final sentence says the rerun would proceed under the smaller budget unless a later correction changed the schedule.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-02

The kickoff for Project Galena Archive opened with a check on who would keep the archive notes organized. Mara Quill was named the main steward for Galena, while the team also kept a backup tracker in case the first handoff slipped. A brief note mentioned that the earlier Galena trial had stalled after the intake list was incomplete. The group agreed to rerun the intake with the corrected list rather than reuse the failed pass. One aside compared Galena with a separate archive effort that had a different review cadence and was not part of this handoff.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-23

Xeric Foundry closed the week with the revised rerun completed and the trace mismatch reduced to a minor concern. Ravi Ilyas said the queue arrangement held up through the final pass. The Dune path stayed out of the live workflow and remained only in the archive. The Sandbar trial was not revisited. The team did not record any new blocker after the correction.

The Sandbar trial was not revisited.


Email Thread - 2026-06-10

The Tern Horizon thread opened with a reminder that the first test path had not been stable. One message proposed keeping the older rerank-heavy setup for another check. A reply argued that the older setup was only a placeholder and should not guide the final review. The sender also noted that Horizon still needed a cleaner evidence pass before signoff. By the end of the thread, the team agreed to revisit the plan after the rerun.


Incident Report - 2026-06-02

This incident report covers a rerun glitch in Project Xylem's validation flow. The first pass ran with a small compute allotment and then stalled before the checks were complete. The team treated the stall as a resource issue rather than a logic failure. A side note mentions Project Isobar only as a comparison for how its logs are formatted. The report asks for a cleaner rerun after the queue is cleared.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-20

The weekly report says Project Halcyon Lagoon completed the rerun with the later alias-expansion path. It notes that the rejected retrieval-heavy branch stayed in the archive only for comparison. The report also summarizes the reserved support as three GPU-hours for validation, two GPU-hours for the final check, and a small CPU holdback. One short aside mentions the Cedar pilot again, but it never affected the final Lagoon decision. By the end of the week, the team treated the later path as the standing plan.


Review Memo - 2026-06-12

The approval memo says Bellwether's final allocation was the corrected one, not the provisional slot from the first notice. It credits Rina Sol for flagging the mismatch before sign-off. The memo explains that the smaller temporary slot should be ignored when summarizing the project's actual resource use. A closing remark states that the Sonata comparison was only a distraction and had no bearing on the decision. The final line confirms the review is closed and the rerun may proceed under the updated plan. The approved figure is described as the one that should be cited in future summaries.


Experiment Log - 2026-06-10

This log covers the Bellwether recheck for the mid-June trial. The first pass could not finish because the worker pool was too small for the task. A later rerun used the alias Bellwether and stayed within the tighter budget. That rerun completed cleanly, while an older fallback from Cipher was rejected as unreliable. The note says the team kept the successful rerun because it was the only valid result. A separate mention of Nightjar concerns was only background chatter and did not change the outcome.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-19

The allocation meeting for Project Zircon Summit reviewed the notice and checked which items belonged in the final count. The group agreed that the backup trial stayed outside the rerun total. Priya summarized the running count as two reserved units plus one separate commitment, but only the reserved units were treated as Summit resources. A suggestion to borrow more capacity from another effort was discussed and then rejected. The minutes also mention a late request for a different check, though that request was not added to the plan.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-18

These minutes capture the Ibis Grove planning discussion and the scope check. Nadia Cole stayed on the note-taking side while the team reviewed the next steps. The group briefly compared the main path with a side effort for Project Monsoon Grove, then set that aside. The working plan for Ibis Grove kept the smaller validation pass. No one in the meeting committed to a final rollout date.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-10

The Bellwether weekly report says the team split its compute between two active checks. One branch kept the main retrieval review moving, while another branch handled a smaller calibration pass. The report says the larger share went to Bellwether, and the remainder supported a short validation rerun. A note in the margin mentions that the old Meridian label was only a comparison cue from an earlier cycle. No other project was described as taking priority over Bellwether in this report.


Change Request - 2026-06-19

The change request for Project Ibis Meadow asked to retire the noisy route. It said the cleaner option should become the standard for the rerun. The request cited the earlier discussion as the reason for the switch. It also warned that the rejected path should stay out of the final packet. A short note added that the revision was approved without further edits.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-18

This weekly report tracks the Borealis Lagoon rerun and the follow-up items that stayed open after the first pass. The initial retrieval path was dropped after the team saw unstable validation behavior in the trial. A later rerun on the lagoon setup used a tighter evidence pass and produced a steadier outcome for the review. Mina Rowe kept the action list organized for Project Borealis Lagoon, while the earlier notes still referred to the same workstream by the shorter Borealis label. The team also noted that a separate calibration exercise for Project Galena was not part of this report and should not be mixed into the rerun summary.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-21

These minutes capture the final Daffodil Lagoon review with the follow-up list and the resource check. Lina Park kept the action list organized after the rerun failure. The team agreed that the revised scoring path should remain in place for the next cycle. The review also noted that the rerun had been the only attempt that reached the validation gate. By the end of the meeting, the group confirmed that the open accelerator reserve was still four units.


Incident Report - 2026-06-09

The Citadel Beacon incident report describes a review drift during the first pass. Owen Pike said the team had started with a loose scan, but the result was too noisy to keep. Citadel Ridge was the local alias used in the incident log. A separate lane from a different project was mentioned as a possible shortcut, then rejected. The report recommends waiting for a cleaner comparison before the next review.


