Email Thread - 2026-07-09

The email thread discusses why the corrected path stayed active for Onyx Orchard. Jalen Reef said the earlier pass was useful for debugging but should not be cited in the final write-up. Nadia Holt replied that the rerun had cleaner evidence, so the team should keep that version. The thread also mentions a spare review branch for Project Galena Orchard, but it was unrelated. By the end of the thread, the corrected result was the only one left in circulation.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-15

The weekly report said the narrower pass survived review and became the final standard for Onyx Grove. It added that the broader draft remained archived because it had blurred the comparison. The report counted the review slots and confirmed that the extra backup slot was unused. The team noted that the final standard matched the cleaner interpretation from the change request. The wrap-up ended with the Grove story marked complete.


Review Memo - 2026-06-09

This memo reviews the first comparison for Project Ultraviolet Echo. The team weighed a voting approach against a pooling approach for the claim screen. The memo says the pooling path looked cleaner in the notes, but the test evidence was still incomplete. A sidebar mentions that another project with a similar nickname had already moved on to a different plan. The reviewer asked for a formal change request before anything was locked in.


Review Memo - 2026-07-10

The review memo said the tighter routing plan had replaced the broad search path. It explained that the older idea was left out because it did not fit the current toolchain. The memo also noted that the decision came after the change request had been discussed in full. A short aside referenced Ultraviolet, but only as a separate project example. The memo ended by saying the team would rerun the check under the tighter plan.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-04

The notice confirms that Bellwether received a small GPU pool for the rerun window. The first attempt failed because the validation set was incomplete, so the team postponed the main comparison. Asterion is mentioned in the margin as an unrelated example of a successful rerun. Lila Voss kept the correction list organized after the failed attempt. The note ends by asking for a revised pass with the complete inputs.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-13

This notice records the compute reservation for Lattice Summit after the calibration run. Node Cedar-02 was allocated to the summit team for the follow-up window. The notice says the reservation supported the stable run rather than the drifted attempt. A brief line mentions that the earlier failure should not be used to judge the final status. The allocation remained available through the follow-up period.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-10

These minutes capture the Project Quartzite Meadow discussion about the next verification pass. The group first considered a faster route, but it was dropped once the test notes showed the output had slipped. They kept the steadier rerun because it preserved the comparison trail the reviewers wanted. Mina Solis summarized the action items and said the Meadow alias should stay attached to this workstream. The meeting ended with agreement to review the steadier path again after the resource check.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-05-18

The session began with a quick check of active workstreams and the latest calibration setup for Project Asterion. Mina Vale was listed as the lead coordinating the Asterion follow-up list. The team first considered Lumen-8B for calibration, but that option was left open pending rerun results. Project Halcyon was mentioned only as a side note because its evidence pass was being tracked separately. By the end of the meeting, the group agreed to wait for the rerun before locking the review standard.


Experiment Log - 2026-06-18

This log tracks the retry set for Project Asterion and a few nearby side note runs from the same lab week. The first Asterion pass on the retrieval stack stalled with an out-of-memory failure before any score could be recorded. A later rerun under the same project name used the alias-expansion path and finished cleanly on the validation slice. The team also noted that Project Bellwether had tried a similar filter-heavy setup, but that line was not part of the final Asterion plan. For the retry set, the engineers kept the older filtering route in the notes only as a comparison point. The log closes by saying the rerun was the one they intended to carry into review.


Incident Report - 2026-06-10

This incident report describes Xeric Echo's first evaluation pass and why the team paused before the review meeting. The original run on the Willow machine ended with an unstable-validation warning, so the output was not accepted. Talia Reed was listed as the review owner, and the notes say she was the one keeping the follow-up thread organized. The report warns that a similar project had a clean result on another node, but that outcome did not apply here. The team decided to wait for a rerun before making any public summary.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-11

The kickoff for Project Ypsilon Beacon opened with a reminder that the team wanted a cleaner evidence pass before the next review. Mina Kaur said the first rerun had stalled after a missing index was discovered in the retrieval layer. After that, the group agreed to keep the revised path and drop the earlier query-heavy variant. A side note mentioned that Project Zircon Beacon was still using a different validation checklist, so its results could not be compared directly. The meeting ended with a request to confirm whether Beacon should stay on the revised path or revert to the older one.


Weekly Report - 2026-05-18

The weekly report for Tern Kernel says the team began with a small compute budget and a narrow validation set. A note in the report says the first attempt leaned on sentence pruning, but that route was only a draft. The current plan shifted toward hybrid retrieval because it gave steadier coverage across the review slices. The same report mentions that a rerun was requested after the draft path looked unstable. The team expected the rerun to settle the question before the handoff.


Incident Report - 2026-07-09

The follow-up report explained that the heavier filter had caused the earlier confusion. After the rerun, the team could see the missing context more clearly and decided the lighter path should govern the next review. Rafael Stone marked the corrected path as the one to trust because it matched the incident evidence. The report also noted that the older path might still be useful as a backup for future comparisons. A side remark about Anchor was included only as a historical caution, not as a current recommendation. The team ended the follow-up with no open dispute about which path had authority.


Review Memo - 2026-07-01

The review memo says Borealis Kernel is now using the revised retrieval path as the standard. Borealis Harbor is named again as the person keeping the follow-up notes straight. The memo explains that the checkpoint mismatch from the earlier attempt was the reason the first run was rejected. It also says the rerun cleared the evidence check and gave the team a stable final result. The last paragraph points out that the failed trial on Juniper Lane is now only a cautionary example.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-10

This notice records the cache support reserved for Fenwick Matrix. One portion was assigned to the slower pass after the rerun changed direction. The faster setting received no extra support because it had not been approved. The notice ties the allocation to the stable rerun rather than the failed attempt. Nothing in the notice suggests the rejected option became the final plan.


Weekly Report - 2026-05-15

This weekly report records the current status for Project Willow after the schedule review. The final milestone timing stayed with the later window rather than the earlier draft. The report says the team avoided another reshuffle because the validation queue was already full. One brief mention of Project Quasar appears only as a comparison for reporting cadence. The closing line says the project is ready to proceed under the revised plan.


Email Thread - 2026-05-22

The email thread tracked the follow-up list after the rerun review for Borealis Nimbus. Mina Cho asked who should keep the notes organized once the clean pass was accepted. Ravi Holt replied that he would keep the follow-up list tidy through the next check-in. He also mentioned that the earlier diagnostic run would not be used for reporting, even though it helped explain the failure. A separate message in the thread confirmed that the Borealis alias remained the local shorthand for the project.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-22

The weekly report for Project Zircon Matrix says the narrow path finished within limits on the rerun. Nina Shore noted that the broader pass still consumed more capacity even though it was kept on file for comparison. The report adds that the accepted path needed one less support slot than the old setup. A short note on Project Halcyon appears in the margin, but it was unrelated to the matrix decision. The final status says the narrow path is now the standard for Zircon Matrix.


Experiment Log - 2026-06-26

This log captures the Parallax Beacon rerun and the cleanup that followed the first attempt. The opening pass stumbled after the validation signal drifted, so the team set that path aside. For the second pass, Parallax Beacon kept the retrieval stack but switched to a steadier calibration setup. The rerun was watched by Mina Vale, who noted that the later output matched the review target more closely. A separate side test using a narrower filter was judged too brittle and was not promoted. By the end of the log, the rerun was treated as the working reference for the rest of the week.


Review Memo - 2026-06-08

The final review for Citadel said the invalid first score should stay out of the record. It confirmed that the revised protocol, not the old path, was the accepted standard after the failed pass. The memo also noted that the missing bundle explained why the rerun could not be trusted. A brief comparison with Bellwether was included only to show that another project was still in review. The closing line stated that Citadel was ready to proceed with the revised protocol on the next cycle.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-23

Borealis Grove entered the week with the alias-expanded path still in place and the earlier literal path no longer under consideration. The report says the accepted rerun had already replaced the shaky fallback, so the team was now checking coverage rather than rebuilding the pipeline. Mara Venn asked for one more pass over the evidence list because a few references still pointed to the wrong internal shorthand. A brief mention of a different project's reranking success was included only as a distraction and did not alter Borealis Grove's status. The note says the Grove work was close to review-ready, but the final approval had not yet been recorded. No new ownership change was announced in this status update.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-11

These minutes capture the kickoff for Project Asterion, where the group framed the rerun as a chance to recover from an earlier flaky pass. The first attempt on the Cedar set stalled because the retrieval pool was too narrow, so the team agreed to widen the candidate pool before trying again. For the second pass, they kept the alias-driven shortlist but dropped the older chunking path that had been making the outputs noisy. Asterion was also told to keep one backup slot open for the rerun window in case the validation queue slipped. By the end of the discussion, the rerun was treated as the main path, while the earlier configuration was kept only as a fallback reference.


