{"id": "dev_000001", "question": "For Project Thistle Harbor, what problem delayed the rerun before it could begin?", "answers": ["a validation mismatch"], "evidence": [{"doc_id": "doc_001695", "sent_id": 1}, {"doc_id": "doc_001695", "sent_id": 2}], "reasoning_type": "causal_chain"}
{"id": "dev_000002", "question": "In the Nivalis Harbor closeout, which earlier attempt was no longer worth keeping as the comparison point?", "answers": ["the old configuration"], "evidence": [{"doc_id": "doc_002050", "sent_id": 5}], "reasoning_type": "temporal_resolution"}
{"id": "dev_000003", "question": "When the Heliotrope memo closed, what setup was recommended for the next evaluation window?", "answers": ["the lighter path", "the same setup"], "evidence": [{"doc_id": "doc_000962", "sent_id": 2}, {"doc_id": "doc_000962", "sent_id": 4}], "reasoning_type": "temporal_resolution"}
{"id": "dev_000004", "question": "For Xylem Harbor, what was the final status after the mismatch in the rerun was corrected?", "answers": ["resolved"], "evidence": [{"doc_id": "doc_001498", "sent_id": 6}], "reasoning_type": "conflict_resolution"}
{"id": "dev_000005", "question": "In the Dune booking emails where Ravi Iqbal expanded the single-accelerator slot, did the emails state that a staffing change happened during the booking fix?", "answers": ["NOT_ENOUGH_INFO"], "evidence": [], "reasoning_type": "unanswerable"}
{"id": "dev_000006", "question": "In the Quasar review cycle, what temporary interruption prevented the first pass from being confirmed?", "answers": ["the shared workspace became unavailable"], "evidence": [{"doc_id": "doc_002199", "sent_id": 2}, {"doc_id": "doc_002199", "sent_id": 4}], "reasoning_type": "causal_chain"}
{"id": "dev_000007", "question": "For Equinox Harbor, how many supporting notes were counted at the final meeting?", "answers": ["two"], "evidence": [{"doc_id": "doc_000643", "sent_id": 2}], "reasoning_type": "aggregation"}
{"id": "dev_000008", "question": "What made the Briar Harbor correction acceptable in the memo?", "answers": ["the handoff now kept the evidence bundle in sequence"], "evidence": [{"doc_id": "doc_000313", "sent_id": 2}], "reasoning_type": "causal_chain"}
{"id": "dev_000009", "question": "Did the Equinox memo say the final sign-off was already settled before the rerun?", "answers": ["no"], "evidence": [{"doc_id": "doc_000735", "sent_id": 3}, {"doc_id": "doc_000735", "sent_id": 5}], "reasoning_type": "contextual_single_hop"}
{"id": "dev_000010", "question": "In the Heliotrope Harbor change request, what kind of pass was said to be too noisy to use as the baseline?", "answers": ["the first pass"], "evidence": [{"doc_id": "doc_001207", "sent_id": 2}], "reasoning_type": "contextual_single_hop"}
{"id": "dev_000011", "question": "Looking at Willow's schedule review and the final weekly report together, what timing choice was kept from the revised plan?", "answers": ["the later window"], "evidence": [{"doc_id": "doc_000911", "sent_id": 3}, {"doc_id": "doc_000569", "sent_id": 2}], "reasoning_type": "bridge_multi_doc"}
{"id": "dev_000012", "question": "In Peregrine Harbor, did the appendix lane become part of the main status?", "answers": ["no"], "evidence": [{"doc_id": "doc_000597", "sent_id": 4}], "reasoning_type": "contextual_single_hop"}
{"id": "dev_000013", "question": "In the Uplink Harbor rerun notes, after the older verification path was set aside, what became the reference path for the rest of the review?", "answers": ["document chunking"], "evidence": [{"doc_id": "doc_002074", "sent_id": 2}, {"doc_id": "doc_002074", "sent_id": 3}], "reasoning_type": "temporal_resolution"}
{"id": "dev_000014", "question": "In the Ginkgo Harbor weekly report, what was the team still watching as the week opened?", "answers": ["the latest calibration run"], "evidence": [{"doc_id": "doc_001081", "sent_id": 1}], "reasoning_type": "contextual_single_hop"}
{"id": "dev_000015", "question": "In the Thistle Harbor support notice, what resource was reserved for the cleanup pass?", "answers": ["one GPU on Node Pine-11"], "evidence": [{"doc_id": "doc_000419", "sent_id": 2}], "reasoning_type": "contextual_single_hop"}
{"id": "dev_000016", "question": "What did the earlier option rely on in the Javelin Harbor comparison note?", "answers": ["a broad alias expansion"], "evidence": [{"doc_id": "doc_000360", "sent_id": 2}], "reasoning_type": "contextual_single_hop"}
{"id": "dev_000017", "question": "After the Mariner Harbor retry plan and the corrected rerun, what stayed on record as the standard path?", "answers": ["the corrected retrieval path"], "evidence": [{"doc_id": "doc_001408", "sent_id": 4}, {"doc_id": "doc_000237", "sent_id": 3}, {"doc_id": "doc_001258", "sent_id": 2}], "reasoning_type": "bridge_multi_doc"}