Review Memo - 2026-06-13

This memo reviews the rerun outcome for Project Asterion and compares it with the discarded setup from the earlier meeting. The rerun produced cleaner evidence ordering than the first attempt, which had been rejected after the sync failure. The reviewer says the tighter retrieval path is now the preferred standard for the next pass. A brief note warns not to confuse this with Project Anchor's separate calibration work, which was discussed only as a distraction. The memo closes by saying the team should keep the revised checklist in place unless a new issue appears.


Experiment Log - 2026-06-19

This log records the rerun for Project Ypsilon Kernel after the earlier unstable pass. The first attempt with Cedar-8B failed because the validation curve drifted too sharply near the end. The rerun switched to a different retrieval setup and finished cleanly with steadier evidence ordering. A brief note says the rerun used the reserved compute block from the planning meeting and did not need extra hardware. The final line marks the rerun as the version the reviewers should trust for the status update.


Incident Report - 2026-06-04

The incident report covers the Ultraviolet Kernel rerun that followed the email thread. The rerun failed because the validation pass became unstable near the end. A backup run completed, but it used the abandoned data-mixing route and was not treated as final. The report says the contrastive-tuning path stayed under review even after the failure. The operators noted that the backup would not settle the decision because it followed the earlier draft. The team asked for one more look before closing the matter.


Review Memo - 2026-05-09

The memo said the corrected rerun became the review standard for Asterion. It credited Mina Sol's checklist for keeping the evidence order stable after the failed attempt. The older shortcut was described as useful for exploration, but not for the final handoff. The reviewer also noted that the Meridian pilot still used a different retrieval style, so the two efforts should not be conflated. By the end, the memo marked the corrected rerun as approved and the earlier noisy pass as invalid.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-07

Kelpie Orchard closed the week with the clean rerun accepted for follow-up work. The report repeats that the conflict run stayed archived and was not promoted. The orchard line now points to the rerun notes and the review memo as the main references. A short aside mentions a second validation lane, but it did not change the decision. The final status says the project is ready for the next handoff.


Email Thread - 2026-06-17

The email thread asks whether the dropped path should still be archived for future comparison. One reply says the archive decision was not captured in the final memo. Another reply notes that the team had already moved on to the settled revision. The thread also mentions that a separate Wildfire note was circulating in another channel. No sender confirms whether the archive request was approved or declined.


Weekly Report - 2026-05-22

This weekly report summarizes the Wildfire Falcon follow-up after the review memo. The team did not adopt the provisional reranker, and the earlier route remained the working standard. A separate line says the follow-up list stayed short because the blocked idea had already been dropped. The report also notes that a different project was testing node scheduling changes, which had no effect here. By the final check-in, the Falcon effort was described as stable and ready for the next validation pass. No new obstacle was added after the memo.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-13

The weekly report for Aurora Circuit said the rerun and follow-up check had both stayed inside the approved reserve. The report also noted that the larger pool request was no longer being considered. The team marked the revised reserve as sufficient for the current phase. A draft paragraph still hinted that the final memo might ask for more room, but that line was crossed out. The closing note said the project was ready for the next review once the summary was filed.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-09

This weekly report covers the Cascade Iris revision review and the handoff that followed. The first draft leaned on Helix-8B, but the team later marked that path as too noisy for the final comparison. A revised pass using Marble-3B was called the cleaner option because it handled the alias references more consistently. The report also notes that the old draft should not be mixed with the final summary. For the record, Cascade Iris kept the same review owner through both passes. The closing line says the revision was ready for distribution once the final notes were checked.


Review Memo - 2026-06-13

This memo records the authority call for Halcyon Nimbus after the planning thread. Irene Soto confirmed that the verification-first path should replace the earlier compact route for the rerun. The memo explains that the compact route was kept only for comparison because it had not met the review bar. It also notes that the rerun would use the same project scope, even though a different team had been discussing a reranking experiment. The final recommendation was to proceed with the verification-first path.


Change Request - 2026-05-20

This change request records the method discussion for Project Citadel after the incident report. The team debated whether to keep the original scoring path or shift to a cleaner rerun workflow. The final request favored the cleaner rerun workflow because the rejected pass had been noisy. The note says the Quartzite shorthand should continue to point at the revised path. A brief comparison with Meridian was included only as background and did not affect the Citadel decision. The request was signed off as a revision, not as a restart from scratch.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-17

The discussion for Project Ibis Meadow opened with a review of the old plan. Rina Vale argued that the earlier route was too noisy for a final check. The team considered a fallback path, then agreed to keep the cleaner option for the next pass. A side conversation mentioned another project with a similar issue, but that was not part of Meadow. The notes ended with a request to document the decision before the follow-up review.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-14

The final status for Lattice Delta said the corrected wording was now the official version. It confirmed that the draft had been archived and would not return to the active notes. The report also mentioned that the review lane was stable, even though one supporting citation was still being checked elsewhere. A closing line said the team could move on without reopening the earlier confusion. No new issue was recorded for the Delta workstream.


Change Request - 2026-05-18

The change request for Project Tern Meadow proposed a cleaner intake path for the next review cycle. Lina Park argued that the older path was hard to audit, so the team should move to the revised flow. The draft also mentioned Tern Harbor as the local alias for the same workstream. A temporary fallback route was listed for testing, but it was not intended to survive the review. The request ended by asking for a rerun once the revised flow was in place.