Change Request - 2026-05-22

The change request for Delta Cobalt asked to swap the retry to a lighter validation path. It explained that the earlier run had been rejected because the cache mismatch kept returning noisy results. The request argued that the simpler path would make the review easier to trust. A note from Soren Vale said the retry should stay local to Project Delta Cobalt and not inherit settings from the neighboring effort. The request did not record a completed outcome, only the proposed correction.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-11

The meeting opened with a handoff discussion for Project Citadel and a reminder that the follow-up list needed a new keeper. Elena Voss was named in the notes as the person organizing the Citadel follow-up items. The team considered a return to query rewriting, but that idea stayed provisional. Project Onyx came up as a nearby effort with a similar review format but a different checklist. The group agreed to wait for the review memo before treating any of the provisional ideas as final.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-18

The session for Project Verdant Iris opened with a check on the alias cleanup plan and the follow-up list. Mara Ilyas said the team would keep the older Verdant route only as a fallback while they reviewed the Iris naming pass. A short test with the fallback path produced uneven recall, so the group marked it as provisional rather than final. The notes also mention Project Bellwether in passing because its glossary review was used as a comparison point. By the end, the group agreed that the alias expansion draft needed one more pass before it could be treated as the standard.


Incident Report - 2026-06-23

The incident report says the Kelpie Nimbus rerun drifted after validation became unstable. Ravi Seng traced the drift to a stale queue entry that had not been cleared before the rerun. The report states that the stable baseline remained the reference point because the aggressive path had been ruled out. It also notes that a different experiment in the lab used a similar setup but produced a separate failure mode. By the close of the incident review, the team had kept the safer setting and shelved the noisy alternative.


Weekly Report - 2026-07-07

The weekly report says Onyx Iris ended the week with the backup check as the accepted reference. It also states that the 2-unit reserve and the 3-unit reserve were both still active for the same cycle. The report notes that the rejected earlier path stayed archived for comparison only. A closing sentence says the team did not need another correction before the next review. The report mentions a different project's larger reserve as a comparison point, but not as part of the total.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-04-12

These minutes capture the cause review for Xeric Falcon after the failure report. Priya Sen said the missing index was the immediate cause, but the bigger lesson was to keep the validated baseline separate from the broken attempt. The group agreed that the failed attempt could still explain the slowdown, yet it could not serve as the final reference. A side discussion about another project's calibration stack was logged and then ignored. The minutes end with a note to rerun the Falcon path only once the repair is complete. No alternate failure reason was accepted.


Email Thread - 2026-06-10

In the email thread, the lead says Ravel Matrix will use the evidence-pooling path for the final review. The same message confirms the voting draft is only an older alternative and should not be treated as current. One reply mentions that Project Zircon is still waiting on its own sign-off. Another reply says the current review notes should carry forward unchanged into the final meeting. The thread ends with agreement that the archived draft stays archived. Nobody raises a new concern about the live plan.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-14

This weekly report covers Fenwick Echo's closeout after the corrective rerun. The team notes that two GPUs remained available for the final validation window. One machine was held back for a backup comparison, while the main rerun used the other allocation. The report says the approval went through after the cleaner rerun matched the expected state. The final line states that no further corrective action was needed.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-28

The meeting minutes say Cascade Kernel kept the rerun because the first trial did not hold up. Cascade Meadow was again the point person for the review notes. Cedar Row is mentioned only as the invalid path that failed the filter check. The minutes also say the revised evidence pass was the one that matched the team's expectations. A small action item asks for one more read-through before the memo goes out. The earlier draft summary is marked as superseded.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-12

The check-in opened with a recap of the Jacaranda Archive retrieval queue and the people keeping it tidy. Mina Adler was named the retrieval owner for the Archive, and the note said that the handoff would keep follow-up items organized. The team first considered a sparse alias pass, but that route was set aside after a quick dry run looked too brittle. A second pass using a denser retrieval stack was kept as the working plan for the next review. The group also flagged a separate analysis lane for later, so the two efforts would not be confused.


Change Request - 2026-06-14

The change request recorded the switch from the provisional draft to the revised kernel route. It said the revised path cut the review time and removed the unstable branch. Ravi noted that the discarded option should remain in the archive only. The request also stated that the revised pass was the one approved for the next review. A final line confirmed that no further alias expansion would be used in this workstream.


Experiment Log - 2026-06-21

This log records the Onyx Summit run and the checks made after the first pass. The earlier attempt failed because the validation signal drifted during the run. A later rerun used the cleaner setup and produced the result the team wanted to keep. The log also mentions a neighboring benchmark that was noisy for unrelated reasons. Only the rerun is treated as the useful reference for the Summit summary.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-05-11

These minutes record the Cascade Horizon review meeting and the method discussion that followed. The team compared the older temporal filtering path with alias expansion for the same review cycle. After hearing the test results, they favored alias expansion and treated the prior path as the baseline only. A side comment mentioned that the calibration notes still referenced a separate project, which was not part of this decision. The meeting ended with a request to prepare a concise memo before the next check-in.


Review Memo - 2026-06-14

The Lattice Beacon review memo opened with a check on the main evaluation path. The reviewers said the clean study used cross-encoder reranking and kept a reward model in place. A second study on a nearby project was mentioned only as a contrast and was not the basis for the Beacon decision. The memo also pointed to an earlier draft that still needed correction. Evan Holt collected the notes for the final review.


Change Request - 2026-06-28

This change request covers the final cleanup for Quartzite Beacon. It says the team kept the cleaner retrieval path and dropped the noisy trial from active use. The request also notes that the archived draft stayed in place for audit purposes. No new ownership change was introduced, and the follow-up list remained with Rina Holt. The sign-off line states that the final cleanup matched the review discussion.


Review Memo - 2026-06-05

This memo reviews the corrected Aegis rerun and the decision made after the fix. Leah Ortiz wrote that the corrected pass should be treated as the reference result, not the noisy draft. The memo notes that the team kept the local alias list for Aegis, but dropped the older shortcut that had caused confusion. It also says the final review accepted the rerun because the evidence matched the revised filter and the follow-up notes. A passing mention to Saffron appears only as a contrast, since its earlier method switch was unrelated to this review.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-07

The weekly report said the corrected checklist remained the active guide for Falcon. It also repeated that the first path was not used in the final review. The clean rerun was described as the basis for the closing summary. A brief note mentioned a temporary GPU reserve for another team, but that reserve was released before the week ended. The packet owner was still not listed when the report went out.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-13

This weekly report summarizes the Bellwether Delta rerun and the review outcome. The smaller setup completed cleanly and replaced the earlier heavy plan as the working standard. The report notes that the larger option was not used in the final review because it had been set aside. Nadia Vale kept the Bellwether Harbor references in the closing notes so the handoff stayed readable. The team ended the week with the rerun approved and no further changes pending.


Change Request - 2026-06-24

The change request opens with Project Xeric Nimbus, which the team nicknamed Xeric Dune in the draft notes. It says the original plan was too tight for the verification window. The request therefore moved the review checkpoint to give the rerun more breathing room. A separate note mentions Project Asterion, but that item belongs to another queue. The writer says the revised checkpoint should be used for the rest of the project.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-14

Verdant Foundry finished the week with the revised rerun in place and the follow-up queue nearly cleared. The team kept the corrected routing and did not return to the unstable branch. Mira Sol noted that the remaining checks were routine and did not need escalation. The archive still contains the early Harbor draft, but it is no longer treated as current guidance. The next review will focus on cleanup rather than another rerun.


Change Request - 2026-06-20

The change request asked for a correction to the evidence sweep after the earlier pass missed a key citation. Jonah Reed said the team should stop treating the broad rerun as authoritative because it had been built from stale notes. Instead, the revision would rely on the compact review path that matched the latest discussion. Asterion Harbor remained the local name in the margin comments, while the main project label stayed unchanged. The request also warned that a separate retrieval lane from another project should not be mixed into this workstream. The final signoff was held until the corrected pass could be checked again.


Weekly Report - 2026-05-08

The weekly report says Peregrine Harbor now has a stable follow-up owner and fewer loose ends. It names Iris Vale as the person still keeping the Harbor Thread organized. The report also says the earlier alternate assignment was no longer active. A short note about a separate calibration lane was left in the appendix, but it was not part of the main status. The team expected the next review to focus on whether the same thread name could carry the remaining questions to closure.


Incident Report - 2026-06-04

This report describes the first attempt for Project Asterion Nimbus and why it had to be stopped. The initial run on the Rowan node collapsed after a checkpoint mismatch surfaced during evaluation. The failure was traced to a stale artifact, not to the later rerun used by Asterion Harbor. A brief note compared the issue with a separate project that had a validation problem, but that comparison was not relevant to the Asterion case. The report recommends treating the rerun as the authoritative result once the stale file is replaced.


Review Memo - 2026-05-03

This memo reviews the Ultraviolet Cobalt method check and the competing options. The team compared a narrow alias-based path with a broader retrieval path for the same project. The narrow path was dropped after the review because it depended on a stale mapping table. The broader path became the working standard for the next round. The memo also mentions a separate study in passing, but that study was not part of the project decision.


Review Memo - 2026-06-22

This memo explains the final status for the Halcyon Grove rerun. The rejected comparison path is named only to show why the team changed course. The accepted rerun is the one that the reviewers used for the closeout. A short note says the Grove label should stay attached to the new path in later updates. Nothing in the memo reopens the older choice.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-25

The meeting minutes describe an early draft review for Citadel Matrix that did not survive the first discussion. Citadel Spire is the local alias used for the main branch in the notes. A side experiment on North Gate was mentioned only to keep the comparison honest. The draft path was rejected after the team noticed a mismatch in the supporting evidence. The minutes say the corrected review should replace the earlier draft for the next round. The chair asked that the abandoned idea not be carried into the final memo.