{"id": "dev_000018", "question": "In the Heliotrope discussion and rerun, what reason was given for sticking with the lighter path?", "answers": ["it avoided the instability"], "evidence": [{"doc_id": "doc_001890", "sent_id": 2}, {"doc_id": "doc_000962", "sent_id": 2}], "reasoning_type": "causal_chain"}
{"id": "dev_000019", "question": "Across the Laurel Harbor notes and retry log, what setup was replaced by the corrected path before the final closeout?", "answers": ["evidence pooling"], "evidence": [{"doc_id": "doc_002071", "sent_id": 3}, {"doc_id": "doc_001281", "sent_id": 2}], "reasoning_type": "temporal_resolution"}
{"id": "dev_000020", "question": "For the Xylem rerun glitch, what was identified as the reason the second pass finally succeeded?", "answers": ["the resource fix"], "evidence": [{"doc_id": "doc_000267", "sent_id": 3}, {"doc_id": "doc_000180", "sent_id": 3}], "reasoning_type": "causal_chain"}
{"id": "dev_000021", "question": "In the Caldera Harbor records, was any final sign-off stated for the first rerun attempt?", "answers": ["no"], "evidence": [{"doc_id": "doc_000663", "sent_id": 5}], "reasoning_type": "contextual_single_hop"}
{"id": "dev_000022", "question": "In the Equinox Harbor resource notice, what was reserved for the next review?", "answers": ["a small test lane"], "evidence": [{"doc_id": "doc_000230", "sent_id": 1}], "reasoning_type": "contextual_single_hop"}
{"id": "dev_000023", "question": "After the failed Dune Harbor revision, what did the review memo say should stay ready until a cleaner rerun finishes?", "answers": ["fallback indexing lane"], "evidence": [{"doc_id": "doc_000029", "sent_id": 3}], "reasoning_type": "temporal_resolution"}
{"id": "dev_000024", "question": "In the Yonder Harbor thread, after the broad sweep was rejected, what kind of pass did the team keep for the revision?", "answers": ["narrower pass"], "evidence": [{"doc_id": "doc_000966", "sent_id": 2}, {"doc_id": "doc_000966", "sent_id": 3}], "reasoning_type": "comparison_with_filtering"}
{"id": "dev_000025", "question": "In the Isobar Harbor planning notes, after the shaky draft was left behind, what did the team decide would guide the next review?", "answers": ["the rerun"], "evidence": [{"doc_id": "doc_000335", "sent_id": 2}, {"doc_id": "doc_000335", "sent_id": 5}], "reasoning_type": "temporal_resolution"}
{"id": "dev_000026", "question": "In the Equinox Harbor notes, was a full replacement plan announced by the end of the cycle?", "answers": ["no"], "evidence": [{"doc_id": "doc_001175", "sent_id": 5}, {"doc_id": "doc_000643", "sent_id": 4}], "reasoning_type": "contextual_single_hop"}
{"id": "dev_000027", "question": "For Isobar Harbor, what issue caused the first validation sweep to break during the rerun?", "answers": ["the cache was rebuilt in the wrong order"], "evidence": [{"doc_id": "doc_000054", "sent_id": 1}], "reasoning_type": "causal_chain"}
{"id": "dev_000028", "question": "After the corrected rerun in Yonder Harbor, how many comparison studies were kept in the final review?", "answers": ["two"], "evidence": [{"doc_id": "doc_000661", "sent_id": 2}, {"doc_id": "doc_000661", "sent_id": 3}], "reasoning_type": "aggregation"}
{"id": "dev_000029", "question": "In the Dune Harbor change request, what older path was the team trying to move away from?", "answers": ["dense path"], "evidence": [{"doc_id": "doc_001357", "sent_id": 2}], "reasoning_type": "contextual_single_hop"}
{"id": "dev_000030", "question": "About Isobar Harbor, is there enough information to name the person who owned the final follow-up list after the review wrapped?", "answers": ["NOT_ENOUGH_INFO"], "evidence": [], "reasoning_type": "unanswerable"}
{"id": "dev_000031", "question": "Was the name of the person who approved the corrected pass in Kestrel Harbor stated anywhere?", "answers": ["NOT_ENOUGH_INFO"], "evidence": [], "reasoning_type": "unanswerable"}
{"id": "dev_000032", "question": "Across the Caldera notice and Omar Reed's email thread, what was the short window ultimately treated as?", "answers": ["backup"], "evidence": [{"doc_id": "doc_001276", "sent_id": 2}, {"doc_id": "doc_001575", "sent_id": 6}], "reasoning_type": "aggregation"}
{"id": "dev_000033", "question": "Across the Thistle Harbor notice and the weekly report, what support window outcome was described for the cleanup pass?", "answers": ["the support window from the notice had been enough"], "evidence": [{"doc_id": "doc_000419", "sent_id": 6}, {"doc_id": "doc_001950", "sent_id": 3}], "reasoning_type": "aggregation"}