Email Thread - 2026-06-24

The final status email said Project Briar had completed the revised check and closed the incident. It noted that Talia Noor kept the review summary aligned with the cleaned-up trail. The sender repeated that the fallback remained archived and was no longer the working choice. One reply mentioned Project Fable as background, but no Briar action depended on it. The thread ended with confirmation that the approved path was the corrected one from the memo.


Change Request - 2026-04-26

This request covers the revision that followed the weak first pass in Orchard. The team switched away from the provisional setup and asked for a rerun with a cleaner path. They said the adjustment was needed because the earlier run had not been stable enough to trust. The request also pointed back to the original log so the rerun could be compared against it. A side comment mentioned a different Orchard project, but it was not the subject here.


Weekly Report - 2026-05-12

The weekly report said Bellwether completed the rerun after the queue cleared. It recorded that the team used three GPUs for the final pass and two more on a backup node. The earlier noisy pass was left out of the summary because it failed to stabilize. Rin Vale confirmed that the Xeric pilot had its own allocation and did not share the Bellwether pool. The report ended with a note that the rerun now served as the reference run.


Review Memo - 2026-06-15

This memo reviews the Citadel results after the invalid rerun. Lena Ortiz was listed as the evaluation owner for the project. The memo says the corrected reading, not the stale rerun, should guide the final report. It also notes that the earlier pass and the rerun should not be averaged together. A passing mention of Project Asterion was included only to contrast old and current practice.


Change Request - 2026-06-14

This change request explains why the earlier option for Tern Iris was revised after the review. The team found that the broad label expansion path pulled in too many false matches. They replaced it with alias expansion because the narrower path kept the evidence cleaner. A note in the margin says Project Galena was testing a different filter, but that was only background context. The new choice was treated as the final working method for the next pass.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-08

This notice explains the compute hold for Bellwether's next rerun. The team reserved four GPUs for the main pass and kept a smaller backup slot in case the first attempt slipped. A note from the scheduler said the hold would stay in place until the review memo arrived. Bellwether's alias was used in the notice because the project had two closely related workstreams. The smaller slot was described as support only, not the target allocation for the rerun.


Review Memo - 2026-06-26

This review memo gives the closing status for Onyx Nimbus. The final note says the rerun, not the archived shortcut, should be treated as authoritative. The memo also says the project stayed on the local alias Onyx for the rest of the review cycle. A brief comparison marks the discarded run as invalid because it failed the same check twice. The closing line states that no further rerun was needed. The memo does not introduce any new project identity.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-12

The kickoff covered the first retrieval plan for Project Asterion and a few nearby workstreams used as contrast points. Mina Adler was named the retrieval lead for Asterion, while Project Bellwether kept its own review lane separate. The group agreed that the initial path would rely on alias expansion before any rerun was trusted. One note warned that the older Anchor reference was only background context and should not guide the new setup. The minutes closed by saying the follow-up would check whether the first pass was stable enough to keep.


Experiment Log - 2026-05-08

This log captures the rerun notes for Jacaranda Summit after the first pass stalled. Aster-8B posted a strong score for the summit team on RiverBench-3 using Willow-05, but that result was only part of the picture. The earlier Jacaranda attempt with Finch-3B on Juniper-06 failed after a missing-index problem. The team then set aside the failed path and kept the calibration track under review. A later check pointed to a different calibration choice for the summit workstream.


Incident Report - 2026-06-14

The Citadel report describes a bad rerun that failed after the team followed the wrong evidence trail. The failure was traced to a stale handoff note, which sent the reviewers toward an outdated path. Nia Voss recorded that the rejected path should not be used again for the final review. A mention of Aurora appears only as a side comparison to a different project with a cleaner handoff. The report closes by saying Citadel would rerun the check once the handoff was corrected.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-07

The weekly report says Galena Cobalt finished the rerun and kept the stable training mix as the working standard. It notes that the comparison run was archived because the earlier failure could not be used for signoff. The report adds that the team spent four GPUs on the rerun and one more on the final check. A closing line says the review packet now points to the rerun rather than the broken first attempt. The final paragraph says the status was ready for a handoff once the summary was circulated.


Resource Notice - 2026-05-24

This notice covers the Caldera validation window and the temporary compute booking. The first reservation gave the team a single accelerator, which was enough for the dry run but not for the full rerun. A note from the coordinator said the broader rerun would wait until the booking was corrected. The notice also mentions Project Willow as a nearby workload, but only as a scheduling side note. Caldera kept the compact evaluation path while waiting for the updated resource slot.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-03

The Jacaranda Beacon team opened the session by reviewing the retrieval plan and the fallback path for the week. Mina Rao said the first pass should rely on chunked retrieval, while the Beacon alias would stay local to this project. The group also noted a side experiment on a nearby archive, but that line was only background context and not part of the main workstream. By the end of the discussion, the team agreed that the older path would be kept only as a comparison point. A follow-up note was promised for the rerun after the indexing fix was checked.


Change Request - 2026-06-13

The revision memo said Project Citadel would stop relying on the older path and move to the cleaner option for the rerun. It explained that the newer choice reduced confusion in the edge-case review and made the notes easier to compare. Rin Calder approved the change after checking that the remaining cases still matched the intended scope. The memo also warned that a stray note about Project Asterion should not be mixed into Citadel's record. By this point, the older path was already being phased out.