Weekly Report - 2026-05-21

Asterion’s weekly update said the project had recovered enough to continue with the revised plan. The note confirmed that a small pool of compute remained reserved for the rerun window. It also mentioned that the earlier fallback path stayed archived for reference only. Lena Hart kept the coordination log current while the team waited for the next review. The report ended by saying the revised approach was now the working baseline for the project.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-09

This notice said Bellwether would receive a modest compute reservation for the last pass. The amount was smaller than the earlier estimate because the team had already filtered out the dead-end draft. A spare worker was kept on standby in case the validation step needed a retry. The note warned readers not to count the unrelated Citadel draft as part of the active reservation. No staffing changes were attached to this notice.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-08

Bellwether entered the week with a review package that needed one more cleanup before signoff. The team kept a narrow evaluation path for the final check and avoided the older draft that had drifted away from the target scope. Sana Qureshi was asked to keep the evidence notes aligned with the revised outline. A brief aside compared the package with an unrelated Citadel draft, but that side note was not part of the Bellwether review. The report closed by saying the revised package was ready for a last pass once the compute slot opened.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-14

The weekly report said Tern Delta had finished the clean rerun and moved into review. It summarized the final method as the one that survived the comparison with the failed trial. The report also said the project had only a small resource draw during the accepted run. A closing note mentioned that the earlier trial was now treated as a discarded reference point. The last sentence stated that the project was ready for sign-off after the comparison was settled.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-05-04

These minutes recap the kickoff discussion for Project Asterion and the follow-up items from the first planning round. The team first leaned on the Aurora alias for a retrieval pass, but that label was kept local to the same workstream and never used outside the project. Priya Moss was noted as the person keeping the evidence queue organized after the handoff. The group agreed to try a rerun after the opening pass felt too noisy for review. A later check showed the rerun was the one the team kept, while the earlier pass was treated as a discarded trial. The minutes also mention a small side discussion about a different project nickname, but it was only background context and did not affect Asterion's plan.


Review Memo - 2026-06-30

The follow-up memo says the Harbor team is keeping the lighter option for the next pass. It points back to the earlier incident as the reason the heavy setup was dropped. The memo notes that the successful pass from the weekly report is still the best reference for the current review. A short sidebar mentions that the unrelated method change from another project should not be treated as precedent. The final sentence asks for a confirmation note after the rerun is complete.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-23

The final check-in for Xeric Horizon opened with a recap of the rerun and the older option that had been dropped. The team agreed that the dropped option had been useful only as a comparison point. Jonah Reed summarized the evidence table after the discussion. A small detour into a different scoring scheme was recorded but did not affect the decision. The minutes closed by asking for one last confirmation before the status note went out.


Review Memo - 2026-05-09

The review memo for Verdant Beacon closed the loop on the rerun and compared the corrected result with the earlier mismatch. It said the cleaned rerun was accepted after the team verified that the stale configuration had been removed. The memo also noted that the provisional schedule from the kickoff was no longer the reference point for the follow-up list. Instead, the final reconciliation used the corrected workflow as the standard for the rest of the week. A short closing note said the Beacon effort could move on to routine monitoring once the review sign-off was complete.


Review Memo - 2026-06-13

This memo reviews Project Parallax Grove after the rerun and explains why the team kept one path over the alternatives. The older setup was rejected because it inherited the earlier indexing failure. By contrast, the rerun produced the only result the reviewers considered stable enough to cite. A draft comparison also mentioned a different tuning style, but that option was treated as secondary once the rerun cleared review. The memo closes by saying the grove project should proceed with the rerun's settings as the operating standard. A short appendix lists the side test as interesting but not authoritative.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-24

The Monsoon Meadow team opened by reviewing the rerun plan and the reason the earlier pass had been dropped. They noted that the unstable-loss failure came from the first attempt and that the follow-up would keep the same data slice but adjust the scoring step. A brief comparison was made against a separate calibration effort in another project, but that side track was not adopted here. By the end of the discussion, the group agreed that the rerun should continue under the Monsoon Meadow label rather than switch to a different project line. The minutes also mention that the team wanted a short review note after the rerun so the final status would be easy to trace.


Experiment Log - 2026-06-22

This log tracks the retry sequence for Project Ravel Lagoon. The first pass ended badly when the validation signal became unstable, so the team did not keep that run. A later retry used the same evidence path but trimmed the calibration step. The log says the trimmed retry was the one the reviewers expected to see again. A passing mention of Project Quartzite Lagoon appears only as background and does not affect the retry outcome.


Weekly Report - 2026-05-27

Citadel’s weekly report confirmed that the review stayed with the broader path through the end of the cycle. The earlier dead end was kept out of the final checklist. The report also noted that the team had no open objections after the correction. Mara Finch maintained the status summary for the final handoff. The closing line said the project was ready for the next round of work.


Experiment Log - 2026-06-10

The experiment log for Lattice Cobalt recorded the rerun and the earlier failed pass side by side. The earlier pass was flagged because its evidence trail did not stay consistent. The rerun used the same inputs but a stricter gate, and that version held. A short note said the valid rerun should be used for the next memo. The log also mentioned a separate calibration thread for Project Aurora, which was unrelated. By the end of the log, the rerun was the only result treated as reliable.


Change Request - 2026-06-11

This change request records the Echelon Grove revision that followed the earlier incident. The draft initially pointed to rank fusion, but the revised request switched to teacher distillation after the rerun. The note explains that the new option aligned better with the corrected cache behavior seen in the incident report. A comparison line mentions a separate Project Fenwick Grove experiment, but only as background. The final approval kept the revised option and did not reopen the older draft. The request is explicitly framed as the follow-up to the earlier Echelon failure.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-20

The resource notice says Ravel Echo was granted a modest compute pool for the next pass. Nadia Cole tracked the allocation because the prior trial had already consumed most of the shared buffer. A larger reserve was discussed for a backup stream, but that reserve was never attached to the main run. The notice also mentions a separate maintenance job that used a different cluster and should not be mixed with Ravel Echo. By the close of the note, the team expected the smaller allocation to be enough for the rerun.


Experiment Log - 2026-06-05

This log tracks the Borealis Junction calibration sequence for the latest batch. The first pass on the harbor-side setup stalled after a checkpoint mismatch, so the team set it aside. A later rerun used a smaller encoder and completed cleanly on the same bench. The rerun also kept the retrieval stack in its leaner form instead of the older dense path. A brief note flagged that the moonlit backup lane was only for comparison and did not drive the final readout.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-18

These minutes cover the Asterion review session for the retrieval track. The team first considered a reranking path, but that option was set aside after the prototype review. By the end of the discussion, the group favored sentence pruning for the next pass. Asterion also kept a note that the rerun would use a cleaner evidence set. A small side discussion mentioned Project Nereid only as a comparison point, not as the active workstream.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-21

The Halcyon Summit notice reserved the review window for a rerun of the evidence checks. Asterion Harbor was mentioned in the staffing note as the person keeping the queue tidy for that window. The notice said the team would avoid the earlier broad retrieval path because it had produced too much noise. Instead, the rerun would use the narrower alias trail that had been discussed in the previous meeting. A separate allocation note referred to a different project and did not affect Halcyon Summit.


Review Memo - 2026-06-08

This memo records the final review for Jacaranda Beacon after the repaired rerun. The reviewers said the corrected path was now the standard for the project. They also noted that the earlier chunked draft remained archived only for reference. Mina Rao confirmed that the follow-up list stayed with the Beacon team through closure. A brief comparison to an unrelated archive test was included, but it was not part of the decision.


Review Memo - 2026-05-10

This final review summarizes Fenwick Delta after the rerun and resource check. The lighter search path stayed in place, and the broader sweep remained out of scope. Nadia Park still handled the reservation note, while the review asked for no further expansion. The memo also states that the rerun did not settle every open question. The team closed the episode with the tighter plan as the approved status.


Incident Report - 2026-06-08

This incident report covers the failed pass for Sycamore Iris and the follow-up actions taken after the error. The first attempt stalled because the evidence index was incomplete, which made the result unusable. After that failure, the team switched to the rerun and treated the earlier pass as invalid. A side note mentions that Project Quartzite had a separate logging issue, but that was unrelated to Sycamore Iris. By the end of the review, the rerun was the only run considered for the summary.


Email Thread - 2026-05-06

The follow-up thread for Ypsilon Junction said the rerun could proceed only after the evidence queue was trimmed. Jonah Reed noted that the earlier dense path was still archived for comparison, even though it was no longer the preferred route. He added that the leaner pass would be the reference for the review because it matched the new checklist. A second reply warned that a separate project had seen a false alarm in its own validation step, so the team should not copy that result. By the end of the thread, the group agreed to keep the final summary tied to the cleaner rerun and not the abandoned option.


Incident Report - 2026-06-09

The incident report for Ravel Junction describes an early attempt that failed during setup. The failure came from a checkpoint mismatch in the first pass. The report says the team paused before trying the replacement path. A brief line notes that another project’s rerun was unrelated to this incident. The writeup closes by saying the team would wait for the follow-up review before deciding anything.