{"id": "dev_000034", "question": "In Willow Harbor, after the older hybrid path was tested first, what path did the team keep because it made the notes easier to trace?", "answers": ["document chunking"], "evidence": [{"doc_id": "doc_000314", "sent_id": 2}, {"doc_id": "doc_000314", "sent_id": 3}], "reasoning_type": "temporal_resolution"}
{"id": "dev_000035", "question": "For Yonder Harbor, what old branch was mentioned as the source of the missed section before the correction?", "answers": ["older branch"], "evidence": [{"doc_id": "doc_001500", "sent_id": 2}], "reasoning_type": "causal_chain"}
{"id": "dev_000036", "question": "After the Obsidian Harbor rerun, what local review label stayed attached to the bundle?", "answers": ["Harbor Lantern"], "evidence": [{"doc_id": "doc_000933", "sent_id": 3}, {"doc_id": "doc_001353", "sent_id": 3}], "reasoning_type": "contextual_single_hop"}
{"id": "dev_000037", "question": "In the Xylem Harbor notes, after the older retrieval path was dropped, what became the working fallback for the next pass?", "answers": ["chunked document path"], "evidence": [{"doc_id": "doc_001924", "sent_id": 2}, {"doc_id": "doc_001924", "sent_id": 3}], "reasoning_type": "contextual_single_hop"}
{"id": "dev_000038", "question": "In the final Ledger memo, which older reference was no longer treated as the reference?", "answers": ["older pilot"], "evidence": [{"doc_id": "doc_002123", "sent_id": 2}], "reasoning_type": "contextual_single_hop"}
{"id": "dev_000039", "question": "In the Yonder Harbor recap, what did the report say the final review excluded?", "answers": ["the retired branch"], "evidence": [{"doc_id": "doc_000661", "sent_id": 3}], "reasoning_type": "temporal_resolution"}
{"id": "dev_000040", "question": "In the Willow change request, after the draft timing was rejected, what direction did the final plan keep for the milestone?", "answers": ["later"], "evidence": [{"doc_id": "doc_000911", "sent_id": 2}, {"doc_id": "doc_000911", "sent_id": 3}], "reasoning_type": "temporal_resolution"}
{"id": "dev_000041", "question": "For the Yonder closeout, which phrase shows that the final choice was the same cleaned trail described in the memo?", "answers": ["the same cleaned evidence trail"], "evidence": [{"doc_id": "doc_001165", "sent_id": 3}], "reasoning_type": "contextual_single_hop"}
{"id": "dev_000042", "question": "After the rerun comparison and the final check, what was Equinox ready for?", "answers": ["handoff to the next group"], "evidence": [{"doc_id": "doc_000788", "sent_id": 5}, {"doc_id": "doc_000761", "sent_id": 4}], "reasoning_type": "bridge_multi_doc"}
{"id": "dev_000043", "question": "Using the Dune Harbor change request and the later review memo, what direction did Mira conclude was still the right one even after the failed run?", "answers": ["fusion revision"], "evidence": [{"doc_id": "doc_001357", "sent_id": 2}, {"doc_id": "doc_000029", "sent_id": 2}], "reasoning_type": "bridge_multi_doc"}
{"id": "dev_000044", "question": "In the Peregrine Harbor meeting, what local alias was used for the follow-up bundle?", "answers": ["Harbor Thread"], "evidence": [{"doc_id": "doc_001345", "sent_id": 2}, {"doc_id": "doc_002102", "sent_id": 5}], "reasoning_type": "contextual_single_hop"}
{"id": "dev_000045", "question": "In the Fable Harbor kickoff notes, what issue made the team set aside the first pass before the rerun?", "answers": ["checkpoint problem"], "evidence": [{"doc_id": "doc_000184", "sent_id": 2}], "reasoning_type": "contextual_single_hop"}
{"id": "dev_000046", "question": "In the Xylem notice, what kind of allocation was used for the rerun after the stall?", "answers": ["a larger shared allocation"], "evidence": [{"doc_id": "doc_002146", "sent_id": 2}], "reasoning_type": "contextual_single_hop"}
{"id": "dev_000047", "question": "In the Caldera Harbor incident note, what was the reason the first rerun was stopped after the compact reranker looked promising?", "answers": ["validation sweep drifted"], "evidence": [{"doc_id": "doc_000663", "sent_id": 2}], "reasoning_type": "causal_chain"}
{"id": "dev_000048", "question": "For Aegis Ledger, what did the correction restore the rerun to after the first pass followed the older pilot note?", "answers": ["steadier voting-based check"], "evidence": [{"doc_id": "doc_000170", "sent_id": 2}, {"doc_id": "doc_000170", "sent_id": 3}], "reasoning_type": "causal_chain"}
{"id": "dev_000049", "question": "Did the harbor thread say why the broader setup had been rejected in Javelin Harbor?", "answers": ["NOT_ENOUGH_INFO"], "evidence": [], "reasoning_type": "unanswerable"}
{"id": "dev_000050", "question": "In the Equinox memo, what kind of evidence pass replaced the rough approach?", "answers": ["structured evidence pass"], "evidence": [{"doc_id": "doc_001840", "sent_id": 2}], "reasoning_type": "contextual_single_hop"}