Incident Report - 2026-06-09

Asterion logged a failed attempt when the run exhausted memory before the retrieval pass finished. The incident note said the failure came from a wider batch size, not from the data bundle itself. After that setback, the team marked the prior configuration as unreliable for the rerun. A side comment mentioned Meridian only as a comparison point for another project’s older review, not as the current owner of this work. The report recommended keeping the follow-up focused on the leaner setup that had survived the smoke test.


Change Request - 2026-06-18

The change request asked to lock in the wider pass and retire the brittle reranker. It noted that the invalid attempt had already been removed from the active queue. Nina Vale wanted the new wording to match the review memo rather than the earlier experiment log. The request also preserved a short note about why the rerun had been trusted. No added capacity was requested because the accepted path was already running cleanly.


Weekly Report - 2026-05-23

The status report for Aurora Junction said the corrected summary replaced the provisional path in the final review. It recorded that the team counted three confirmed items after cleanup. Nina Holt kept the wrap-up notes organized and flagged one leftover citation for later. The report also mentioned a different stream that had only two confirmed items, which served as background. Aurora Junction ended the week with the cleaned record and no open objections. The old failed dry run was not reinstated.


Review Memo - 2026-06-10

The memo confirmed that the active Bellwether package, not the older draft, was the one that cleared the final review. It credited Sana Qureshi with keeping the notes synchronized after the cleanup. The memo also explained that the dead-end draft had been useful only as a comparison point. After the compute slot opened, the validation step finished without needing the standby worker. The closing line marked the package as ready for release.


Review Memo - 2026-06-16

The review memo says the rerun is the accepted path for Ibis Cobalt. It explains that the invalid first pass is excluded from the final comparison. The memo also notes that the side comparison helped confirm the new scoring rule. A closing paragraph says the revised path should be treated as the current baseline for signoff. The memo title is used in the thread as the main anchor for the final decision.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-12

This notice reserved support for the rerun that replaced the failed branch in Cascade Delta. The valid path was given three units after the earlier branch was ruled out. A separate note mentioned a larger reserve for the discarded branch, but that allocation was never used. The team kept the smaller reservation because it matched the rerun’s lighter load. No other support change was approved for this cycle.


Incident Report - 2026-06-10

This incident report covers Project Briar Harbor after a runback exposed a weak handoff between stages. The first pass was marked unstable because the evidence bundle arrived out of order. A correction was prepared, but the team kept it separate until the review could confirm the fix. The report also mentions a neighboring system that had a different routing issue, which was not the one under review here. The last note says the corrected path should be checked against the same handoff rules before closeout.


Review Memo - 2026-06-11

The memo reviews the correction for Project Briar Harbor and compares it with the unstable first pass. It says the correction was accepted because the handoff now kept the evidence bundle in sequence. The memo also explains that the earlier pass was left as a cautionary example for future reruns. A brief aside notes that another project still had a backlog problem, but that did not affect Briar Harbor's decision. The reviewers asked for one more weekly summary so the final status could be recorded cleanly.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-27

The Willow Harbor weekly report opened with the final review of the evidence workflow. An earlier hybrid retrieval path had been tested first, but the rerun moved away from that option. The team kept document chunking as the working path because it made the evidence notes easier to trace. A separate pilot on another project still used reward reranking, which was mentioned only as a comparison point. The report ended by saying the Harbor review would continue with the chunked version.


Weekly Report - 2026-05-27

The closing report for Project Ultraviolet Meadow said the final path was now confirmed. It pointed back to the experiment log for the reason the first pass had failed. The report also said the reserved lab slot could be released after review. Ultraviolet Harbor remained the name used in the handoff summary. The team concluded that the Meadow effort was complete except for routine archiving.


Change Request - 2026-06-20

This request records the calibration update for Kelpie Summit after the weekly report. The team asked to keep the rerun as the active path and to retire the unstable trial. The note says the update was prompted by the earlier validation issue. A small compute hold was mentioned for the next replay window. The request did not reopen the discarded trial.


Change Request - 2026-05-30

This change request captures the follow-up for Project Galena Beacon after the review team compared the failed path with the rerun. The invalid path was kept only as a cautionary reference because it had not held up under review. For the final pass, the team kept the evidence-first approach and asked for a short confirmation memo once the rerun settled. Mara Vale was noted as the person organizing the remaining questions for Galena Beacon. The note mentions that Galena Harbor was still the local alias used inside this project, which helped separate it from other beacon efforts.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-05-23

The follow-up meeting for Verdant Kernel opened with a recap of the failed first pass and the steadier rerun. Mina Kwon summarized the rerun and said the alias-expansion route was the one they would keep. Jonah Lee pointed out that the invalid pass had been too noisy, while the rerun matched the review criteria. The group also mentioned that Project Wildfire Kernel was on a separate track and should not be mixed into the Verdant notes. A short staffing aside confirmed that the data steward was still handling the follow-up list after the rerun. The minutes ended with agreement to treat the rerun as the authoritative result for the next memo.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-04

The weekly report says Wildfire Echo moved from the unstable baseline to a cleaner rerun after the review memo landed. The corrected pass used the same evaluation set, which made the comparison with the failed baseline straightforward. The report also notes that the rerun is now the only result the team is willing to cite in status updates. A short aside says another project had a compute reservation dispute, but that did not change Wildfire Echo's status. Malik Chen is again mentioned as the person who kept the follow-up list in order.