Email Thread - 2026-06-21

The Bellwether thread starts with a request to verify whether the rerun would have enough compute for the next analysis pass. Jae Park replied that the first reservation was too small for the planned experiment and should not be treated as final. A later message says the team would borrow extra capacity from the shared pool if the rerun stayed on schedule. The thread also mentions a different project, Nightjar, only as a side example of a heavier workload. By the end of the exchange, Bellwether still needed a confirmed count before the rerun could begin.


Change Request - 2026-05-24

The change request records the final cleanup for Tern Kernel after the failed rerun. It confirms that hybrid retrieval stayed in place for the next cycle. The discarded pruning route is listed only as a fallback that never became official. The request also says the team would keep the smaller validation set for another pass. The closing remark describes the rerun as the final check, even though the backup had already finished.


Change Request - 2026-06-11

The change request opened with a note that Tern Delta was revising its evidence workflow after a shaky trial. An early path using rank fusion was discussed, but the team set it aside after the rerun performed more reliably. The minutes said the rerun became the preferred basis for the review because it handled the disputed cases more cleanly. A second project was mentioned only as a contrast, and it did not affect Tern Delta's decision. The group closed by asking for a short memo that would preserve the final choice.


Incident Report - 2026-06-28

This report records the rerun for Project Galena Horizon after the earlier attempt failed validation. The invalid attempt in Galena Harbor was traced to a missing manifest, which kept the results from being used. A corrected rerun completed later that day and produced the only numbers the reviewers were willing to keep. The operator noted that the rerun used the same review rubric but a cleaner packet of source files. One unrelated diagnostic for a neighboring sandbox also failed, but it was not part of the project decision. The incident closed with a reminder that the accepted rerun should be treated as the authoritative outcome.


Experiment Log - 2026-06-21

The experiment log recorded the rerun for Project Halcyon Meadow. The earlier trial had been marked invalid after the storage mismatch, so its numbers were not carried forward. The rerun finished normally and produced the result the team wanted to keep. The log also mentioned that the cleaner slot from the notice was the one used for the second attempt. One appendix compared the Meadow run with another project's noisy trial, but that comparison was only for context. The final remark said the rerun should be treated as the authoritative record.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-27

This weekly report tracks the current state of Zircon Delta after the correction. The invalid Juniper pass is named only to explain why the team switched to the rerun. The comparison now uses the rerun and ignores the failed attempt. A small resource note says the review only needed one GPU for the clean pass. The report says the local review thread will stay with Zircon Delta until the final signoff. No new obstacle is listed, but the memo implies the old path will not return.


Review Memo - 2026-06-19

This memo gives the final readout for Lattice Summit after the reservation window. The stable run was treated as the accepted reference because the other attempt had drifted. The memo also says the summit review stayed aligned with the later reservation note. A side note about a different portfolio item was added for context only. The final readout closed the loop on the calibration discussion.


Resource Notice - 2026-07-12

This notice confirms a tight archive allocation for Citadel’s rerun. The space was trimmed because the larger cache had already been ruled out in the weekly report. Tara Finch asked for the leaner setup so the rerun could finish without borrowing extra storage. A passing Aurora reference in the notes was unrelated to the Citadel allocation. The notice says the reservation should cover the focused pass only. That left the team dependent on the smaller plan described earlier.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-07

This weekly report gives the Nightjar Archive status after the review prep and ownership update. The schedule note says the earlier date was replaced with a nearer target after the verification pass. Node Cedar-02 was set aside for the archive effort with two GPUs available for the next stage. The report repeats that the cleaner run, not the failed one, was the standard for the team’s next check. A brief footer says the archive work stayed separate from the Saffron comparison thread.


Incident Report - 2026-06-22

This incident report describes the Citadel rerun and the issue that interrupted the first check. The team found that the original alias expansion plan was too brittle for the incoming documents. Rhea suggested a cleaner evidence pooling path, and Omar captured the correction in the notes. A stray mention of Project Ypsilon was included only as a benchmark from another group. The report said the rerun could proceed once the brittle step was removed. By the end, the team expected the revised path to become the reference for Citadel.


Incident Report - 2026-04-26

This incident note covers the first Orchard rerun and why the team paused it. The run on Mira-8B collapsed with a missing-index failure, so the result was marked invalid. The engineers said the failure came from a stale path rather than from the stewarding change. After that, the team set the Mira attempt aside and prepared a cleaner rerun. The note also mentioned a second system in passing, but it had no role in the Orchard outcome.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-08

The Asterion group opened by noting that the rerun would focus on evidence retrieval quality rather than the broader scoring stack. A draft plan still mentioned Anchor as a possible fallback, but the team treated that as background and kept it local to the older path. By the end of the discussion, the group preferred the route that kept the retrieval notes compact and easier to audit. One reviewer pointed out that the first attempt had drifted because a calibration step was added too early. The minutes closed with a reminder that the rerun should preserve the cleaner comparison set for the next review.


Incident Report - 2026-06-20

This incident report covers the failed Wildfire Summit run and the checks that followed. The first attempt stalled on a missing index, which blocked the evidence pass before scoring could finish. A backup run was started afterward, but it was only used for comparison and not for the final review. The note also says that Rina Holt stayed the reviewer for the incident write-up. A separate sandbox check used a different package and did not affect the main outcome.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-05-24

The Jacaranda Orchard review opened by comparing the failed first pass with the cleaner rerun. Mina Vale said the rerun should guide the next summary because it matched the intended retrieval behavior. Jalen Ors noted that the older path still appeared in the notes, but only as a rejected option. The group agreed to keep the orchard alias local to this project and not borrow labels from other workstreams. The minutes close with a reminder that the follow-up list should use the rerun as the authority.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-11

The notice confirms that Bellwether received the extra compute needed for the validation rerun. It explains that the rerun was kept small so the team could preserve capacity for the main review. A separate line says the earlier Meridian reference should not be treated as an active assignment. The allocation was described as temporary and tied to the rerun window only. After the rerun, the team planned to return the spare capacity to the shared pool.


Review Memo - 2026-06-26

This memo confirms that Project Asterion kept the cleaned rerun as the only valid reference for the review. The earlier fallback was mentioned again, but only as a discarded comparison point. Mina Roy said the team should cite the rerun instead of the failed attempt when summarizing the episode. The memo also notes that Project Bellwether faced a different packaging issue and was not part of this decision. Asterion’s final status was described as ready for a fresh report once the rerun output was archived.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-05-11

These minutes capture the first planning pass for Project Aegis and a few nearby distractions from other teams. Mara Ilyas said the group would start with a retrieval-heavy path for Aegis, while Project Briar was only mentioned as a comparison point. The team also noted that the old Anchor-style shortcut was not a fit for this workstream. By the end of the discussion, the draft checklist for the rerun was left with the Aegis owners. A separate note mentioned that Project Quasar was preparing a different benchmark and should not be mixed into this plan.


Weekly Report - 2026-05-16

The weekly report said the Bellwether rerun followed the newer path and did not reuse the discarded draft. It described the rerun as steady enough to keep the review moving. Priya Vale was listed as the contact for checking the final writeup, not as the person making the method call. The report closed by saying the current approach remained the reranking one. The older threshold path was kept only for historical reference.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-15

At the final Equinox Harbor meeting, the team agreed the cleaner check was the version to carry forward. They also counted two supporting notes: the reserved test lane and the short follow-up list. Mira said the only remaining concern was the edge case mentioned in the weekly report. Arun closed by saying the project was stable enough for the next cycle, even without a full replacement plan. The older noisy pass stayed in the file as background only.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-22

These minutes capture the early planning for Ypsilon Delta and the rerun the team wanted to protect. The group first considered a calibration pass tied to the Willow lane, but that option was kept tentative. A follow-up note said the earlier trial on the Rowan machine had been noisy and should not be treated as final. For the next review, the team wanted the Delta alias kept local so the handoff would stay easy to trace. One speaker asked whether the resource note from the neighboring project could be reused, but the chair said it should not drive this plan.


Resource Notice - 2026-07-06

The resource notice for Project Zircon Foundry summarizes the final allocation for the review cycle. The valid calibration path used two shared compute blocks, while the rejected draft used one more block before it was stopped. That final allocation was recorded after the cleaner retrieval lane was confirmed. The note says the archived Zircon Harbor label should not be reused outside this project. The notice closes by stating that the final review stayed within the planned budget.


Incident Report - 2026-06-10

The incident report explains that the first Tern Orchard attempt failed because the lookup path was incomplete. That failure pushed the team toward a rerun rather than another calibration pass. Jae Patel wrote that the rerun should keep the same data slice but change the retrieval order. The report also mentions a harmless warning from a different project, which was not part of the orchard incident. By the end, the team had not yet declared the final status.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-16

The check-in opened with a recap of the Monsoon Lagoon review track and a note that the first pass still looked shaky. Rina Vale said the lagoon team would keep the dense lookup path only as a fallback while the main run was being reworked. By the end of the discussion, the group agreed that the rerun should rely on structured prompts rather than the earlier chain-based setup. A side note mentioned that Project Aurora was also testing a similar fallback, but its schedule was not tied to Monsoon Lagoon. The minutes closed with a reminder that the final review would compare the rerun against the older pass and the calibration notes.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-05

This notice recorded a small allocation for Borealis Archive to support the corrected rerun. The notice specified one GPU for the follow-up work and tied it to the same archive discussed in the review. It also warned that an earlier reservation request had been withdrawn after the failed pass. The coordinator wrote that the extra resource was meant for the newer path, not for the abandoned shortcut. A closing line asked the team to keep the allocation limited until the rerun finished cleanly.