Review Memo - 2026-06-21

This memo reviewed the Jacaranda Cobalt rerun and the earlier invalid pass. The reviewer said the older path should remain archived because the rerun was the only result that survived checks. The memo also mentioned that Mina Vale had already organized the follow-up notes around the rerun. A short appendix compared the rerun with a separate experiment from Project Kelpie Cobalt, but that comparison was only contextual. The closing line approved the rerun as the final reference for Project Jacaranda Cobalt. No further method change was requested after that review.


Review Memo - 2026-06-14

The final memo for Parallax Delta closes out the rerun review with a concise status update. It says Delta Harbor finished the check with no open blockers on the main track. The memo repeats that calibrated voting remained the chosen standard after the earlier evidence pooling path was retired. A brief note mentions that a side test named Harbor Glass still needed cleanup, but it was not part of the approved result. The closing paragraph states that the rerun is the version the team will cite going forward. One sentence also credits the tightening of the filter list for the cleaner outcome.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-05-25

During the follow-up, Kira Frost said the Fenwick plan should keep the main support slot because the rerun had been cleaner. Iris Stone disagreed at first and pointed to the fallback idea, but the group treated that as a backup only. The minutes note that the cleaner rerun settled the dispute and became the working reference. A separate comment about Project Echelon Nimbus was only used to compare how another team handled its revision. By the end, the discussion returned to Fenwick's own support schedule and left the fallback unselected.


Incident Report - 2026-06-10

The Citadel Archive incident report says the first candidate path broke during validation and produced an incomplete archive pass. Rina Vale noted that the error came from a missing index, not from the data source itself. The report mentions a second candidate that still looked viable but had not been tested under the same load. A short remark says the team should keep the broken path only for reference when they compare the rerun. The incident closed with a recommendation to rerun using the more stable path before the weekly review.


Incident Report - 2026-06-04

This incident report describes a failed check during the Project Ypsilon Lagoon rerun. The rerun stopped after a checkpoint inconsistency appeared in the validation stage. A second attempt was launched after the team restored the prior settings from the draft branch. That second attempt completed, but the report says the first failure should not be counted as the accepted outcome. The note closes by saying the lagoon team kept the cleaner rerun for the final review packet. A separate mention of a node swap appears in the margin, but it is marked as unrelated to the accepted result.


Incident Report - 2026-06-19

The incident note for Verdant Nimbus says the earlier pass stalled when the index bundle was incomplete. In the same note, the team recorded that the rerun cleared the blockage after the missing bundle was restored. A side comment says Verdant Harbor was the shorthand used in the chat thread, which helped keep the follow-up list aligned. The report also mentions a separate warning from Project Citadel, but that alert did not affect this project. By the end, the rerun was treated as the authoritative result for Verdant Nimbus.


Change Request - 2026-06-18

This change request records the Citadel retry plan after the first pass missed its target. The draft recommends keeping the same data slice but switching to a cleaner rerun window. The earlier pass is described as noisy, so the team marked it as a poor reference for the final review. An aside mentions Project Xeric as another group waiting on compute, though it is unrelated here. The request ends by asking for the rerun to be approved once the resource note is confirmed.


Email Thread - 2026-05-15

The follow-up thread confirmed that the approved procedure would be used in the next handoff. Talia Noor replied that the archived brittle path would not return unless the team reopened the request. The thread also mentioned a separate data-cleaning effort, which stayed outside Wildfire Circuit. One message asked whether the earlier trial should be retried, and the answer was no because the final standard had already been set. The last note asked recipients to treat the lighter procedure as the current reference.


Change Request - 2026-06-17

The change request for Project Aurora Summit proposes a correction after the failed verification pass. Leah argued that the fallback route should be kept only as a backup and not as the main fix. The preferred correction was to tighten alias expansion before another rerun. A broader rewrite was considered but set aside because it would have changed too much at once. The request closes by saying the team wanted the next pass to measure the tightened path against the failed one.


Email Thread - 2026-06-18

The planning thread opens with Project Aurora Nimbus and a reminder that the team wanted a cleaner evidence path. Jonah Lee said the first draft leaned too hard on a noisy filter and should be replaced. The group then settled on a rerun that used the lighter path instead. Aurora Cove was used as the local alias in the thread, while a mention of Project Kelpie pointed to an unrelated side effort. The sender asked for one more check before the final summary was written. No one in the thread claimed the noisy filter should remain the default.


Change Request - 2026-05-23

This request proposed a capacity adjustment for Project Bellwether after the first check showed the buffer was thin. The team considered a larger reservation, but that idea was set aside once the rerun scope was narrowed. After the revision, the remaining allocation was described as enough for the final pass and the review notes. Tomas Quill drafted the change text and linked it to the same follow-up thread used in the notice. The request said the older branch should stay inactive unless the review turned up a new blocker.


Review Memo - 2026-06-13

This memo reviews the Kelpie Echo rerun and separates the valid branch from the abandoned one. The valid branch is the one that kept the evidence trail intact and stayed aligned with the coordinated follow-up. The discarded branch is mentioned only to explain why the team did not carry it forward. Jon's notes are cited as the source of the final follow-up order. The memo closes by saying the review is complete and the active branch remains the approved path.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-05

Asterion closed the week with the rerun accepted and the review queue trimmed to the revised path. The team noted that the cleaner evidence trail reduced the need for manual checks. Mira Sol remained the contact for follow-up questions, and she kept the new notes aligned with the memo. The report also mentions that an older draft from Meridian was ignored because it did not match the rerun. Overall, the project status was steady, with the revised filter treated as the final working choice.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-08

The Wildfire Meadow meeting opened with a reminder that the first draft still leaned on a coarse filtering style. Several attendees argued that the rough filter was useful for triage but not ready to carry the final review. A side note referred to a separate test lane that had already been showing better stability after a cleanup pass. The chair said the team should compare the old path with the cleaner rerun before choosing what to keep. No one treated the first draft as settled, and the minutes ended with a request for a follow-up memo.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-16

The weekly report for Lattice Lagoon opened with a summary of the latest validation cycle. Priya Nand said the first route had stalled, so the team shifted attention to a corrected rerun. A note about Project Daffodil was included as a separate example of a parallel effort, not the lagoon work. The report said the corrected pass was now the main baseline for review. One earlier draft had suggested keeping the stalled route, but that idea was dropped. The team asked for comments only on the updated baseline.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-10

The Isobar Harbor team opened by sketching a cautious rerun for the harbor pipeline and asked everyone to keep the notes tied to the same workstream. A first pass under the Harbor label was marked as too brittle, so the group set it aside and kept only the cleaner rerun for discussion. Mina Cho said the revised path should stay paired with the retrieval checks, while the older draft would be mentioned only as a contrast. The memo also flagged a separate training branch for Project Briar, but that side effort was not part of the harbor plan. By the end of the meeting, the team agreed that the rerun would be the basis for the next review.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-29

The meeting opened with a brief check of the Willow Harbor follow-up list. Dr. Theo Grant was assigned as the data steward for Project Saffron in a separate administrative update. The team said that the assignment would help keep follow-up items organized. An older Aster error-analysis note was mentioned as background. No new Harbor action replaced the prior review plan during the meeting.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-18

The Asterion Beacon team opened the week by reviewing the retrieval pipeline and the handoff list for the relay. Mira Vale noted that the first pass was too broad, so the group kept the narrower evidence sweep as the working option. Asterion Harbor was used as the local alias for the same project in the draft notes. The rerun with the broader filter was set aside after it pulled in unrelated passages. By the end of the meeting, the team agreed to keep the compact review path for the next check.


Incident Report - 2026-06-24

The rerun for Project Asterion failed after the search layer could not see the refreshed index. Jae Lin wrote that the failure was tied to a missing input bundle rather than the scoring script. A quick retry was attempted with the same setup, but that attempt was also discarded. The note marked the older fallback as invalid for reporting because it had not been tested under the updated inputs. Asterion’s team then asked for a cleaned rerun before any result summary would be shared.


Review Memo - 2026-06-11

This memo reviewed the Lattice Cobalt rerun and the failed first pass. The reviewer said the rerun was now the authority because the first pass had already been rejected. The memo also stated that Tessa Ilyas kept the follow-up notes aligned with that decision. A comparison line said the rejected pass and the valid rerun should not be counted together. The closing sentence confirmed the rerun as the final status for Project Lattice Cobalt.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-02

The huddle opened with Asterion reviewing the rerun schedule and the backup path for the next validation pass. Mira Chen said the team should keep the alias-expansion idea in reserve, but the dense retrieval option looked safer for the main run. Asterion had already seen one earlier attempt stall because the index bundle was incomplete. For the follow-up, the group agreed to watch the rerun closely and compare it against the earlier broken attempt. The minutes also noted that the final check would be handled after the rerun finished.


Review Memo - 2026-05-19

The final review said Citadel's rerun held up and replaced the failed attempt in the record. The memo credited the reserved unit and the corrected setup for the clean rerun. After checking the incident report and the resource notice, the reviewer closed the case as stable. The old pass remained the only rejected one. The project was left in a finished state rather than waiting for another retry.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-22

The weekly report says Galena Falcon moved from troubleshooting to final review after the corrected rerun held steady. It records that the team kept the alias Galena visible in the recap because several readers had confused it with another project line. The report states that the abandoned pass remained in the log only as a warning and was not counted in the final status. A follow-up note says the review standard became the corrected rerun's output. The writer also mentions that the earlier mismatch was treated as the reason for the reset. The closing line says no further changes were needed before handoff.


Incident Report - 2026-05-05

This incident report covers the failed first pass for Project Daffodil Summit and the correction that followed. The initial pass stopped early after the lookup cache was missing a required index shard. After that failure, the rerun completed and produced a stable result for the summit's review packet. A separate note said Project Citadel had a naming cleanup in progress, but that work did not affect Daffodil Summit. The report also stated that the rerun was treated as the authoritative run for later discussion. No further action was needed once the corrected run replaced the broken attempt.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-18

The weekly report says Ibis Cobalt reached signoff after the accepted rerun was reviewed. It states that the invalid pass stayed out of the tally, while the rerun carried the status forward. The report mentions three GPUs for the rerun and one GPU for the final sweep. A short note says the side comparison was archived because it was only a supporting check. The last line confirms the baseline remains the revised path from the memo.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-10

The weekly report opened with the Lattice Archive status review and a reminder to keep the main lane distinct from side work. A first pass using alias expansion was described, but the team said it was not sturdy enough for the Archive. The denser retrieval path was kept for the rerun after the first pass stalled. A separate error-analysis lane was tracked only as background work. The report asked the group to preserve the review notes for the final filing.