Change Request - 2026-06-19

The change request proposed a cleaner rerun for Project Bellwether after the noisy pass. It said the earlier output was not acceptable because the broad sweep mixed in unrelated evidence. The revised run would keep the smaller slice and compare it only with the approved baseline. Project Echelon was mentioned as a nearby case, but its setup did not affect the Bellwether correction. The request closed by asking for one more review once the rerun finished.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-13

The weekly note for Tern Horizon said the revised plan was now the active one. It described the rerun as stable and better aligned with the project's evidence checks. The note also mentioned that the earlier placeholder path was retired after review. A short aside said the team kept a spare cache line for troubleshooting only. The report closed by saying the project was ready for a final comparison sweep.


Incident Report - 2026-06-30

This incident note records the failed warmup for Project Ypsilon Cobalt before the clean rerun. The early pass stalled because the cached artifacts were out of sync, which made the scores unusable. After the fix, the rerun completed normally and the team kept the corrected ranking path. The note also mentions that a separate project had a checkpoint problem, but that issue did not affect Ypsilon Cobalt. The final comment says the rerun is the version to cite when summarizing the batch.


Incident Report - 2026-05-17

Citadel's first attempt stumbled after a checkpoint mismatch surfaced during the run. The report said the bad attempt was not the one that would be kept for review. Nina Quill wrote the incident summary and pointed to the rerun as the next step. A passing reference to Sonata appeared only as background noise from another program. The note made clear that the failure was tied to the old pass, not the planned rerun.


Experiment Log - 2026-06-18

The Citadel Junction experiment log began with an early trial that did not hold. Kestrel-7B was tied to that failed run, which the team linked to unstable validation behavior. A later note said the group would compare that failed pass against a cleaner rerun before closing the week. The log also mentioned a shared alias in passing, but it did not affect the experiment plan. The team wanted the final review to focus on the evidence trail rather than on the earlier misfire.


Review Memo - 2026-06-30

This memo recaps the Harbor evidence review and the related study outcomes. Granite Context Study 4 used dense retrieval and used a reward model. Nested Verifier Study 1 used calibrated voting and did not use a reward model. The memo said the Harbor team preferred the later chunked path over the older hybrid one. An unrelated note about structured prompting was included for completeness.


Incident Report - 2026-06-04

Project Bellwether’s rerun hit a resource wall when the job tried to share capacity with an unrelated validation task. Nina Holt wrote that the first attempt was invalid because the rerun borrowed resources that were reserved for a different check. The report says the team shut down the invalid pass and prepared a narrower retry for the same workstream. A brief comparison mentioned Project Quartzite, but only as background because its workload was not part of this failure. The incident ended with a request to verify the cleaner retry before the next review.


Review Memo - 2026-06-28

This memo collects review notes for the Galena Kernel workstream and its surrounding reranking checks. The review of Nested Verifier Study 3 said the team relied on rank fusion and did not bring in a reward model. For Project Galena Kernel, the group first considered confidence calibration, then settled on chain verification after the comparison. A separate note mentioned Project Nereid picking Nova-3B for reranking, but that path was kept as a side reference only. Another older entry for Project Aster described a switch from threshold search to reward reranking, which was not the standard adopted here.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-28

This notice tracks support for Asterion Horizon during the rerun window. Node Juniper-06 reserved two GPUs for the team before the follow-up pass. A separate allocation on a different node went to a different project and is not part of the rerun. The notice says the reserved capacity was intended for the cleaner pass rather than the failed attempt. By the end of the note, the support request is described as satisfied for the review cycle.


Email Thread - 2026-06-08

The email thread opens with the Ultraviolet Orchard team asking for a clean summary of the latest review. Evan Cho said the first pass had looked promising but was not ready to close. A reply pointed to an earlier note that had used a different retrieval style, but the team did not treat that note as final. The thread also mentions a separate project as background, which stayed outside the orchard discussion. By the end of the exchange, the group wanted one authoritative memo before any status was sent onward.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-22

This notice records support reserved for Bellwether Horizon before the rerun. Node Pine-07 set aside one GPU for the project. A different allocation in the same week went to another project and should not be counted here. The note says the reserved capacity was enough for the comparison pass and the follow-up check. It also says the support request was closed after the rerun finished.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-05-11

The kickoff for Ypsilon Echo focused on who would keep the follow-up list organized and how the early review would be tracked. Mara Vale was named to coordinate the workstream for Project Ypsilon Echo. The team also mentioned a short-lived idea to trim passages before scoring, but that path was only kept as a backup. For calibration, the group leaned toward a compact baseline rather than the larger option that had been discussed earlier. A note at the end said the next check would compare the rerun against the original review, not against the discarded shortcut.


Weekly Report - 2026-05-16

The weekly report for Project Yonder Harbor said the corrected rerun had finished cleanly. It also noted that only two comparison studies were kept in the final review, not three. That count matched the narrower pass and excluded the retired branch mentioned earlier. The report added that the Harbor summary now reflected the revised scope instead of the draft plan. A closing sentence said the team could reuse the same approach for the next Harbor check.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-04

This weekly report covers Project Ultraviolet Lagoon and the revision after the first method gave uneven results. The early plan relied on sentence pruning, but the team later switched to data mixing for the main pass. The report says the revised approach handled the evidence set more evenly than the earlier one. A note about a neighboring project using a separate cleanup script was included only as background. The final status says the revised approach stayed active for the next stage.


Incident Report - 2026-06-18

This note records the first rerun attempt for Project Caldera Harbor after the team noticed a problem in the retrieval pass. The earlier path used a compact reranker and looked promising, but the validation sweep drifted and the run was stopped. A follow-up check showed the same harbor set was still tied to the Caldera workstream, not the unrelated Saffron trial. The team kept the fallback indexing lane open while they prepared a cleaner rerun. No final sign-off was issued in this incident report, only a request to compare the rerun against the prior attempt.


Change Request - 2026-05-08

This change request records the method swap proposed for Wildfire Circuit after the first trial underperformed. The opening path leaned on a heavier adaptation step, but the trial notes showed it was too brittle for the full set. The request recommended a lighter retrieval-first procedure for the next round. A separate note mentioned a nearby pilot with a similar name, but it was not part of this project. The team asked for the swap because the later procedure was easier to audit.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-20

The follow-up discussion for Ultraviolet Horizon focused on whether the provisional path should appear in the final packet. The chair said the cleaned-up pass was the one that should stand. Another attendee asked for a last check on the archived notes before signoff. The group agreed that the provisional path would remain only as background context. The minutes did not record any new resource request.


Experiment Log - 2026-06-15

This log recorded the rerun for Project Lattice Junction after the earlier attempt had failed. The failure came from a checkpoint mismatch, while the rerun completed normally. The rerun used the distilled path and produced steadier evidence than the archived test path. The log noted that the discarded path should not be used when judging the final result. Talia North added a short note that the archive tag was updated after the clean pass. A stray mention of a different project’s resource notice appeared near the end, but it was unrelated.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-05-04

The Asterion group opened by aligning on a claim intake path and a backup review path in case the first pass stalled. Mina Vale kept the notes for the discussion, while the team agreed that the initial route would be treated as provisional. A quick comparison against a small validation set showed the first route drifting, so the group marked it as unsafe to keep running. They also mentioned a separate effort in Project Meridian as a cautionary example, but that workstream was not part of the Asterion plan. By the close of the meeting, the team preferred the backup review path and asked for a follow-up note after the rerun.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-12

This weekly report summarizes the Galena Kernel stabilization pass after the rerun. The team kept chain verification as the review standard and treated the earlier calibration idea as superseded. The rerun cleared the earlier memory issue, so the group moved on to a short documentation pass. A note in the margin said the review lane stayed separate from the Nereid reranking side task. By the end of the week, the project was considered ready for the next internal check.


Email Thread - 2026-06-13

In the Echelon thread, Ravi said the revised pass should replace the provisional draft. He added that the new route would stay local to the kernel and not borrow the older expansion trick. Nadia replied that the revised pass was the one to use for the review packet. A side comment noted that another team had kept its older path, but Echelon was not following that pattern. The thread ended with agreement that the revision would be the authority going forward.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-14

This weekly report covers Project Quartzite Grove's calibration cycle and the checks that followed. The team first tried a broad setup, but that attempt was dropped after the run became unstable. A later pass on the grove path held together and produced the result the team wanted to keep. The report says the group would use the later pass for the next round of comparison. A separate line mentions that another project in the same cluster had a different schedule and should not be mixed into the grove review. The final note says the calibration cycle was still on track after the correction.


Email Thread - 2026-05-24

The status email for Verdant Kernel announced that the follow-up review was ready to circulate. It said the rerun had enough reserved compute to finish without borrowing extra capacity. The message also mentioned that a small portion of the budget remained unused after the invalid pass was discarded. One reply asked whether the earlier noisy trial should be archived, and the answer was yes. Another reply noted that the cleaner rerun was the version to cite in later discussions. The thread closed by reminding readers that Verdant Kernel, not the neighboring track, owned the final summary.