Change Request - 2026-06-16

The Nightjar Summit change request describes a revision to the retrieval plan after the first review. The team moved away from the older dense setup and kept the hybrid path under consideration. A short note explains that the revision was prompted by uneven evidence coverage in the draft. The request also mentions a separate project with a similar trigger, but that case was not adopted here. By the end of the request, the team had narrowed the shortlist to one path for the next check.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-19

This notice records the capacity reserved for Project Ravel Nimbus after the rerun. The team kept 3 GPUs for the accepted lane and left the unstable pass out of the allocation. A note says the broader lane needed the reservation, while the narrow lane was only a discarded trial. Project Quartzite Nimbus appears here only as a nearby project with a different review rhythm. The notice was circulated before the weekly status meeting.


Incident Report - 2026-06-07

The follow-up report says the archive review stayed stable after the new ranking pass was adopted. It notes that the earlier noisy comparisons were traced to the old scoring path rather than to the archive data itself. The report confirms that no rollback was needed because the revised path had already been approved. A final note mentions that another team had a separate rerun problem, but Halcyon's issue was already resolved. The incident summary therefore treats the revised ranking pass as the settled authority.


Change Request - 2026-06-15

The change request opens with Project Citadel Kernel and a request to clean up the draft before review. The local alias Citadel Harbor was used in the handoff note so the reviewers would know which stream to follow. The first draft kept a broad summary, but the team wanted a narrower version after feedback. A separate project’s formatting tweak was mentioned for contrast and did not affect this request. The request says the revised draft should become the basis for the next review cycle. The old wording was left in the archive only for comparison.


Resource Notice - 2026-07-04

The notice reserved six GPUs for the Bellwether rerun window. Three more GPUs were added after the team decided the broader check needed extra headroom. A smaller allocation had been proposed earlier, but it was not the final reservation. The notice tied the reservation to the calibration rerun rather than to the initial baseline pass. No other project in the batch shared that combined reservation.


Review Memo - 2026-07-10

The review memo states that Bellwether’s final cause was calibration drift. It says the logging glitch was the wrong lead and should not be treated as the source of the outage. The rerun with the narrower window cleared the fault and restored the relay test. Mina Rho added that the corrected path was now the only one worth keeping in the record. The memo closes by saying the earlier suspicion was discarded after the review.


Resource Notice - 2026-05-18

This resource notice sets out the support plan for Project Fenwick Summit. The team reserved 3 GPUs for the rerun and kept them separate from the earlier failed attempt. A note mentioned that Project Lattice had its own reservation request, but that was unrelated to Fenwick Summit. The notice said the rerun would be the only pass counted in the final summary. The older reservation draft was left in place only as a reference.


Review Memo - 2026-06-26

The review memo for Project Lattice Kernel summarized the open questions after the comparison cycle. It said the team had not yet documented a final choice and that the lead reviewer had asked for one more pass. The memo referred back to the meeting minutes and the weekly report as the current record of the discussion. It also noted that a different project had already closed its own review, which made the missing Lattice decision more noticeable. The memo closed without naming a final standard, leaving the outcome unresolved.


Weekly Report - 2026-05-18

This weekly status note covers the current condition of Project Echelon Meadow after the revision settled. The retry was still active, and the old broad filter stayed retired. Tara Wynn recorded that the follow-up run had enough support for completion. The memo also says the team did not reopen the earlier objection. One line mentions that a neighboring project had a separate queue, which is not part of Meadow's status. The closing sentence says the project was stable enough for the next review cycle.


Change Request - 2026-06-05

This change request updates the resource plan for Cascade Junction after the weekly review. The approved version keeps the compact lane and drops the oversized staging pool. The request explains that the smaller setup covers the rerun without risking spillover. It also says the reserve stack should remain available only as a fallback. The final signoff points back to the report rather than the discarded draft.


Incident Report - 2026-06-18

The rerun for Galena Echo started with the revised prompting setup already in place. A first pass stalled because the evidence bundle was incomplete, so the team marked it invalid. After the pause, the operator repeated the run with the fuller bundle and kept the same structured prompting path. That second attempt completed without the earlier stall, and the notes called it the usable result. A brief aside said Project Citadel had a separate node issue, but that did not affect this rerun.


Email Thread - 2026-05-22

The email thread asked whether the older path or the revised path should guide Project Echelon Nimbus. Kira Frost replied that the older path had already been retired after the noisy test. She added that the revised path matched the handoff notes and should remain the reference. Another message brought up Project Daffodil Nimbus as background, but its rerun story was separate. By the end of the thread, everyone agreed to keep the revised path for the episode.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-07

This weekly report summarizes how Onyx Delta used the reserved support during the rerun. The team says the short validation window was enough to complete the clean repeat. The report also notes that the backup run was left out of the final summary because it did not reflect the corrected setup. A follow-up line says the rerun produced the result the group wanted. The closing note asks for a final review of the remaining items.


Email Thread - 2026-06-09

The Halcyon Nimbus thread began with a request to simplify the retrieval setup before the next review. One message proposed a compact chunking route, but another reply warned that the old route had already produced uneven evidence. Nico Vale then suggested a verification-first path, describing it as the safer option for the rerun. A side remark compared the proposal with a different lab effort that was still using a heavier reranking stack. By the end of the thread, the team had not yet locked the final choice.


Review Memo - 2026-06-09

The Javelin Harbor memo compared two calibration paths and asked the team to keep the more conservative one in view. Lena Ortiz wrote that the earlier option leaned on a broad alias expansion, but the newer option trimmed the scope and fit the harbor use case better. The note also mentioned Project Fable as a separate review line, which should not be mixed into the harbor decision. A small appendix recorded that the first draft still appeared in circulation, even though the team expected it to be superseded. The memo closed by saying the next update would confirm whether the narrower path held up under review.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-05-11

The Asterion standup opened with a recap of the failed pass that had tripped over unstable validation behavior. The team agreed to keep the rerun focused on the corrected data path rather than the earlier draft path. Mina Sol kept the follow-up list organized after the handoff, and she flagged the old dashboard note as stale. Asterion's first proposal was to keep the same calibration setting, but that option was treated as the fallback only. By the end of the meeting, the group expected the rerun to replace the earlier result if the corrected pass held.


Email Thread - 2026-06-22

The email thread compares the accepted rerun for Ravel Echo with an earlier attempt that had looked promising at first. Evan Shah wrote that the accepted pass was cleaner, while the older attempt was kept only as a fallback reference. Another reply notes that the fallback should not be counted in the final summary because it never cleared review. The thread also mentions a side test from a different project, but that result was intentionally left out of the decision. By the end of the thread, the cleaner rerun remained the version everyone planned to cite.


Incident Report - 2026-05-16

This report records the failed first attempt for Project Asterion and explains why the team paused before retrying. The run stalled when the cache layer became unstable, which made the earlier ranking pass unreliable. The incident log says the team rejected the earlier sparse path because it produced inconsistent follow-up answers. A backup check using a denser index completed, but it was not accepted as the final result because it lacked the required comparison step. The report ends by saying the rerun should reuse the same data slice but avoid the unstable cache behavior.


Experiment Log - 2026-05-20

This experiment log covers Citadel Echo's mid-May rerun. The first pass with Kestrel-8B was unstable, so the team did not keep that setup. A later run using River-3B produced the cleaner result the reviewers preferred. The log also mentioned that a different project was still on threshold search, but that was only background. Citadel Echo kept the cleaner run as the one worth comparing against future changes. The earlier unstable path stayed in the notes only as a caution.


Change Request - 2026-07-06

The change request records the fix that replaced the earlier timeline note for Nightjar Orchard. Mira Sol asked for the update to be applied because the old checkpoint wording no longer matched the verified run. The revised note became the reference for the Orchard work, while the older wording was kept only for audit history. A side comment said the Bellwether draft still had an open question, but that issue did not affect Nightjar Orchard. The request closed with the updated checkpoint still in force.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-24

The final call for Wildfire Matrix reopened the source dispute from the email thread. After checking the notes, the chair said the archive note still outranked the newer citation route. The group then locked the summary to the older file and closed the debate. One attendee briefly mentioned a Bellwether appendix, but it was not part of the decision. The minutes record that the draft wording was updated to match the trusted source.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-18

These notes cover the first planning pass for Project Daffodil Circuit and the follow-up items from the same session. The team compared two paths for the rerun, but the older path was set aside after the review flagged inconsistent labels. Mina Vale said the circuit should keep the alias Daffodil Ridge local to this project so the handoff notes stayed readable. A short test with the fallback parser looked promising, yet it was only treated as a check and not the final route. By the end of the meeting, the group agreed to keep the corrected workflow as the working plan for the next run.


Incident Report - 2026-06-09

The Quartzite Matrix incident report says the calibration pass broke down before the team could finish its comparison sweep. The failure was tied to a missing-index problem, not to the later resource shortage that came up in planning. A short aside mentions Project Galena as a separate effort that was still on its own schedule. The report recommends rerunning the same calibration flow after the indexing issue is repaired. It also notes that the earlier pass should not be used as the baseline for any final summary. The incident closes by saying the team will wait for a fresh allocation before trying again.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-17

This notice confirms the compute reservation for Project Citadel’s cleaner rerun. Three accelerators from the north pool were held for the next execution window. The notice explains that the reservation was meant to support the approved retry rather than the noisy first pass. A margin comment says Project Aurora had a separate request, but it did not affect Citadel’s slot. The final line says the reserved window should be used for the rerun and then logged for review.


Change Request - 2026-06-07

This change request updates the Delta Horizon review after the calibration trial. It says the team kept the stable Mira-3B path and discarded the memory-limited attempt. The request also asks for the alias to be written consistently as Delta Horizon in future notes. A short justification says the rejected run could not support the final review. The approval line points readers back to the experiment log for the original comparison.


Change Request - 2026-05-14

This change request recorded the revision for Project Ypsilon Echo after the first pass looked too narrow. The team replaced the earlier sparse lookup path with evidence pooling for the main rerun. One reviewer warned that a pruning-only option might hide useful context, so it was left out of the final plan. The memo said the updated path should be used for the next evaluation cycle and for the report that followed. A separate note mentioned that a different project was still testing a reranking setup, which should not be confused with this one.


Experiment Log - 2026-05-13

The Bellwether trial run used the broader fallback path and completed without the audit problems seen in the narrow filter path. The log says the narrow path was tested first but produced an inconsistent review trail. A small resource note records that the run shared compute with another team, though the shared work did not drive the result. The entry also mentions that the trial was not meant to settle the final policy by itself. Instead, the team planned to carry the broader path into the summary memo if the follow-up stayed clean.