Weekly Report - 2026-05-08

This weekly report summarizes the final status for Project Daffodil Summit after the rerun and review. Mina Vale kept the handoff notes current, and the team said her summary matched the corrected run. The summit used 4 GPUs across the rerun and the review pass together. A small warning noted that Project Echelon was preparing a different experiment log, so its numbers should not be mixed into Daffodil Summit's totals. The final review said the corrected result was the one to cite going forward. The report closed with the statement that the project was ready for archive.


Weekly Report - 2026-05-26

Jacaranda Orchard finished the week with the rerun accepted and the earlier failure archived. The report says the team kept the Orchard plan, not the abandoned Cedar path, as the basis for the next checkpoint. A brief note mentions that the review list now points to the clean rerun and the short meeting recap. One unrelated garden trial was mentioned in passing, but it did not affect the final status. By the end of the week, the orchard workstream was described as stable and ready for handoff.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-10

This weekly report summarizes the Borealis Falcon follow-up after the review memo. The team recorded that the cleaner pass was now the active baseline for Project Borealis Falcon. A small resource note said the rerun stayed within the planned budget and did not need extra allocation. The older noisy pass remained archived for reference, but it was no longer treated as the working path. The report closed by saying Borealis Falcon was ready for the next handoff.


Review Memo - 2026-06-06

The review memo says the cleaner evidence-pooling route produced steadier results than the failed rerun. It also notes that the hybrid option stayed on paper and was never promoted past discussion. For the final call, Asterion kept the simpler route and left the noisy path out of the next cycle. The memo references the earlier minutes so the reader can connect the rerun failure with the later review. A short sidebar mentions Saffron only as an older comparison point, not as an active branch of this project.


Review Memo - 2026-05-12

This review memo explains which Bellwether result was accepted after the rerun. The memo states that the stable trace from the lighter setup was the only valid outcome for reporting. It also says the failed pass should be ignored because the cache problem made its numbers unusable. Mina Holt added that the final summary should mention the reserved slot but not the abandoned heavy configuration. The memo ends with a note that the earlier Galena draft stayed out of the decision record.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-21

The closeout report says Ibis Nimbus finished the review cycle with the rerun as the accepted outcome. It also says the unstable first pass remained excluded from the final summary. The report confirms that the follow-up run used the reserved capacity from the earlier notice. One staffing question remained open, and the report did not name the person who would cover it. Overall, the project was marked complete and ready for archiving.


Incident Report - 2026-05-20

The incident report for Citadel Orchard described a failed pass that produced inconsistent retrieval notes. The team traced the issue to an outdated path that had been left in the draft. After that, the rerun was launched with the corrected path and the problem stopped repeating. The report said the rerun mattered because it showed the failure was tied to the earlier draft rather than the orchard plan itself. Mara Finch logged the correction and asked that the old path not be used in the final summary.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-12

Bellwether closed the week by tallying the reserve that remained after the rerun and cleanup planning. The report says the local allocation was enough for both the verification pass and the follow-on cleanup. Jules Hart kept the thread organized, and the summary repeated that the side experiment was not approved. A reference to Quartzite appeared only as a side example of a different project with a larger reserve. The final line says the team should count the reserve as committed to Bellwether’s rerun cycle.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-14

The weekly report says Cascade Matrix completed the rerun after the reserved compute slot opened. The rerun cleared the queue problem that had been described earlier in the incident report. The team marked the status as stable and moved on from the temporary reservation. A comparison line notes that the unrelated project was still waiting on its own reviewer. The report closes by saying the matrix work no longer needed another emergency slot.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-21

This resource notice covers the Lattice Matrix review window and the storage reserved for the revision pass. The north cabinet was set aside for the cleanup bundle, while the south shelf remained available for reference copies. A note warned that the older draft should stay archived because it no longer matched the current review plan. The notice also said the team would only keep one active bundle open at a time. The reserve label was updated after the meeting so the rerun materials would be easy to find.


Change Request - 2026-06-03

This change request records the Halcyon Kernel rerun setup and the reason the team changed direction. The request says the rerun should keep reward reranking because the calibration option had already been overtaken. A brief note adds that the rerun was meant to confirm the same direction before the review sign-off. The request also contrasts Halcyon Kernel with a separate Nereid reranking note that was not adopted here. By the end of the request, the rerun plan was approved for the next check.


Change Request - 2026-06-11

Delta Meadow filed a change request after the first draft missed the intended review window. The request asked to keep the compact summary format and drop the longer explanatory appendix. A note in the request said Talia Reed would coordinate the revision thread for the project. The same note warned that a more verbose variant had already confused reviewers on another team. The request did not commit to any final outcome yet. One side remark mentioned a different project's deadline shuffle, but that was only context.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-18

The Jacaranda Cobalt group opened with a quick recap of the retrieval check and the follow-up list. Mina Vale said the first pass for the project was noisy, so the team should keep the rerun as the reference point. An early trial using the older prompt path was set aside after the review flagged unstable evidence matching. The team agreed that the rerun, not the older path, would guide the next calibration notes for Project Jacaranda Cobalt. A side discussion mentioned a separate archive clean-up for Project Aurora, but that work was not part of the main agenda.


Email Thread - 2026-06-10

The Wildfire Archive thread opens with a note that the older plan had been too noisy for review. Leah Song replied that the team should keep the alias expansion idea because it matched the archive notes better. A backup proposal using a different reranker was mentioned, but it was treated as a side option. The same thread says the archive still needed a brief owner check before the next pass could start. No final decision was recorded in that first message chain.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-20

The meeting minutes describe the discussion for Project Lattice Horizon after the capacity notice. Nadia Cole argued that the earlier shortcut should be ignored because it came from the unstable branch. The team agreed to keep the alias cleanup step for the rerun and to compare it against the older scoring path only as a reference. One attendee asked whether the Harbor cluster could support the rerun, and the answer was yes. The minutes also mention that the branch with the shortcut should not be used in the final report. A final line says the follow-up note would confirm the closeout once the rerun finished.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-27

The weekly report says the Monsoon Matrix review closed with a cleaner evidence trail than the earlier attempt. It records a small resource pool for the rerun, with two accelerators kept aside for the last validation pass. The report credits the recovery to the fresh bundle and says the earlier mismatch was no longer blocking progress. A short comparison notes that the noisy segment remained weaker than the rest of the run, even after the fix. The closing line states that the team planned one more check only if the next review surfaced new drift.


Incident Report - 2026-05-05

The rerun for Ypsilon Archive started with the backup reranker but stalled on the first pass. After the stall, the operator switched to the alias-expansion path that the meeting had favored. That second run completed cleanly and produced the only acceptable result from the evening. A parallel test on a similar archive was mentioned in passing, but it belonged to a different workstream and was not used. The report closed by saying the rerun was kept because the earlier backup attempt did not finish.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-07

The weekly report closed the Tern Circuit rerun with a final status update. It stated that the main circuit and the backup slot together accounted for five GPUs. The canceled Sparrow branch was excluded from that tally. The report also said the rerun completed under the unchanged review checklist. A brief note added that the earlier incomplete sweep had been abandoned. No follow-up allocation was requested after the final pass.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-18

The Galena Falcon team opened with a check on the review queue and confirmed that the local alias Galena stayed in use for the project line. They first discussed a fallback run that had already been ruled out after a checkpoint mismatch. The group then agreed to keep the rerun focused on the same evidence set rather than widening scope. A small resource request was noted for the next pass, but the team postponed any extra allocation until the rerun proved stable. One attendee warned that a similar effort on another line had looked promising before failing late, so the minutes kept that as a cautionary example. By the end, the chair marked the rerun as the only path worth reviewing again.


Change Request - 2026-06-12

The note opens by framing Parallax Junction as a rerun after the first pass did not hold together. The earlier path used River-7B and was dropped after a checkpoint mismatch. For the retry, the team settled on Helix-3B as the working option. The message says that the change was meant to keep the classification track aligned with the rest of the review. A side comment mentions a different project’s calibration work, but that was not part of this rerun.


Review Memo - 2026-07-05

The final memo for Project Borealis Summit states that the clean rerun is now the reference point for review. It says the older baseline is kept only for audit context, since the team no longer trusts the first pass. Nina Sol emphasized that Borealis Summit should be described as stable, because the corrected output matched the requested calibration notes. The memo also records that the side comparison with Project Halcyon stayed out of scope for the sign-off. A short closing line says the project can move forward without another rerun unless the trace breaks again. The review packet was marked complete after the memo was circulated.


Change Request - 2026-07-02

The Nightjar Iris change request starts by listing the original ordering plan and the reason it was reconsidered. The early path produced a noisy ranking, so the team flagged it as the weaker choice. A second pass using a tighter filter gave the cleaner result and became the preferred option. The request also notes that a separate calibration stream for another project was still pending, which did not affect Nightjar Iris. The team asked for the cleaner result to be carried into the review memo.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-02

The Verdant Meadow team opened the week by flagging a short supply window for the retrieval lane. A note in the same notice said the first pass would keep the lighter setup on the bench unless the rerun needed more headroom. For that early pass, the team expected the shared node to cover only a single accelerator, not the larger burst that had been discussed in side comments. The notice also warned that the older fallback path should not be treated as the final choice for Verdant Meadow. Instead, the group asked readers to wait for the follow-up memo before assuming the plan was locked.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-14

By the end of the week, Project Ypsilon Meadow had settled on dense retrieval for the revised workflow. The final review treated the failed rerun as a lesson and kept the cleaner pass as the status reference. The report says the team reserved a small GPU pool for the next check and left the larger pool unused. Mara Ortiz and Eli Navarro both stayed on the follow-up list for the Meadow revision. The writeup closes by saying the workstream was stable enough for a final handoff.


Review Memo - 2026-06-24

This memo records the second look at Borealis Matrix after the first pass was retired. The review noted that the final trace set favored structured prompting and did not keep the earlier verification-heavy route. A side note compared the matrix work with a separate study that relied on calibrated voting and skipped any reward-model layer. That comparison was included only to show why the matrix team rejected the older assumption. By the end of the review, the follow-up list still pointed back to Iris Lane for unresolved checks.


Review Memo - 2026-06-12

This review memo summarizes the Bellwether rerun and the resource note. The reviewers say the successful pass depended on the smaller allocation described in the notice. They also state that the rejected fallback should not be used when citing the final outcome. Bellwether is described as stable enough for the next handoff, provided the lean setting is preserved. A brief aside mentions an unrelated Citadel draft, but it had no role in the decision. The memo closes by recommending the approved rerun over the failed first pass.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-10

The team opened the Asterion kickoff by framing the workstream around a compact retrieval-and-checking pipeline. They agreed that the initial alias for the effort would be Asterion, while Bellwether was kept as a local comparison name for notes only. A small compute pool was set aside for the first pass, with the expectation that the rerun could borrow more if the early attempt stalled. The minutes also mention that the draft review would focus on evidence coverage rather than raw speed. A short list of follow-up items was left for the next session, including whether the first pass should be kept or replaced.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-12

The review meeting for Nightjar Junction confirmed that the fuller allocation was now the working plan. The participants agreed that the earlier light setup had been too narrow for the rerun. Brianna Cole kept the action list moving and collected the follow-up notes. A brief aside mentioned that Project Ibis had its own resource discussion, but it did not affect this decision. The minutes closed with approval to proceed under the revised arrangement.


Review Memo - 2026-06-24

This memo reviews the Quartzite Cobalt retrieval path check and records the team’s preferred direction. The newer pooling route was described as the cleaner choice after the earlier sparse path had shown uneven behavior. A short aside mentions a calibration branch that was tested in parallel but never became the main route. The memo says the team wanted one more comparison before writing the final note. It also says the rerun would use the same evidence set as the first comparison.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-14

This weekly report closes out the Lattice Iris review cycle. The corrected run held steady through the last check and stayed ahead of the abandoned trial. The report says the final status was ready to share once the memo and meeting notes were aligned. An older draft had suggested one more rerun, but that idea was dropped after the status review. The team kept the archived failure only as a cautionary example.


Change Request - 2026-05-21

The change request said the older checklist was too noisy for the rerun and should be replaced with a tighter review path. Talia added that the first pass had surfaced too many irrelevant items, so the team wanted the cleaner path for the next review. The request also recorded that the fallback from another group was tested briefly but rejected as the main route. A short note at the end stated that the revised path would be treated as the working standard unless the follow-up review found a new issue. The document framed the change as a correction rather than a brand-new plan.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-23

The final review says Project Aurora Meadow completed the cleaner rerun without needing the larger reservation. It repeats that the older option remained only a reference point. Talia Reed signed off on the note after confirming the inventory stayed within the smaller reserve. The report closes by saying the Meadow workstream was ready to hand over. No further correction was listed for the Aurora line.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-08

The kickoff for Project Asterion centered on a first-pass retrieval plan and a narrow validation set. Mira Solis was asked to keep the review notes for the Asterion workstream. The team agreed to try a lightweight rerun before widening the search space. A side note mentioned Project Anchor as an older reference point, but it was not treated as the active track. By the end of the meeting, the group had flagged the rerun as the next decision point.


Weekly Report - 2026-05-08

This week the Ypsilon Archive team logged two completed checks and one discarded trial. The discarded trial used the backup reranker, while the accepted review used alias expansion. Mina confirmed the correction list was current and had not grown after the rerun. The report also mentioned a separate archive effort that had more compute reserved, but that was not part of Ypsilon. Overall, the archive status was marked stable and ready for the next handoff.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-03

The meeting opened with a check on Project Asterion Kernel and the retrieval cleanup plan. The team first considered a broad reranking route, but the discussion kept returning to the rerun because the earlier path had produced uneven evidence ordering. Mina Cho said Asterion Harbor should stay the local alias for the workstream in notes shared outside the group. A follow-up list was built around the rerun, with attention on which passages should be treated as authoritative. The group also flagged a separate storage task for a different project so the Asterion Kernel minutes would not drift into unrelated work. By the close, the team agreed to keep the revised retrieval approach under review through the next check-in.


Review Memo - 2026-06-20

The Citadel review memo said the revised pass met the new standard and replaced the earlier draft. Owen Marsh wrote that the older draft had been useful for discussion but could not serve as the final status. The memo also noted that the filtered approach stayed in place because it matched the tightened review request. A side remark pointed out that a Sonnet-style summary from another project was not used here. The closing line asked for one more check on the remaining open branch before the episode could be closed.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-28

This notice covers the support that kept Ravel Beacon's clean rerun moving. Luca Fen reserved a modest compute block for the rerun checks and the short review pass. The notice says the larger allocation was unnecessary once the fallback path proved stable. A backup slot stayed open in case the team needed another comparison. The support record closes by saying the rerun had become the final working line.


Review Memo - 2026-06-12

This memo closes the Ultraviolet Matrix review after the recovery allocation and rerun check. The memo says the blocked attempt did not produce a valid result, but the rerun was ready for inspection. Mina Torres remained the named contact for the follow-up review. The memo also says the earlier calibration sketch stayed unofficial because the final call depended on the corrected index handling. The closing line notes that the workstream was pending signoff rather than fully archived.


Review Memo - 2026-04-24

The review memo compared the rerun against the earlier draft and the unrelated Larkspur side experiment. It concluded that the corrected Orchard bundle was the one to rely on. The memo also said the earlier broad lookup was only a temporary fallback and should not be treated as final. Tessa Vale was thanked for keeping the evidence notes consistent across the revision. A margin note warned that Project Borealis had a similar naming pattern but a different archive. The reviewer asked for the final wording to reflect the corrected bundle rather than the draft.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-17

This notice confirms the corrected allocation for Project Bellwether after the rerun. The earlier tally was off because one slot had been double counted. After the correction, the project held four accelerator slots in total. A note warns that Project Citadel's reserve request should not be used as evidence for Bellwether because it belongs to another queue. The notice closes by saying the revised count is the only one that should be reported upward.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-09

This weekly report covers Project Asterion’s rerun plan and the follow-up checks around it. The first attempt on the Vela index set stalled after a memory spike, so the team set that path aside. For the retry, the group kept the same retrieval stack but tightened the prompt sequence and shortened the batch size. A note in the margin says the old path was still useful as a warning, not as the standard. The final paragraph says the rerun was expected to settle the open issue before the review meeting.


Review Memo - 2026-06-12

The review memo says Wildfire Meadow accepted the cleaner rerun and stopped treating the rough filter as the main lane. Reviewers pointed out that the earlier draft had been useful only as a temporary screen. The memo also recorded that the follow-up run finished with the smaller shared pool already in place. For the final note, the team agreed to keep the cleaner path because it matched the evidence better. The memo closed by saying the old draft should stay archived rather than revived.


Review Memo - 2026-06-16

The Quartzite memo says the draft standard looked promising but still needed a clearer comparison rule. It notes that the older option stayed in the appendix only as a reference point. The memo also warns that a quick win from an earlier test should not be mistaken for the final benchmark. Aster appears once in passing as a legacy label from another discussion, but it is not the focus here. The review asks for one more pass before the team locks the recommendation.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-07

These minutes cover the handoff discussion for Project Zircon Lagoon. The team first considered a threshold-based path, but the discussion moved toward a cleaner calibration route. Nadia Cole agreed to keep the follow-up list for the lagoon review, while the older draft plan stayed archived. The chair noted that the archived idea should not be used to summarize the final recommendation. A brief aside mentioned a separate project stream, but it was not part of the lagoon decision.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-18

This notice covers the resource plan for Project Zircon Summit before the rerun window opened. Two GPUs were held for the Summit rerun, while a third unit was already committed to a separate calibration task. The notice warns that the backup trial should not be counted with the rerun allocation. A small scratch job for another team was listed in the margin and was not part of the Summit total. The resource note ends by saying the rerun would proceed only with the reserved pair.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-16

The weekly status said the rerun had not started yet because the team was still waiting on the reserve check. The report confirmed that the older backup line was no longer part of the active plan. Lena Ortiz's action list stayed attached to the status note for the next handoff. A brief note said the newer alias route remained the preferred option once the check cleared. The update referred back to the same Cascade Beacon review rather than any separate project.


Resource Notice - 2026-06-03

The notice summarizes the compute plan for Project Bellwether Iris and the surrounding review queue. Talia Roan reserved a small pool for the main reranking pass, while a separate check called Bell Harbor was kept in reserve. The team expected the main pass to be the authoritative one if the reserve check stayed noisy. A late comment suggested trying a lighter variant, but that idea was marked as a backup only. The note also reminds readers that Bellwether Harbor is the local alias used in the project thread.


Incident Report - 2026-06-10

The Bellwether retry began with the reserved resources in place but stopped early when the cache layer could not be initialized. The report says the failure was first blamed on a missing input bundle. A later check showed the bundle was present, so that explanation was withdrawn. The team then pointed to the cache initialization problem as the actual blocker. Project Citadel appears in a sidebar as a separate case that did not share the same error path. The report closes by saying the retry itself was not a valid success.


Review Memo - 2026-06-08

The Halcyon Delta memo opens with a reminder that the team had been debating two competing review paths. An early hybrid route was discussed, but the memo says it did not survive the internal check. The review instead pointed toward evidence pooling as the path that could be defended. The memo also notes that a nearby project with a different alias was using a separate workflow and should not be mixed into this decision. One paragraph mentions that the correction came after a rerun exposed the weak spot in the first pass. The author asks readers to keep the final summary tied to the corrected route rather than the abandoned one.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-28

This weekly report gives the final status for Citadel after the rerun review. The accepted path remained evidence pooling, and the old sketch was no longer active. Rhea listed only wording cleanup and summary formatting as remaining tasks. Omar said the project could be handed off once those small edits were finished. A passing note about Project Delta was included as a comparison point, not a dependency. In the final status, Citadel was treated as stable.


Incident Report - 2026-06-03

The incident report for Project Ultraviolet Summit said the initial evidence pooling pass failed because the match set was too noisy. It added that the rerun should avoid the old pooling path and use the revised setup instead. Leah Stone was listed as the one who would keep the review packet aligned with the revision. A brief note mentioned that Project Quartzite had a similar problem but a different fix, so the comparison should stop there. The report closed without saying whether the revised setup had already passed.


Incident Report - 2026-06-04

The incident note records the failed Galena Cobalt pass and ties it to a stalled worker pool. That attempt never reached scoring, so the team could not treat it as a valid result. A short aside says the backup route was tested later, but it was only used after the team ruled out the broken path. The note also refers to the rerun by name and says it was expected to carry the review forward. By the end of the note, the earlier failure is described as a lesson rather than the basis for the final status.


Email Thread - 2026-06-14

In the follow-up thread, the Asterion group agreed that the rerun had settled the debate about the review path. One message points out that the failed attempt should be archived and not reused in the next cycle. Another reply says the cleaned-up retrieval flow now serves as the baseline for the project notes. The thread also mentions that a separate Project Sonata discussion was unrelated and should not be mixed into the handoff. A final note asks for the summary to be sent after Lina Park finishes the revised checks.


Experiment Log - 2026-06-19

The experiment log recorded that the first calibration pass failed because the index bundle was incomplete. The rerun used the corrected route and completed cleanly. A brief note said the team kept the corrected route because it matched the memo's guidance. Another line mentioned a test branch that was faster but was not allowed into the final packet. The log ended by pointing to the review memo for sign-off.


Email Thread - 2026-05-06

The thread opened with Mara Venn asking whether the rerun should keep the corrected Asterion label or preserve the older shorthand for traceability. A reply confirmed that the corrected alias would be used in the shared notes, because the shorthand had already caused confusion in the first review. One message said the rerun looked cleaner than the draft, but a stale comparison from the earlier pass still sat in the appendix. Another note warned that a mention of Project Meridian belonged to a different effort and should be ignored. By the end of the thread, the team kept the follow-up list attached to Asterion and marked the older label as obsolete. The sender also asked for a final check on the review memo before the weekly report went out.


Change Request - 2026-06-14

The Cascade Beacon request asked for a lighter setup after the first pass ran too close to the available capacity. Lena Ortiz proposed keeping the older dense search line as a backup while the newer alias route was checked again. The note said the backup line was only a temporary hedge, not the preferred direction. A side remark mentioned that Project Cascade Beacon was the local name used for Project Cascade in this episode. The request also asked for one more review before any rerun went live.


Review Memo - 2026-06-27

The review memo for Wildfire Lagoon compared the first evaluation pass with the final rerun. The initial pass relied on hybrid retrieval, but the final version used document chunking after the review team found the first setup too uneven. A note about Project Borealis appeared in the margin as background, yet it was not part of the Lagoon decision. The memo concluded that the rerun was the version the reviewers should treat as authoritative. One sentence also mentioned that the team wanted the same evidence trail preserved for the next audit.


Weekly Report - 2026-05-11

The Sycamore Circuit team opened the week by reviewing the rerun plan for the claim-ranking pipeline. An early path called the Cedar pass was kept only as a reference because its outputs stayed noisy. The later rerun on the circuit settled on query rewriting after the first draft had leaned on teacher distillation. That rerun also kept a reward model in the scoring stage, which the team treated as the final authority. A short fallback test using a different reranker was marked invalid and was not carried forward. The report closed by noting that the review checklist should follow the rerun rather than the discarded draft.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-18

The weekly report said Echelon Cobalt had settled on the stricter revision after the draft shortcut caused confusion. Jonah Pike was listed as the person who kept the review packet aligned with that final version. The report contrasted the active revision with a sidelined pilot from a nearby team so the archive would not mix them up. It also stated that the final packet was ready for signoff and no further correction was expected. The summary ended by saying the older shortcut should no longer be treated as the authority for Echelon.


Change Request - 2026-06-10

This change request opens the revision cycle for Project Lattice Circuit. The draft kept the evidence pooling path for the first pass, but that choice was later questioned. A reviewer argued that the chain verification route should replace the draft approach after the rerun. The request also flags a separate test from Project Citadel as unrelated noise. By the end of the draft, the team had not yet settled the dispute.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-15

These meeting minutes capture the Citadel Delta review discussion and the shortlist of options. The first pass used a broad setting, but the team treated it as only a discussion point. Lena Park said the Citadel Harbor alias should stay with the project notes for the rest of the review cycle. A second line in the minutes mentions that the narrower rerun would be checked after the meeting. The group also set aside a noisy branch named Driftline as unrelated to Citadel Delta.


Change Request - 2026-06-25

The closeout request said the rerun was now the accepted status for Xeric Horizon. It explained that the rejected pass had failed because of validation drift, so it could not be used as the final reference. The request also noted that a small backup test remained available but was not part of the status decision. Jonah Reed signed off on the summary after checking the final notes. The document ended by stating that the accepted status should be reported to stakeholders.


Incident Report - 2026-06-12

This incident report describes the failed draft run for Project Xeric Delta. The old evidence-pooling path produced an incomplete review bundle, so the team set it aside. The corrected pass switched to alias expansion and cleared the issue. Mina Shah attached the failure trace and asked the reviewers to ignore the draft output. A nearby project, Project Xeric Delta East, had a similar issue, but its queue was separate. The report leaves the final approval status to a later memo.


Review Memo - 2026-06-02

This memo reviews the Equinox comparison check and the note left by Fable. The team compared the stable route against a newer calibration path and kept both in the discussion. The newer path looked better in the first pass, but the memo warns that the result was not yet final. A side remark mentions Project Aster as an old reference point, though it was not the focus here. The memo asks for one more rerun before any sign-off. The review does not name a staffing change.


Experiment Log - 2026-05-19

The experiment log records that the final rerun succeeded after the alias cleanup was applied. Before that success, one earlier pass failed because a local reference was still stale. The log says the corrected pass produced the expected review trail for Ultraviolet Junction. Kai Moreno is credited with noticing the stale reference during the check. A short note adds that the run did not rely on the discarded draft path.


Meeting Minutes - 2026-06-09

The closeout discussion for Project Aurora Echo focused on whether any open item still blocked completion. The team agreed that the rerun had settled the main question, but one minor task remained to be logged. A participant asked whether the original scorecard could return, and the chair said no because the rerun had replaced it. The notes ended by saying the review was ready for archival once the cleanup item was recorded. No one in the room raised a new blocker for the project.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-28

This weekly report summarizes the current status for Ypsilon Delta after the retry. The earlier failed pass is mentioned only as background, while the cleaner rerun is treated as the active line. The team decided to keep the Willow-based calibration idea on hold until the review memo lands. A short resource note says that one GPU was enough for the rerun, so no extra reservation was needed. The report closes by saying the final review will compare the rerun against the noisy attempt and then publish the result. No schedule slip is recorded, but the group still wants the Delta alias used in the next handoff.


Weekly Report - 2026-06-03

The Monsoon Junction team opened the week by comparing the first retrieval pass with the follow-up plan. Alicia Reed was named the evidence lead for Project Monsoon Junction, and she kept the rerun checklist in order. The original path was set aside after the team saw that the early indexing bundle was too sparse for the review. For the rerun, the group moved to a fuller evidence set and kept the smaller bundle only as a reference point. One side discussion mentioned Project Bellwether as a nearby effort, but the meeting notes made clear that it was not part of this review. By the close of the report, the team expected the next pass to settle the remaining disagreements.